No CarPlay, no car. No doubt GM will make this a subscription model too.
That's some chutzpah right there.But frankly, it's a very Jobsian approach to things. The removal of the disk drive, nobody liked that, everybody on the forums and Facebook was complaining about it, but to that he said, "Look, guys, flash storage really is the future. Get on board, you'll see that." That's kind of what we're saying here, in fact that's exactly what we're saying.
Sell users' data is very lucrative to car companies
![]()
GM Got Caught Selling Its Driver's Data to Insurance Companies; Now It Says It Doesn't
GM says it stopped selling customer driving data to insurance companies, but other automakers still do.www.edmunds.com
I don't understand this approach. CarPlay or whatever the google equivalent is, is universal and can be updated easily. It can't be that hard to support. I hate many of the in car navigation systems. Why remove it? Am I missing something. Do car manufacturers have to pay some licensing or something to have it as an option in cars?
The Jobsian approach was removing features that were already on their way out, to make way for new technologies. Not removing features that are increasing in relevance practically on a daily basis as car makers prove just how bad they are at designing UIs and respecting customer privacy, to make way for additional marketing and data collection opportunities.The Jobsian approach was removing hardware features though, not software. She used a bad example.