Gizmodo iPhone 4 theft investigation closing, charges may be next

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by smithrh, Mar 18, 2011.

  1. smithrh, Mar 18, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2011

    smithrh macrumors 68020

    smithrh

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    #1
  2. FiremanMike macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    #2
    Bottom line is receiving stolen property is a crime. Freedom of the press does not immunize anyone against criminal prosecution when a crime exists.
     
  3. Reach9 macrumors 68020

    Reach9

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    In America
    #3
    But they didn't find the iPhone 5 prototype (final design) yet!
     
  4. Shenaniganz08 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    #4
    I posted this in the original thread but all 3 parties are at fault here

    1) The police did an illegal search

    2) Hogan sold stolen merchandise

    3) Gawker purchased stolen merchandise

    The appropriate thing would have been for Hogan to turn in the phone to the police, and then wait 30 days for it to go unclaimed. It's clear that Apple would have contacted the police the next day and had their stolen merchandise returned
     
  5. lsvtecjohn3 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    #5
    I was just thinking about this today... I really don't care about Gizmodo but whatever happen to the guy from Apple that left the phone at the bar? Does he still work for Apple?
     
  6. wordoflife macrumors 604

    wordoflife

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    #6
    I think if I ever found a prototype iPhone, I'd .... throw it in the fireplace.
     
  7. v66jack macrumors 6502a

    v66jack

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Location:
    London, UK
    #7
    I'm sure I read somewhere that he was on the development team which creates the phone app. I'm sure he still had his job after the story broke. I'm not 100% though, please correct me if I'm wrong.

    Also do Gizmodo get invited to Apple media events? I'm guessing not.
     
  8. Ccrew macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #8
    From the article:
    "Powell's LinkedIn profile says that he's still employed at Apple. Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak publicly came to Powell's defense last year, saying "it's a bad accident that could happen to any of us."
     
  9. syc23, Mar 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 27, 2011

    syc23 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    #9
    Gizmodo and Hogan should be jailed for 5 years. Or at the very least they should pay Apple compensation for profitting from stolen goods.

    Gizmodo and Hogan should be jailed for 5 years. Or at the very least they should pay Apple compensation for profitting from stolen goods.

    Or am I being harsh? :D
     
  10. OutSpoken macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #10
    I still read gizmodo (in classic-guise), I think its an entertaining tech blog.

    The whole lost iPhone 4 malarky didn't prevent me from purchasing one, so I don't really see the harm done... if anything it created MUCH publicity.

    I believe they're still uninvited from Apple events.
     
  11. rwilliams macrumors 68040

    rwilliams

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    #11
    Yep. I think the demand for the iPhone 4 would have still been very high, but I think Gizmodo's leak pushed it to unchartered territory. EVERYONE was drooling over that thing and chomping at the bit to get one.
     
  12. redhead42 macrumors newbie

    redhead42

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Location:
    Virginia
    #12
    They weren't even invited to the Verizon iphone announcement. That's the only time Verizon snubbed them.
     
  13. Applejuiced macrumors Westmere

    Applejuiced

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    At the iPhone hacks section.
    #13
    Yes, you know why;)
     
  14. greg555 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    #14
    It kind of funny that that was some of the proof that Verizon was going to be announcing getting the iPhone.
     
  15. smithrh thread starter macrumors 68020

    smithrh

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    #15
    I have to wonder how they're doing over there at Gawker Media...

    They've had this case over their heads for nearly a year.

    Then a month or so ago they had a severe format change, which I suspect has driven quite a few people away from Engadget, Lifehacker and the other sites.

    I know that I certainly go to those sites much less often than before. Heck, I can't even render some of their pages now on Firefox on an older PC.
     
  16. Applejuiced macrumors Westmere

    Applejuiced

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    At the iPhone hacks section.
    #16
    I think there's an option you can click to have it display the articles in the old way.
     
  17. dccorona macrumors 68020

    dccorona

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    #17
    I didn't think that their search was illegal, but if it was, Gawker can't be prosecuted. If the police violate a law in gathering evidence, that evidence can't be used to convict the person. Unless they have enough without the search, they won't be able to do anything
     
  18. Hype2k2 macrumors 6502

    Hype2k2

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #18
    They had a warrant
     
  19. ecschwarz macrumors 6502a

    ecschwarz

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    #19
    Someone should be locked up for that bad redesign...hey-oooooo! :D
     
  20. rrandyy macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    #20
    There are a handful of exceptions to "the fruit of the poisonous tree." More than one of them likely applies here, as it does in many other cases.
     
  21. Interstella5555, Mar 19, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2011

    Interstella5555 macrumors 603

    Interstella5555

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    #21
    Engadget isn't on Gawker, they did their own funky change a while ago which is why I hardly ever go there anymore. Giz is a bunch of ass hats who think they're the best thing to happen to tech blogging ever, they deserve everything that happens to them.
     
  22. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Cabin by a lake
    #22
    Yep, and Gizmodo did Apple a favor in at least one other way:

    The leak gave people time to get over the dramatic style change.

    Hard to forget how many fans were convinced that "Apple would never design anything that looked like that!"
     
  23. ecschwarz macrumors 6502a

    ecschwarz

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    #23
    That is absolutely true...I remember everyone saying that it was too blocky, too different, and that those "seams" were obviously shoddy workmanship. I think people would've bought it regardless, but could you imaging the iPhone 4 designed by customers who were used to the iPhone 3G/3GS? Rounded off bar of soap with a better camera and front-facing camera...maybe a higher-resolution display, but nobody really was thinking in terms of 300+ ppi.
     
  24. Shenaniganz08, Mar 21, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2011

    Shenaniganz08 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    #24
    the problem is that the early leak of the iPhone 4 caused many people who would have otherwise purchased an iphone 3G or 3GS to see what the next phone is going to look like = lost revenue in those people that would have purchased an iphone 3g/3gs + iPhone 4


    The warrant was illegal, and it was eventually withdrawn

    http://www.geekosystem.com/gizmodo-iphone-warrant-police/

    best explanations of why it was illegal found online

     
  25. sim667 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #25
    I cant believe he sold it for $5000

    I bet you could of got a lot more than that out of another company developing phones.
     

Share This Page