Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I sometimes would wonder what the use of having Skype on a cell phone would be- it made no sense to me. But now I can see it... (I also see why some carriers might not want Skype capabilities on a phone!)
T-Mobile USA now will enable this for you (their own VOIP network, but same idea) for $9.99 / month. They give you a router if you need one but you can hook it up with any open network and those with certain types of encryptions and you get unlimited calls to both mobile and landline of all operators when using the VOIP connexion. If you stray outside of the wireless network, it swaps over to the T-Mobile towers, and switches back when you head back into the wifi zone.
 
Quoted from iphonesimfree.com:

"We are currently opening up our mail for bulk purchase enquiries of 500 licenses and above. "


They know that no one is going to pay for this utility once it gets out in the wild and they are trying to get license fees up front through bulk sales, before "Individual per unit licenses will be available starting next week". Good luck with that.

I predict this will be the most pirated piece of software recently produced.

the irony.


i havent gone through the entire thread but am i right in understanding that one could buy an iphone in the states and move it to any country with a gsm service and use it there with a local provider?
 
A couple of things I thought I might add, this move is likely to put pressure on Apple to deploy the Iphone to other regions - otherwise they will be too late. People will have them and be running on a network that is not paying Apple kickbacks.

You may say only geeks and the like will apply this unlock so that affect could be small, but you have to be realistic about the target audience of this device. This is a US $599 device that really is targeted at that market. (The rumored Iphone nano might be a different story) The kind of people buying Iphones are the kind of people most likely to apply this patch.

It will also hurt Apple's abillity to negiotiate exclusive deals that involve revenue sharing.

If I was representing a carrier, I would be telling Apple to jam it - I am going to get added customers anyway without any revenue sharing - just from people buying, unlocking and using my network SIM in the Iphone.
 
You guys know those clauses that the music industry has with the iTunes store contracts that say if DRM is ever circumvented Apple has a short time to issue a fix or they reserve the right to back out of the deal?

I imagine AT&T would have included some similar clause in their contract with Apple so I wouldn't be surprised to see a future update relock phones if technically possible of course.
 
It will be very interesting to see if Apple Legal puts a stop on this...and if so, on what legal grounds.
I doubt there's much Apple or AT&T legal can do. It is 100% legal to unlock your cell phone in the U.S. :)

http://www.copyright.gov/1201/

Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network.
 
This is helpful for a person like me who has T-Mobile, but want an iPhone. Cingular service does not work well at my house, but T-Mobile service works great. Also, I get internet for $5 with T-Mobile right now.


I just hope that the software are for Macs, because I do not trust Parallels and how it handles USB devices.
 
I just hope that the software are for Macs, because I do not trust Parallels and how it handles USB devices.


I've flashed my phone (HTC Herald) several times from a Parallels VM and everything went well. I've yet to run into any issues with a VM and a USB device.
 
So wait, because they are making more money by selling the iPhone than from the kickbacks (which should be over $120 per customer by the way), that means Apple should not care about losing that money? That $120 is the subsidy - for Apple to make the same money from the deal without the kickbacks, they would have to sell the phone for $150 more, give or take.

So, the idea was that the people who would go for this are those who want an iPhone but are unwilling to sign a contract with AT&T. Hence, they are selling iPhones that they would not have sold. Apple makes a large profit on each iPhone sold (probably around $250 to $300). Still, it depends on your theory. If you think this has more of a result that people who would have bought iPhones and AT&T plans now buy iPhones and go with AT&T, or if you think the effect is more that people who would not have bought iPhones will.

My opinion is that it would be the latter.
 
I doubt there's much Apple or AT&T legal can do. It is 100% legal to unlock your cell phone in the U.S. :)

http://www.copyright.gov/1201/

I wonder what would happen if someone offered T-Mobile USA similar terms to those Apple has offered AT&T - eg, they'll buy, unlock, and "relock" an iPhone to T-Mobile's network, selling the phone on, with T-Mobile kicking them back a $3-8 per month fee for doing so.

If that became a practical proposition, the sheer insanity of continuing with the locked phone model would become apparent even to those thinking they're benefiting from it right now.

If Apple made a phone that was desirable to me, I'd rather pay the $3x24 ($72) extra you would have gotten from AT&T so I can use it with T-Mobile normally, or an AT&T GoPhone PAYG SIM when I don't have coverage, and a PAYG SIM when I'm abroad, than use it only on AT&T. But the logic of charging slightly more for a much better product seems lost on some companies that supposedly have a reputation for doing just that.
 
Why is Edge fees ridiculous? No other carries provides unlimited data access for a smart phone for under $40/month. $20/month is a pretty good deal in comparison.
Did you even read my post? I was talking about EDGE prices when abroad.
 
Visual Voicemail, great feature, but not necessarily worth giving money to a company I hate (AT&T). T-mobile was always really friendly, and their support reps were always so much more competent, in my dealings with the two companies.

I am always curious when I hear about 'customer dealings' of one mobile provider being better then that of another. Maybe for those individuals that utilize their plan, both voice and/or data, to the maximum and may go over and therefore have a billing issue or the like... I have NEVER encountered a situation that required me to deal with a mobile provider's customer service with any regards other than to sign-up for my initial plan, get my phone and maybe make an in-store monthly bill payment.

I had been with Altell for about 5 years before moving on to T-Mobile for the past 4 years and outside of going to a local altell or t-mob shop to make a monthly bill payment that would have been late had I put it in the mail or to stop by the shop every 6 months or so to see the new phones that might be out, I have had virtually no contact with either company's customer service regarding any issues to be resovled in order to judge one way or the other how great or bad their customer service is. I'd image AT&T would be the same way, and that is, as long as I have no discrepancy with billing (ie. utilizing my plan both voice and/or data to the maximum and go over and therefore have a billing issue), I doubt if I'll ever need an AT&T customer service rep, especially now that billing is no longer 300 pages, except to see the iPhone 2 when it comes out or change to a higher rate $$$ plan with more minutes.

Complaining to customer service about coverage and EDGE is a non issue, by that I mean, I have read the posts and hear the news and read the articles concerning EDGE and phone coverage so I'm not walking into something blind. Sure I can call AT&T to tell them I wish phone coverage was better in my area or data transfer speeds were faster but with all respect, I could have done the same with Altell and T-Mobile regarding coverage and/or data plans.

As I said, I am curious about what problems cropped up for other people (such as the poster I quoted - bdj21ya or others with similar experiences) that required customer service and when they got bad customer service, what happened. I'd like to know, just so I know what may be in store for me if I get an iPhone and switch from T-Mobile to AT&T (not going to use a hack software just to maintain a T-Mobile account)? - thanks
 
I'd just like to say that on my local GSM carrier, I can get 200 minutes of voice (which is all I'll ever use) and unlimited data for $16.00 per month. If I was someone who would use text messaging, I could add that for an additional $5.00 per month. The concept of paying $60-100+ per month for (roughly) the same thing is mind-blowing to me. Oh, and I don't get AT&T or T-Mobile where I live, anyway.
 
Because Apple makes a cut of money from AT&T services, not just the physical iPhone.

But on the other hand, this will enlarge iPhone's market from 300 million people up to 6 billion :rolleyes: Think Different, Think Bigger.. ^^

I dont see Apple caring about this. They even could have been given the software solution themselves.. Their margin on the iPhone sales are about 30-35%.. They already make good profit by selling iPhone alone.
 
Cdma

I wish that there was a way to switch it over to a CDMA network, I know its not physically possible but I love Alltel, they have excellent customer service, My RAZR was stolen in Time Square and Alltel was very friendly and disabled the phone and when I returned to Virgina they were very much willing to replace the phone, they didn't make me jump through any hoops. I've never had a dropped call, I always have lots of "bars," plus MyCircle is great, it has five more than T-Mobile's MyFavs.
 
This is great news, only concern is the price. Tempted to import an iphone now:) , wonder if they will "patch" this somehow for the European version.
 
Agreed, but I'm pretty certain that the scientific studies yield results that Verizon and T-Mobile are at the top for U.S. cell company customer service ratings (I'd cite the study, but I'd have to pay to subscribe to consumer reports to confirm this easily, anyone else have the hard data?).

I just wanted to share my anecdotal evidence to give people an idea of how evil they can be, since I wouldn't have guessed it before experiencing it for myself. Also, there is a transcript from a recent piece on Red Tape Chronicles discussing how common it is for carriers to extend contracts when you call them, without your consent, EVEN WITHOUT INFORMING YOU. This has been my continued experience with AT&T, while I called T-mobile many times for similar requests (e.g. changing phone number) and had no problems with them extending my contract.

Well I inquired about your bad experience that has given you so much heartache that leads you to call AT&T Evil. Sorry you had to go through such a hassel that, fortunately, got resolved in the end. With regard to Verizon "at the top for U.S. cell company customer service ratings", I guess you didn't hear about this horror story about Verizon Customer Service and their math, I guess this individual can say Verizon if EVIL too!... http://media.putfile.com/Verizon-Bad-Math
 
You'll also feel pretty stupid when your hacked phones arrive at their European destinations - right about the same time Apple announces availability over there.

"Availability" in Germany means being tied to T-Mobile (a German company btw). Early cancellation is not common over here, so I can't switch providers, even if I wanted to.

Given that my hacked phone will arrive next week, about 4 months before the official German release—I think I won't look stupid at all.
 
The iPhone should have never be locked up in the first place.

Consumers pay full price for a phone.. and *still* be told what cell networks they can / can't use.

This application should be welcome. Consumer freedom.

There's also consumer freedom in that you don't have to buy an iPhone if you don't like Apple's way of doing things. They have a right to constrain their products however they want. You have a right to walk away from it. Nobody is forcing you to buy.

Having said that, I think Apple won't fight this. They still earn a lot of money off each iPhone sold, phone contract notwithstanding.
 
Yeah, I agree. I wouldn't really care so much if they supplied this hack for free. But turning a profit on such a thing is pretty despicable. And especially since the article says it is well deserved.

I guess we should start paying hackers for Serial numbers they turn out too.

Except that cracking serial numbers is illegal while unlocking phones is not.
 
I'm surprised they're selling it; it'll just be pirated, and Apple legal will sue very fast and close their accounts.

It would seem more profitable to just host it on a server with a ton of advertisements and make money off ads.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.