pdpfilms said:Sounds good! can't wait to see some pictures. I'm sure they'll dazzle over those sony's. blech.
what sony's?
pdpfilms said:Sounds good! can't wait to see some pictures. I'm sure they'll dazzle over those sony's. blech.
AndrewMT said:Umm, no optical drives on the low-end model? I mean, I understood why Apple stopped installing floppy drives in their machines, but I think it's a little to early to call optical drives obsolete.
I for one hope these rumors are untrue. Besides the processor and sata drives, these new iMacs would not be much of an improvement over the previous models.
mvc said:Hmm, but the point of coreimage is that most developers and software can and will use it easily. Apple's own apps will use it. Quicktime will use it. Preview will probably use it. There is no way a brand new Mac of any flavour, education or otherwise, will fail to support it.
Its called COREimage for a reason.
This rumour is seriously messed up, and probably terminal 🙄
Zaty said:Obviously, not everyone has the same needs. While I agree with you that there are many people who don't need the latest and greates hardware available, don't forget that iMacs are relativley expensive computers and for $2,200 I think you can expect a decent gpu and at least 512 MB of ram. I'm aware that comparing an iMac with a $ 2,200 PC is like comparing apples with oranges, but especially those fanatic Mac heads who blindly approve what ever Apple does should at least a have look beyond the world of the Mac to see what is going on technologically the whole wide world of computing. Don't forget, there are quite a few PCs out there which would be nice machines if they're were not running Windows. As for gamers, I think Apple really doesn't care about you, sadly but true.
Stella said:2200 for a high end model is way too expensive if the rumours are true.
Apple should be aiming for lower model < $1000...
MacSA said:"Pricing is expected to be in the $1300 - $2200 range, but higher prices haven't been ruled out.
Starting with an education-aimed model lacking any optical drives presumably to replace the current eMac"
Do they mean replace the current eMac completely? 😱 😱 The eMac is currently available for £549 in the UK, the $1300 - $2200 price range of the new iMac is too high for me and many other people I would bet. If thats the cheapest Mac that Apple will offer in the future, NO WAY will I be switching.
Hector said:there not going to replace the emac the imac you have to add the duty apple pays for getting the things to the uk and the magical stuff costs more in the uk tax and it will cost £799
AndrewMT said:Umm, no optical drives on the low-end model? I mean, I understood why Apple stopped installing floppy drives in their machines, but I think it's a little to early to call optical drives obsolete.
I for one hope these rumors are untrue. Besides the processor and sata drives, these new iMacs would not be much of an improvement over the previous models.
nagromme said:ThinkSecret could be wrong--they have been before, like any rumor site. Their record is good lately, though--as is MacRumors' judgment of what makes Page One. I think the specs have a good chance of being right.
Don't judge them too much on the edu model though: that's for a specific need and won't be available to most of us anyway. It's for basic no-frills computer labs. So the lack of a modem, optical drive--and maybe even Core Video support--could all make perfect sense as cost-saving measures.
MacSA said:Sorry, none of that made sense.
A $1300 computer in the US would be about £1000 here in the UK. Thats twice the price of the eMac.
Porchland said:Apple must have some plan for how to install software. Whisper it into the microphone. Psst! 010101100100100101...
Trimix said:probably it was the steve-master who 'leaked' some specs just to fall laughing out of his hospital bed, reading our frantic responses.
then aug 31 will come and we all will go woppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
amex is charged, visa is charged, ready to do battle 😀
eji said:Last week I was really excited for the new iMac. That has since changed.