I had a Mazda with their proprietary map system. It was over $300 for a year's worth of updates. Also, you had to schedule and pay for a service visit to update. I won't go back to anything that hints of that.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			The Google product is called "Android Auto"I don't understand this approach. CarPlay or whatever the google equivalent is, is universal and can be updated easily. It can't be that hard to support. I hate many of the in car navigation systems. Why remove it? Am I missing something. Do car manufacturers have to pay some licensing or something to have it as an option in cars?
Anderson said that GM's in-house infotainment option offers a "much more immersive environment" and can "do so many more things" than CarPlay.
Teslas don't have Carplay, yet they're #1 EV brand other brands are distancing themeselves from Carplay like Rivian.If a lot of people don't buy GM, cause it doesn't have CarPlay, then they have no customers...
 
					
				 www.macrumors.com
						
					
					www.macrumors.com
				In all seriousness, it is the most idiotic statement I've heard from a company in a long time. It's so dumb, that it makes me not want to consider purchasing a GM car, or anything related to GM ever again. If they just said "we don't wan't to support it", fine. But that comparison with Jobs and the floppy disk is straight up idiotic. That person either has zero clue what they're talking about, or they're spouting pure BS.“But frankly, it's a very Jobsian approach to things. The removal of the disk drive, nobody liked that, everybody on the forums and Facebook was complaining about it, but to that he said, "Look, guys, flash storage really is the future. Get on board, you'll see that." That's kind of what we're saying here, in fact that's exactly what we're saying.”
What a silly comparison.
The disc drive was removed so the computers could get thinner and lighter and faster.
What does removing CarPlay get you? It’s certainly not faster or better.
GM understands something I hate about cars these days: car manufacturers are software companies. We're in an era of huge, distracting screens. Car companies that aren't getting really, really good at the whole widget of electronics hardware and software harmony are going to wither away in the long-run. Outsourcing to Apple makes no sense. You can't differentiate against any other CarPlay-using vehicles.
The only Car Brand you can drive without apple carplay is Tesla. NO other brand can out perform Apple Carplay.
No worries. Jobs has been pre-blamed.What are the chances any higher ups from GM even sees all this backlash of their bad decision? It’s definitely been made aware on other news sites with all similar reactions.
GM thinks that they are Tesla. Good luck selling vehicles and enjoy losing customers! Worst decision they ever made!
Or just buy GM.A great response to this from Apple would be “so you all really want us to start making a car ourselves?“