Maxed out? I had to dial cod4 down quite a lot in detail for it to feel smooth enough for network play on windows.
Ok Sweet that sounds good. Do you think MacBook Pro performance would be better than a 20" iMac with 2600 Pro?
Also it is possible to manually add ram? And is the Ram in the 15" version DDR3 as well?
Thanks.
It is DDR3 and you can manually add it up to 6GB
and the imac would be better, but not portable.
It is DDR3 and you can manually add it up to 6GB
and the imac would be better, but not portable.
but you would lose dual core support which is needed for rendering and shading.
unless they sell 3gb ddr3 chips.
Why dont you play the Mac version then?
and the windows version can only be played maxed out on XP on VISTA its no good because vista hogs too much of the laptops resources and leaves hardly anything for the game.
The 9600m GT should be faster. Using 3dmark06, a 9600m GT scores around 5k @ 1280@1024 while a 2600 Pro gets around 3400.
So why is the iMac still faster for gaming? The MBP has a better video card, and DDR3 Ram.
Oh, and by the way;
Make sure you lift up the MBP a little bit by wedging something under it, where the screen is.. like, make it slanted XD.. that effectively cools off the laptop by quite a lot. and you'll need it while gaming...
Well, I've done lots of research and most laptop coolers aren't efficient.. not just with the MBP, but with ANY laptops... 🙁
I was looking at the Moshi Zefyr Pro, but I really couldn't justify the price of US$86 just to cool off my laptop...
For now, I just wedge something underneath and turn up the fan to the max. And it works for like 2-3 hours of intense gaming/3D applications.. then it starts to lag... 🙁 But you leave the game off for like 10 min, it's back in the game.. Haha
Anyways, if you have extra $86 to shell out, the Zefyr Pro gets pretty good reviews and seems pretty effective. So go for it XD
And if you're worried about budgetting, keep in mind that 512MB of High-end MBPro isn't as cost effective as the 256MB of VRAM on the base model.
9600M GT operates on 128-bit, so anything more than 256MB becomes not as efficient. Unless you play GTA IV or use lots and lots of 3D Applications and rendering softwares, you won't need the extra 256MB of VRAM.
so, there's another way of possibly saving $400 if you were looking into the 2.53GHz model just for the 512MB of VRAM