Because Apple makes a cut of money from AT&T services, not just the physical iPhone.
...
Farmboy,
See how mobile phones are being used around the world. US laws are NOT binding on those outside of the US and please leave your American arrogance at the door. Mobile phones and mobile phone technology is not based on US dominance.
Nope, no communist here ! More the opposite of it tho ;o)
Now ... if I would be a hacker ... I would say that because of the basic concept of being a "real" hacker. But I am not ...
But that was not my point ! Since I am one of those suckers that "some" people call capitalist ... I am just against Apple iPhone Unlocks ! IMO did Apple (and Steve Jobs) a hell of a job with the iPhone and I simply don´t like the idea of "getting-around" his concept (in cooperation with AT&T) of making money out of it.
Thanks for the explanation McCoy, I can definitely understand your sentiments. The iPhone is a truly great peice of work. If it weren't for my previous experience with AT&T's horrendous customer service (and I mean bordering on things that breach their contract with me, such as providing me a new SIM card that wouldn't work with my phone, then demanding I buy a new phone, rather than reactivating my old SIM).
Here was the issue: we wanted to change our phone numbers to a local area code after a recent move. Now in my experience with T-mobile, this took about 5 minutes and no hassle (AND no contract extension). With AT&T, they said we would need new SIM cards because we were still using the old SIM's (from AT&T before they became Cingular). When we got the new cards, I called to activate mine.
After the activation call (you have to call AT&T to activate), I hung up and put the new SIM in my phone. When I turned it on, it said "Enter Subsidy Unlock Code:" and of course would do nothing else (as you know, carriers here require manufacturers to lock the phones, and apparently Cingular hadn't bothered to make their SIMS compatible with the old AT&T phones). I called back, and they said there was nothing I could do, they told me I would have to buy a new phone, they wouldn't cancel the contract without me paying termination fee, and they wanted me to extend the contract even further to get a subsidized phone. After haggling with them for more than 3 hours, they finally transferred me to someone who reactivated my old SIM in about 5 minutes.
Because of this and several other incidences demonstrating AT&T/Cingular Customer Services Reps' complete incompetence (along with their policy of extending contracts for various requests without informing the customer), I believe that AT&T is EVIL, and was saddened by Apple's deal with them. Hence, I am very happy to see people find a way to go with T-Mobile.
Because Apple makes a cut of money from AT&T services, not just the physical iPhone.
I agree that "freedom of criticism" is important - but to criticize for the sake of criticizing is just plain stupid. Some people think that to be truly objective requires that they find fault with everything and ultimately they end up very unhappy people.
I'd love for you to cite the case law on that.
There's a ton of misinformation that's being passed around about the legality of unlocking cell phones in the United States.
Where's the precedent to believe they will do this? People have been unlocking carrier locked GSM phones for years.
Personally I would just like my iPhone unlocked so I can pop a local SIM card in it when in Europe, to avoid ridiculous EDGE fees from AT&T. I'm still going to remain a AT&T customer in the USA however, as AT&T provide a better service and certainly better support for the iPhone than T-Mobile.
Now what would really be interesting is the AppleCare question. On allconfused
Apple products the coverage is worldwide, correct? If I'm in Europe and my MacBook dies on me I can pop into an authorised Apple dealer and have them fix it under the terms of my AppleCare agreement. Is this the same with iPhone? If so, then that really opens the floodgates for iPhone imports from the US.
Someone raised the issue of the software install / alternate network thing as being a possible justification for Apple not honouring the warranty - can't remember who - but that's not the case with other Apple products, is it?
I bet this is a firmware hack, which would invalidate your warranty and is not comparable to installing another OS...
I predict a lawsuit.
Someone raised the issue of the software install / alternate network thing as being a possible justification for Apple not honouring the warranty - can't remember who - but that's not the case with other Apple products, is it? If I wipe OS X off my MacBook in favour of Ubuntu (not me, although I'm sure some have), Apple wouldn't quibble about the warranty if I took it in with a valid and qualifying hardware issue. What if I had installed Linux on my 5G
Now if only someone could hack Verizon and magically get them onto GSM.
There are always a ton of posts here about people's experiences with an individual carrier. It is important to keep all these stories in perspective- they're anecdotal, nothing more.
As someone else alluded to, you can find a positive or negative story about practically any carrier. There is no way to guarantee what your experience with an individual carrier will be like. Any time you deal with a large company, you are really at the mercy of whoever your call gets routed to in their call center.
This isn't to say that scientifically conducted surveys can't yield information on which carriers, on average, are better at certain things than the others. But I can assure you, which ever carrier got the iPhone deal was bound to be the recipient of a lot of forums posts saying how bad they suck.