They have it. You just have to pay for it.WGAF.
Add PIP to YouTube ffs.
WE do, but the general public doesn't (or couldn't care less). My guess would be, since back then there was so much media attention on it with Facebook, they delayed it since now nobody is really talking about it anymore.I mean, we know Google apps would have egregious privacy policy. So why delay the inevitable?
While App Privacy and allowing users to preventing apps from using advertising identifier are great steps, I would like Apple to extend their efforts by:
- Contacts. Like Photos, I should be able to specify which set of contacts app can access.
- Calendar and Reminders. New add only permission. Most apps should not be able to read my existing calendar events.
- Local Network: A separate setting to allow AirPlay while blocking other local network activities.
They have it. You just have to pay for it.
I'm guessing they are confusing the fact that you can play YT in the background only if you have premium. But playing in the background is not the same as PIP by any stretch.I have premium, it's not on my latest iOS build of YouTube.app.
This is a commonly held misconception.
Won't happen mate, not when Google can charge users for it.WGAF.
Add PIP to YouTube ffs.
yeah this is no good.It has been mentioned already, but just adding my observation to the fold that the toggle for dark mode has been removed. Even Google's documentation says to go to Settings > Themes and then choose Light/Dark/System Default. It seems to have been switched to use the system default no matter what now. I had dark mode enabled for iOS, but specifically disabled for Gmail and a couple others because I don't like the look. After I updated the app, Gmail switched to dark mode with no way to change it.
Won't happen mate, not when Google can charge users for it.
As far as I can tell, every one of Apple's apps already have privacy cards in one form or another... They've added App Store entries for many of the built-in apps that can't otherwise be removed, like Find My, Activity, and Watch, which also include privacy cards, while a handful of other core apps like Photos, Safari, Messages, and Phone that don't have App Store pages are covered on Apple's website.Which court will be the one forcing Apple to create privacy info cards for their own apps? This will be great.
Right?!
I’ve had the same Pidgeon for 2 years.
Should currently be flying somewhere over the Indian ocean delivering my post to Europe
Yeah, this is a new feature - Keep You In The Dark Mode.Gmail switched to dark mode with no way to change it.
Except Google is banned in ChinaI just forward all of my e-mails to the Chinese government directly just to save time.
They do? Go search ANY Apple app on the App Store. They all have the info if recently updated.Which court will be the one forcing Apple to create privacy info cards for their own apps? This will be great.
They don’t need your location to know it’s you. They have your username and password for that. Easily tested by travelling somewhere and logging in. There is no security benefit from your location, rough or not. It’s purely for tracking for ulterior motives.Yes. ROUGH location (the privacy card even says rough) using your IP to verify that you are in fact you logging into your account. A security feature that my app like banking apps use. The app has no GPS permissions. That is why it pops are is this you in this city logging in- it uses your IP address.
And search history of your email searches. That is how it has your prior search terms if you want to go back and do the same search again.
This is the problem with Apple's cards. There is not enough detail to explain to people what is actually going on. Most people have no idea what rough location is for instance.
And since we live in the conspiracy theory era now, more needs to be explained.
For Apple apps that is the conundrum. While they have these they do not reflect the interaction with the OS or its parts. Like all the other apps that have these in the App Store, they are general at best.They do? Go search ANY Apple app on the App Store. They all have the info if recently updated.
They don’t need your location to know it’s you. They have your username and password for that. Easily tested by travelling somewhere and logging in. There is no security benefit from your location, rough or not. It’s purely for tracking for ulterior motives.
Except that the Gmail app doesn't track your location directly — at least not using iOS Location Services. It doesn't use location services at all.They don’t need your location to know it’s you. They have your username and password for that. Easily tested by travelling somewhere and logging in. There is no security benefit from your location, rough or not. It’s purely for tracking for ulterior motives.
You can find that one here: https://support.apple.com/HT211978Wonder when Safari will get one? Oh wait... there is no Safari app in the App Store.![]()
You can find that one here: https://support.apple.com/HT211978
Apple has created web-based privacy cards for all of its apps that don't have App Store pages:
I do agree that they tend to be general, but for the most part, Apple's own apps have to follow the same privacy permission rules as third-party apps do. For example, Safari still has to ask for and be explicitly granted location services access.
It's an imperfect system, but to paraphrase the old saying, Apple has the worst privacy policies — except for all of the others.
Yeah, to be fair I just pasted those in from this Apple support article: https://support.apple.com/HT211970Appreciate it. Wasn't aware those were there.
Yeah, to be fair I just pasted those in from this Apple support article: https://support.apple.com/HT211970
What's odd is that Apple has added some of its otaerwise-uninstallable apps to the App Store, like Find My, Watch, Wallet, and Home, so I don't know why they haven't just created App Store pages for all of them.