GM has 120 days to live, Ford 7 months.

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by quagmire, Nov 7, 2008.

  1. quagmire macrumors 603


    Apr 19, 2004
    Well Ford and GM's Q3 results have been posted. GM had a cash burn of $6.9 billion and a loss of $2.5 billion. Ford lost $2.98 billion. If nothing changes, estimates have GM lasting 120 days and Ford lasting 7 months.

    While I agree GM and Ford have been mismanaged on a massive scale and they were idiots relying on SUV's and trucks and neglecting their cars, etc. Should the gov't be sitting there and do nothing to help them( give loans, etc with massive stipulations, etc like removal of GM's idiotic board members)? While people may believe in the free market and let the weak die, the free market is going to kill the country due to the thousands of people that will be out of work if GM and Ford fail.{83F94693-8303-4DB1-82FD-8C59C59D7C57}
  2. iGav macrumors G3

    Mar 9, 2002
    It's madness that Ford aren't speeding up the introduction of the One Ford ideology. Get the Ka, Fiesta, Focus and Mondeo in U.S. showrooms now, not 2010. Or they might as well just spin Ford Europe off now, before Ford U.S. sinks the whole shebang.
  3. rhett7660 macrumors G4


    Jan 9, 2008
    Sunny, Southern California

    Not saying it is going to happen, but can you imagine, no Ford or GM at all. Think about that. Wow. If this happens this will truelly be a sad day.
  4. BoyBach macrumors 68040


    Feb 24, 2006
    A NHS-style healthcare system in the US would almost certainly help.
  5. Drumjim85 macrumors 68030


    Oct 7, 2007
    DFW, TX
  6. Unspeaked macrumors 68020


    Dec 29, 2003
    West Coast
    Ford Europe's profit was down nearly 75% this quarter. They're barely breaking even now.

    The only semi-viable division at this point is Ford South America.

    It's all moot, though, since the government will bail out Ford and GM so they can keep throwing their money away making cars no one wants.
  7. synth3tik macrumors 68040


    Oct 11, 2006
    Minneapolis, MN
    Who wants those crappy transmissions anyway?

    I'll take an Audi or a Volvo over a GM or Ford any day.
  8. iGav macrumors G3

    Mar 9, 2002
    But they still made a profit in a period that was defined by a dramatic economic slowdown, with 3 of Europe's largest economies entering into recession.

    Not to mention that the last quarter was the end of a life cycle for 2 of their main products (Ka & Fiesta) one of which (the Fiesta) has only just gone on sale, and the other does not go on sale until 2009, this has had a significant impact on sales (and profits) for the last quarter, as buyers waited for the new models to arrive.
  9. omegaphil6 macrumors 6502

    Jul 19, 2002
    Fort Myers Florida
    They both make absolutely horrid vehicles that look and feel super cheap and run like **** and fall apart... I hope they close shop, it is survival of the fitest.
  10. cantthinkofone macrumors 65816


    Jul 25, 2004
    Missouri, USA
    I like my acura. and will keep buying them.

    I can't believe they are still trying to sell SUVs and trucks here. Everybody has one.
  11. quagmire thread starter macrumors 603


    Apr 19, 2004
    Volvo is owned by Ford. Take a look at the Taurus, it rides on a Volvo platform.

    Have you owned one of their recent products? I have and they are huge improvements and actually compete with the japanese.

    Because people still need them. My family still has a need for a Suburban for towing and hauling 7 people and cargo.
  12. mkrishnan Moderator emeritus


    Jan 9, 2004
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    They would have done this a decade ago had they not made the decision to let Nasser fall on the sword for the Firestone debacle and let Bill Ford run the company. They were even in the process of it -- in the early 2000s, they had the Focus squarely on the Car & Driver top ten list. They should have let Bill Ford fall on the sword and kept Nasser instead.
  13. ChrisA macrumors G4

    Jan 5, 2006
    Redondo Beach, California
    If I were on Ford or GM's board I'd cure this problem by paying all executive level management with a five or ten year deferment. In other words we hold their pay check for five to ten years then the amount of the check is based on how well the company is doing at the time the check is written. This would end their short sightedness very quickly. Of course they would need to eat now, so we loan them money to cover the 5 to 10 year no-pay period. This loan only makes it better because now they are in debt.

    The current trouble is all due to the executives being paid from current quarter results. With the current pay system stupid things like cash incentive to buyers where the cash comes from next quarter and closing plants makes to much sense. If their pay came from five years out accounting tricks would matter less and they would have incentive to invest in R&D and engineering and employee training
  14. Antares macrumors 68000


    Ford makes some great and truly groundbreaking vehicles. It's a great company which has had a bunch of unfortunate missteps....without a doubt, though, it will survive. Ford is one of the cornerstones of the auto integral part of it. GM is another great car company that has had it's fair share of issues. GM has some really good products, both current and planned. A failure of GM would mean a major loss of innovation and design to the auto industry. GM should not be allowed to fail. If the US government will bail out banks, they should do in kind for the auto industry...Extend loans to them so they can move ahead.
  15. NT1440 macrumors G4


    May 18, 2008
    Maybe they should actually live in reality, scale back there damn suv and truck production because almost no one is buying, and give some cars that are innovative, say ones that actually meet higher gas mileage goals? (40 mpg).
  16. TSE macrumors 68030

    Jun 25, 2007
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    The American government should not intervene with any of this. Let the market ride itself, the so called free market should be run like everyday life: the strong and smart outlast the dumb and weak. Make companies more competitive by not intervening so big companies aren't so concerned about ignoring people's needs by making stupid business decisions because the government will just bail them out. Do this, and prices will go down from the competitiveness, people buy more due to cheaper prices, and the economy is much stronger.
  17. SubaruNation555 macrumors 6502

    Dec 3, 2007
    Arlington, VA USA
    Agreed, we need the Focus and Mondeo over here asap!
  18. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    May 19, 2002
    Sort of like what will happen if the company survives.

    Their euro products will hit the US with few changes, lights, bumper, and seats.

    Share about 90% of content instead of the current 10% for the world platforms.

    Think this is what will happen if they survive, they said they'd try to do it. Don't know how realistic it is.


    NHTSA and the EPA are still a roadblock to bringing in a lightly changed vehicle.

    So that hurdle should be smoothed and euro cars imported with as few changes as possible.

    Though in the past this has led to warranty problems with our crap gas like sulfur contamination of the fuel system and exhaust. Plus any NHTSA shortcut would lead to the injury lawsuits for failing to meet US safety requirements.

    Don't know how fast we can crash them for the NHTSA stamp, but the EPA will likely force a US engine into the euro car. So the same crap EPA numbers.
  19. bobfitz14 macrumors 65816


    Oct 14, 2008
    aren't the majority of (US) government vehicles Ford and GM? i would say like 95% (if not more) cop cars are Ford, and don't the Feds drive GM SUV's?

    you would think they'd step in or something..looks like they'll need another source in a couple years if this is true!
  20. NT1440 macrumors G4


    May 18, 2008
    I think that they should allow the loan, provided with conditions.

    Possible conditions:

    Meet new MPG regulations within 10 years or suffer massive penalties

    Scale back SUV/Truck production to actually reflect the demand

    R&D in alternative energy/hybrid car technologies

    any suggestions?
  21. Bargsbeer macrumors member


    Oct 17, 2008
    Central FL
    let the market decide I have to agree. The quality of both is terrible,I drive Honda's and will continue to drive them you can't beat the long term reliability.
  22. quagmire thread starter macrumors 603


    Apr 19, 2004
    GM is scaling back. They are shutting down 4 SUV and truck plants.

    Long term reliability experience with my GM's have been outstanding. If you're basing your opinion on experiences 10-20 years ago, they are outdated and need to be updated.
  23. 11800506 macrumors 65816


    Oct 31, 2007
    Washington D.C. Area
    The problem without intervention is if the companies end up failing, then thousands of Americans are without jobs, sending the economy into worse condition than it already is. And GM is scaling back SUV and truck production as much as they can.

    Recent GM and Ford products actually have become more competitive with the Japanese. Cars such as the new Malibu, CTS, and eventually the Ka, Fiesta, Focus, and Mondeo are all quite nice. I'm not trying to sound like a fanboy for GM as I agree that they were really stupid in their reliance on SUVs and the majority of cars are Japanese (although a new CTS is high on our list for future cars). The simple fact is is that without intervention our economy would be in even worse shape than it is which would obviously not be good.
  24. n8mac macrumors 6502

    Jun 25, 2006
    I still haven't forgiven them for that. I used to love Volvos and always wanted one. Now I just own a Mazda and love it. I would own an Infinity if I could afford it. But I can't complain. A friend of mine has an Acura with almost 300k miles and it still runs great.
  25. joeshell383 macrumors 6502a

    Sep 18, 2006
    Mazda is also owned by Ford.

Share This Page