If it wasn't for Microsoft, Apple wouldn't exist.
Huh? MS was founded just under exactly one year before Apple. And Apple definitely led the technology advances early on. Did I miss something? Perhaps I'm too tired to catch sarcasm?
If it wasn't for Microsoft, Apple wouldn't exist.
They don't allow iPods at work. Google it.
They don't allow iPods at work. Google it.
"About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. "It's pretty staggering."
The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player -- that translates to 16,000 iPod users among the 25,000 who work at or near Microsoft's corporate campus. "This irks the management team no end," said the source.
So popular is the iPod, executives are increasingly sending out memos frowning on its use.
Huh? MS was founded just under exactly one year before Apple. And Apple definitely led the technology advances early on. Did I miss something? Perhaps I'm too tired to catch sarcasm?
Back in 1997 when Apple was headed down the toilet, it was MS who bought some Apple stock and invested around $150 million, effectively saving the company.
I've met 8 year olds more mature than you.
If it wasn't for Microsoft, Apple wouldn't exist.
Back in 1997 when Apple was headed down the toilet, it was MS who bought some Apple stock and invested around $150 million, effectively saving the company.
Considering that MS does not even allow it's employees to have iPods, I'd say Zune/Mac compatibility is a minor issue.
Ballmer even forbids his kids from having iPods, or anything Mac related.
Microsoft's products are usually of fairly good quality, especially their mouses and keyboards.
I think it was actually the promise to keep developing software for the Mac for the next five years that saved them. The $150 million was a help to be sure, but having Microsoft Office was a big help.
Microsoft making the Zune work with OS X would be about as pointless as developing Internet Explorer for Linux.
Like Safari for Windows?
Not in Windows it doesn't/isn't.except safari somewhat works and is actually handy.
now thats a matter of opnion
DoFoT9 said:...safari somewhat works and is actually handy.
Yep, but it sounds like you're criticizing me for stating my opinion, even though you stated your own.
Safari is a piece of crap in OSX, I can't imagine how bad it is on Windows.
Firefox > *![]()
no sorry, i wasnt critisizing you. i just think that safari in winblows is quite exceptional for a bunch for mac coders who were asked to write the program in windows code.
u really think so?? wow ok.. what kind of experience is that from? a bad one lol?
Yes, I've found it to be slow and clunky and doesn't have nearly the amount of customization abilities as Firefox does. Maybe Safari's improved since the last time I've used it, but I don't plan on using it ever again.
I wouldn't mind having a Zune, they're not crap, people. You're entitled to your opinion after you try it (cough*DoFoT9*cough)
But right now I have my eye on a 4G 20 GB iPod this time.
Seriously.
Since when does Microsoft make anything Mac compatible?
That's what I thought.![]()