Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OUCH. My 6 is very usable with my current score. If you had your battery changed, I think you'd be happy with the performance difference.
[doublepost=1513704725][/doublepost]

How is this crippling? You have a worn battery, change it and the performance is back. I don't understand this argument.

You don't seem to get that people won't know that the poor performance is battery-related.

Why would someone who's getting alright battery life and iOS says the battery is healthy go and spend money to replace the battery? Wouldn't they just assume iOS is running slower on it?

Apple doesn't let anyone know that they throttle based on this, so it wouldn't cross anyone's minds. I'm sure if it were up to Apple, the user would interpret the slow-down as a signal to buy a new phone.

And do you even realize how ridiculous it is to hear things like, oh it's running slow? That's a shame... guess you'll have to buy a new battery or a new phone! How anti-consumer can Apple get?
[doublepost=1513709439][/doublepost]
The multimodal distribution of scores is likely the result of throttling differences that related to different SoH (State of health) batteries being tested. There is a rash of threads on reddit regarding GB4 scores changing significantly after a battery replacement.

He asked where Apple says it, not what you can make by browsing tech subreddits and interpreting Geekbench score distributions. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Applejuiced
It would be so easy if Apple just allowed easy battery replacements.

galaxy-s5-battery.jpg
 
One of the major UK newspapers has run with this now
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/19/apple-iphone-reduce-speed-old-batteries
Let’s see what Apple’s response is beyond “no comment” and which other mainstream news outlets pick it up.

Apple rarely responds to wild speculation.

I'm sure Apple's lawyers would respond if a newspaper accused them of doing something evil though.

Rene Richie has written up a nice explanation and given his thoughts:
https://www.imore.com/why-new-battery-can-breathe-new-life-old-iphones
 
I don't see any evidence that Apple wouldn't consider the batteries in throttled devices replaceable. I'm pretty sure that the phones that are being throttled 50% are below 80% health, but Geekbench doesn't have health data so we can't verify that.

I think the problem is that most people don't understand how batteries work. As batteries age, they don't simply lose capacity, they also see their internal resistance increase. As you pull more current across a higher resistance, the voltage of the battery drops. If the resistance gets high enough and you're pulling enough current, the voltage will fall far enough to force a reset.

The reason for throttling isn't to extend run time, it's to avoid disruptive resets-- which can be annoying to the user but can also cause data corruption.

I think the "replace your battery" pop-up would be a good idea (though I also think the paranoid around here would argue that was an Apple money making scheme). The toggle you're suggesting though wouldn't do what you think it would-- if you turn off throttling you still wouldn't be able to run at full performance, it would just crash when CPU load jumped because it would be pulling too much current and dropping the cell voltage.

I understand the last parts of your reply, and the IR was something I wasn’t considering.

As for the first part of your response, I’ve posted here previously about my personal experience with our iPhone 6 battery that they would not replace the battery, so I know what I’m talking about there.

They need to update their policy and battery testing procedure to more accurately pick up the batteries that are due for replacement under AppleCare.

And they at least need to give us the notification about our worn battery needing to be replaced and that it will result in lowering CPU speed to prevent sudden shutdowns.

It seems their private or hidden algorithms inside iOS, for detecting when a battery is worn enough to reduce CPU speed, are better than the ones they use to tell the customer that their battery is fine, when it’s not fine.
 
Yea, free.

My phone performance is fine and it's nearly 4 years old. If I can have improved performance and get more life out of this old girl for just the cost of a battery, that's a great deal.

Again, not free.

You're paying for something that should never have been taken. That's a horrible deal that sounds more like the mafia than a healthy business practice.

So then I'm right? You would just be whining about your phone dying sooner because your battery is aging. This is like crying about your knees hurting because your 80 years old. Some people take care of their issues, others just complain about anything. You strike me as the later.

Batteries age, deal with it. What difference does it matter with how Apple treats batteries with a poor SoH, just replace it. You're literally on the internet whining because your wear item is wearing.

Nope, you aren't right -- just a bully trying to shut people down and insult them.

I have absolutely no problem replacing a battery that degraded to the point I want it replaced; you're dishonestly trying to put that on me.

Crying about your 80 year old knees would be like crying that the battery is worn -- nobody is doing that. I haven't seen a single post saying people shouldn't have to replace degrading batteries.

iOS is secretly throttling the CPU based on "battery health" while telling the user that their battery is "healthy". You think people should magically know to replace it anyways to get back their CPU performance that they have no idea is being taken in the first place.


Your analogies and reasoning are flawed. I don't know why you're so emotionally married to Apple to treat others with such arrogance and insult.
 
Hey, can y'all cut this **** out? Making it damn hard to read the actual useful content of this thread.


You're right. There's no value continuing that discussion because the the physics behind this are simple.

Energy = Power x Time.

If your cell is degrading, you have less energy. There are two short term solutions

1.) Control the 'Time' component: Reduce the power and and try to achieve the 'Time' of a pristine cell. The result is a phone that's still usable throughout the day.


2.) Do not control the 'Time' component: Do not restrict the power and let the time shrink. The result is a phone that probably doesn't quite operate right because of an increased ohmic drop. The cell will produce more heat because of the increased resistance and this will further exasperate the problem. Your phone will deplete it's charge sooner but you may load your porn faster.

None of this has to do with planned obsolesce or conspiracies. I actually prefer option 1. The real solution is to just change your battery and quit whining about the inevitable. Wear items wear.
 
Last edited:
The phone's got a few other issues (headphone jack doesn't work/only certain chargers work) and if I go down that rabbit hole, I'll end up out a couple hundred bucks and running 2 year old hardware.

That’s what I thought you’d say. We went down that rabbit hole with my daughters iPhone 6 and repaired the screen, ear speaker, microphone and new battery. It ran like new after that on iOS 10.3.3

But now, the minute we upgraded from 10.3.3 to iOS 11.02, the built-in apps would take 4-22 seconds to load, despite multiple restores in iTunes in DFU mode. It’s useless as an every day carry phone now, even with normal geekbench scores and CPU speed, and 0% wear on the new battery.

My son, whose 6 battery was 82% and running slow as a snail, was refused a battery swap at Apple. He bought a 7+ and gave his 6 to me, and once I out in a new battery it was like new. We gave it to his sister and left it on 10.3.3, and I’m stuck trying to fix the snailPhone.
 
Yes, a slow phone is better than a phone that just shuts off at random times. I would see a phone thats always on, as a benefit to one that is not.

You dont make much sense and you know that.
A phone that just shuts off at random times just needs to be repaired.
Weather that's a battery issue or other hardware fault should be rectified by the manufacturer.
Its never acceptable to just slow down my phone because the battery is bad or the battery is starting to get worn out.
If my battery needs replacement I will either charge the phone more often or pay to have the battery replaced if its not under warranty.
But Apple will not even let customers pay to have their battery replaced.
The defective batteries somehow pass their little tests and check out fine so they tell you to just buy a new iPhone.
How convenient :D
 
Last edited:
I know people who owns older iPhones (4s, 5) that have a smoothly software because they didnt updated the iOS from the year they went out. So that puts a different perspective besides the battery theory.
 
I'm curious to hear what it does for you. Can you update me?
[doublepost=1513708630][/doublepost]

The multimodal distribution of scores is likely the result of throttling differences that related to different SoH (State of health) batteries being tested. There is a rash of threads on reddit regarding GB4 scores changing significantly after a battery replacement.

Will do.
 
I haven't noticed any performance degradation at all and i'm happy with how my iPhone 6 performs. If changing my battery improved anything, it would feel like I was getting something for free.




"Throwing money".... You mean replacing a wear item? Is changing your brake pads "throwing money".

Most people change phones every two years or less. I still love my iPhone 6. I don't really feel the need to upgrade. Again, I'm thrilled that all I would even need to do is replace the battery. And quite frankly, I think throttling the CPU on an aged battery is kind of a cool method of dealing with a wear item.



Clearly you cannot. You've been crying about the effects of an aged battery on this thread all day. You could have just gone to the apple store and changed yours by now.



You expect something because that is what you're used to. Things change. Get with the times.




It depends on how you define performance. If somebody else defines performance as how many hours their phone will operate, they would say they have bad performance. And again, with either situation, you strike me as the type of guy that would be crying about it on forums instead of just changing your battery.




Yea, we agreed on this. What's your point.



I have no idea what you are talking about. So obviously you weren't clear.
[doublepost=1513711932][/doublepost]

^THIS


iOS 11 sucked way before this change came to light. This has been the worst OS roll out since Vista.
Thanks for being a voice of reason here. This story intrigues me and may just prompt me to keep my 5S going another year or two with a battery swap.
 
My iPhone 6's performance has sucked large monkey balls for the past year. I've been putting up with it. Yeah, the battery life is crap--I MAY get up to a day, if I'm extremely lucky and don't use it at all, but it's tolerable for how much I travel.

What I didn't expect is that the slowness was coming from a degrading battery. That's like replacing your brakes and gaining 60 horsepower. Weird.

Anyhow, I'd like to see more data in this thread and less rambling.

I just ran Geekbench 4 on my iPhone 6 (non plus) to see if this is going on in my case. The answer appears to be "yes":

Single Core: 1070, Multi Core: 1806.

iPhone 6 should be getting:

Single Core: 1412, Multi Core: 2383

Time to schedule a battery replacement. Now I know why the keyboard takes 2-3 seconds to open, and the camera takes 5 seconds to load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Applejuiced
Depends. If you were in the same situation as apple, do you want to notify the user to replace their battery for $79, and have them use their device for another year, or have the device become really slow to upgrade. My opinion is that while they implemented this as a feature, the by product is people upgrading.

Apple wants $1000 from you, not $79.

For me, I’d prefer 100% performance if that means awful battery life, at least that way I know to change the battery. The current way, I think my phone has had it’s day and needs replacing.

Thats how I feel about control center controls that actually turn off wifi and bluetooth...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Applejuiced
I just did a Geekbench on my old ipad mini retina and no change in performance, so this must be an iPhone thing.

possibly. My heavily used iPad Air 2 ,that is three years old with original battery, benched just fine. They also have larger batteries so it may just be a matter of time.

I'd imagine Apple will have to address this soon, at least give an explanation. Just read article on newsweek about it and cnet. So it is getting more exposure. Maybe cnn, fox , cbs and abc soon.
 
You can ignore this fact, close your eyes, plug your ears and continue to rant, or you could take 10 or 15 minutes, open up 50 apps, open up 60 Safari tabs, put your phone in low power and be amazed at the performance. Or you could spend the next 12 hours ranting. Which is a better use of your time?

50 tabs in Safari? Seriously? I think my old 6+ would burst into flames. I know the wife was pretty pissed at the slowness when she used it for a few days while her 6s was waiting for parts. I know the slowness of it drove me to Android back in March. Now I know why - the battery needed replacement.
 
You dont make much sense and you know that.
A phone that just shuts off at random times just needs to be repaired.
Weather that's a battery issue or other hardware fault should be rectified by the manufacturer.
Its never acceptable to just slow down my phone because the battery is bad or the battery is starting to get worn out.
If my battery needs replacement I will either charge the phone more often or pay to have the battery replaced if its not under warranty.
But Apple will not even let customers pay to have their battery replaced.
The defective batteries somehow pass their little tests and check out fine so they tell you to just buy a new iPhone.
How convenient :D

I’m saying a slow phone is better than no phone. I believe that Apple handled it badly and should have been more transparent. Like getting a notification that says “your battery is going bad, to keep your phone working, your CPU will be throttled. Please get your battery replaced”. Instead of just doing it, it looks bad and makes it hard to determine what Apple intentions are.
 
My iPhone 6 Plus is degraded 18% but it benchmarks 5% higher than stock models, so I don't know what's going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwells1441
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.