I don't see them leaving out older AppleTVs, especially since they can already play 720p HD. I've never heard of anyone not being able to play properly encoded (i.e., 720p, 24fps, etc.) on their TV.True dat but it will be a new Apple TV.
I don't see them leaving out older AppleTVs, especially since they can already play 720p HD. I've never heard of anyone not being able to play properly encoded (i.e., 720p, 24fps, etc.) on their TV.True dat but it will be a new Apple TV.
Yeah, I disagree. They'll add true 720p, and it'll work just fine with existing Apple TVs. The ONLY problem is, it will likely only work on the current generation of iPod Classic, Nano, Touch and iPhone. Basically anything with access to a hardware H.263 decoder (which I believe Apple TV has).True dat but it will be a new Apple TV.
I don't see them leaving out older AppleTVs, especially since they can already play 720p HD. I've never heard of anyone not being able to play properly encoded (i.e., 720p, 24fps, etc.) on their TV.
Yeah, I disagree. They'll add true 720p, and it'll work just fine with existing Apple TVs. The ONLY problem is, it will likely only work on the current generation of iPod Classic, Nano, Touch and iPhone. Basically anything with access to a hardware H.263 decoder (which I believe Apple TV has).
~ CB
I get it, you don't want to be wrong. No problem. My original message just said that you should NOT call "Included" services on your cable "free" if you wanted to make a fair comparison. That's all. You wrote a very looooooong response. It's clear you have a legal background.You were still inaccurate, and I think you agreed... you just like the relative feeling that its "free to me", regardless of how incompatible the statement is to the value proposition represented to others.
--Everything else is completely irrelevant, but possibly fun to explore and discuss I 'spose, we shouldn't digress into it though and lose the original point being made.
~ CB
I think there is a difference between "included" and "free". I think its a "free gift" if they give you a 1 GB USB memory stick every month with your cable subscription during a certain "promo" period. Your OnDemand channels are "included". They're actually on the service description, aren't they? Moreover, if they decided tomorrow to take them ALL away tomorrow, and still charge you the same thing... I'm sorry, but I have a feeling you'd have a legal leg to stand on if you declared that they were supposed to be "Included". You wouldn't call them up asking them where your "freebies" were. --I mean, would you?You'd try to argue with someone trying to give you a free pancake. It's included in the cost of the rest of my breakfast! But to each his own. I'll enjoy the pancake at no additional cost.
Sounds like a Netflix-type of arrangement.![]()
Actually... same difference, right? I only referred to 720p, because of the issue of practicality for downloading (and that being the lowest you could go and still call it HD). I've gotten over the "swelling" of the standard iTunes video resolution, but it certainly killed playback on my old computer.I was actually referring to any potential 1080i/P content. And as long as Fox/Disney are the only providers this will continue as a "hobby".
Don't feel bad, honestly... a year ago someone pointed this out to me. I'd attended a Salesforce seminar here in Boston, and they were giving out a "FREE" book of "Salesforce for Dummies". I thought it was great. I remarked to my boss... "Hey, its great that they're giving these out for FREE!" He squinted at me, and reminded me that he pays for each and everyone of our Salesforce accounts... and that whether its "Included" or "Complimentary", I shouldn't be under the delusion that its "free". I felt mortified 'cause he was right.
Actually... same difference, right? I only referred to 720p, because of the issue of practicality for downloading (and that being the lowest you could go and still call it HD). I've gotten over the "swelling" of the standard iTunes video resolution, but it certainly killed playback on my old computer.
That said, AppleTV has already been doing 1080i content. It's only the 1080p content that it doesn't support. I think a number of people have been giving that a whirl. I'm not clear on the tests of streaming vs. on-board HD though.
~ CB
It's just not workable for comparing that to a service without a subscription.
If you were comparing cable services, it would make complete sense to compare
subscription rates, and compare what each gives you "for free", "complimentarily" or "at no added cost".
~ CB
Mm. That's just sad. I was also looking up 1080i just know, I guess there's a lot of confusion out there. Apple TV ALSO doesn't do 540p at 60 fps, so its not really able to REALLY do kosher 1080i either, right (just upscaled 720p at 30 fps)? I guess I misspoke. Sorry.To me "true HD" means 5.1 DD..Something the current Apple TV wont do.
It is but you aren't doing it through the mail and you aren't streaming the videos; isn't netflix streamed?
To me "true HD" means 5.1 DD..Something the current Apple TV wont do.
I know. I get into arguments all the time on the "true for me" relativity thing. I have a friend that regularly plays devil's advocate without warning, its unnerving. You're totally right for people in your situation. I went back to terrestrial a few years ago, after a friend chided me for not realizing how many people don't need cable to watch TV (I'd been regularly buying Lost episodes from iTunes along with Battlestar Galactica).But that's the point of my post CB. For folks that have digital cable (like me), will Apple's service be alluring, fill any gaps / needs? Will it add something that folks will want for the $2 to $5 if they're already getting a to-the-tv service with at least some no additional charge programming and $3.99 rentals.
I think he really means "high definition" straight up. It's fairly RIDICULOUS to have a high resolution picture and NO surround sound in the audio track. It's not as if AAC doesn't support 5.1 either. Hopefully they'll sort this out along with closed captions and language options.Why would you think the type of audio defines a video source "true HD". This would mean, using your definition, that 480i with 5.1 is HD whereas 1080p with stereo is not? HD refers to the number of pixels in a single frame to me, thus anything around or over 1 Million Pixels is worthy of that title today (who knows in 5 years). Maybe I am not understanding your meaning here.
Step 1 - Download Movie
Step 2 - Sync movie to iPod
Step 3 - Don't sync to iTunes again until your ready to 'return' your rental.
Why would you think the type of audio defines a video source "true HD". This would mean, using your definition, that 480i with 5.1 is HD whereas 1080p with stereo is not? HD refers to the number of pixels in a single frame to me, thus anything around or over 1 Million Pixels is worthy of that title today (who knows in 5 years). Maybe I am not understanding your meaning here.
Mm. That's just sad. I was also looking up 1080i just know, I guess there's a lot of confusion out there. Apple TV ALSO doesn't do 540p at 60 fps, so its not really able to REALLY do kosher 1080i either, right (just upscaled 720p at 30 fps)? I guess I misspoke. Sorry.
~ CB
45 minute TV shows are $1.99.
1.5 hour movies are $9.99
Why is the scale so non-linear?
TV shows give you so much more bang for your buck, as long as it's not "Bone Detectives." (Oh my gosh I wanted to die of boredom!)