Well, you are obviously coming from a particular point of view, and from a set of circumstances that you didn't disclose the detail of in the first posts. I will not address the RAM pricing because you didn't tell about that till post #21.
You feel the salesman was concealing the fact of an option (that FutureShop did not have in stock to sell) -- without knowing yourself whether that option was pertinent to the use that the customer would have put the machine to.
So the salesman either
1) Was selling the appropriate system to the customer based on their requirements, in which case the 256 card option was about as relevant as a MacPro's CPU options would have been to the conversation
-or-
2) Was Ignorant of the fact that if the customer needed a higher video card it could be special ordered and then either
. a) still acted appropriately for the customers stated requirements
. -or-
. b) through ignorance didn't offer an option that would have been in the best interests of the customer, because they had stated a requirement for video rendering or games.
-or-
3) Was instructed that the only machines he could sell were the ones in stock, and then either
. a) acted appropriately for the customers stated requirements
. -or-
. b) conciously concealed an option that would have been in the best interests of the customer, because they had stated a requirement for video rendering or games.
So in scenario 1), 2a) and 3a), IMO you were out of line and #&^$ed up both the sale AND the customers' buying experience. Good work.
In scenario 2b) you were the well-meaning but poorly handled intervener
In scenario 3b) you are the white knight who saved the customers from an inappropriate purchase. Yay.
You feel the salesman was concealing the fact of an option (that FutureShop did not have in stock to sell) -- without knowing yourself whether that option was pertinent to the use that the customer would have put the machine to.
So the salesman either
1) Was selling the appropriate system to the customer based on their requirements, in which case the 256 card option was about as relevant as a MacPro's CPU options would have been to the conversation
-or-
2) Was Ignorant of the fact that if the customer needed a higher video card it could be special ordered and then either
. a) still acted appropriately for the customers stated requirements
. -or-
. b) through ignorance didn't offer an option that would have been in the best interests of the customer, because they had stated a requirement for video rendering or games.
-or-
3) Was instructed that the only machines he could sell were the ones in stock, and then either
. a) acted appropriately for the customers stated requirements
. -or-
. b) conciously concealed an option that would have been in the best interests of the customer, because they had stated a requirement for video rendering or games.
So in scenario 1), 2a) and 3a), IMO you were out of line and #&^$ed up both the sale AND the customers' buying experience. Good work.
In scenario 2b) you were the well-meaning but poorly handled intervener
In scenario 3b) you are the white knight who saved the customers from an inappropriate purchase. Yay.