£10,000 on a watch that'll be obsolete in a year. Crazy.
Woah the cockiness is strong with this one. How about you refrain from throwing your salary figures out there huh. What I do like is youre consistent with your lying.
If you couldnt afford a million dollar car after 10 years of making "far more than 100k" then youre doing it wrong. Either that or "far more" means 101k to you.
Im not one to make personal attacks, because again, I really dont care about you. But dude you are either a pathological liar, or you are atrocious with financial management and feel you need to overcompensate for something. Either way, best of luck to you
Not one for personal attacks, and then you launch into one?
Not "throwing my salary around." Again, I don't know you (and don't want to) so I'm not bragging. I was just illustrating the point that I knew of what I spoke. I do make considerably more than $100K a year, and considerably less than $200K.
But if you've ever made well over $100K a year you would realize that the expenses of living are usually very different than for someone making considerably less. When someone makes over $100K a year they don't typically live in a $600 month apartment, and drive a Geo Metro. They usually live in the lifestyle that their salary permits. So it's not like I could, or would want to bank $75K a year, while working my butt off, and eating Cheerios and peanut butter.
Plus, I have lived in some parts of the US where my salary, while still relatively high was not extraordinarily high for the area.
And then there is the tax man. I pay more in income taxes every year than over 50% of Americans earn. I think that those taxes are too high, but I am extremely grateful to be fortunate enough to be in that position.
But my original points stand. I think if you were to research it you will find that the vast, vast majority of people making over $100K per year for 10 years would still not be in a position to buy a $1.5 million car. You would also find, if you were to research it that there are plenty of people who work in restaurants and make over $100K a year, thus allowing them to afford an Apple Watch. ;-)
Also, which watch would you suggest for Lee??? WE NEED TO KNOW.
What customer would let the Apple Store employee pretty much make a decision about which watch they want based on a few small tidbits of personal information?
You were clearly working at a subpar restaurant then. I work 20-25 hours a week and can cover rent, car payment, school/school loans and whatever else I need without a problem. A $700 dollar watch is 3 shifts...
Kanye West and Beyoncé are going to love theirs - but what about everyone else in the world?
What would you be doing today with a $15,000 solid gold 1st generation iPad? Exactly.
Stuff like this makes it impossible to defend Apple.
Nope, most of them make really good tips and then screw the rest of us over by not reporting it. Im sure im paying for their obamacare as well seeing as how most make under minimum wage on paper.
Image
...Trendy seems to be the word of the year for Apple instead of something useful like "classic"...
Not in California. Employers are required to pay at least minimum wage and cannot deduct tips from the wages. Which means a server in San Fransisco starts out at $12/hr them gets tips on top of that.
Though it might not be the case in your little myopic corner of the world, but there are cities where the best food service industry professionals (chefs, waitstaff, bartenders) are highly valued. Not all of them make that kind of money, but a few of them do.
If you're interested in knowing more you could always PM me, and I would be happy to put you in touch with some of them. Not sure they'd share their tax forms with you, but if you need something to broaden your narrow horizons they might be willing.
Interesting watch. I had to Google it.
Apparently quite collectible now. Many are still fully working after over 40 years. (In comparison, how many folks are still using an original iPhone?)
What was your point again?
Depends on how much money you have; there are those to whom £10,000 is like mere mortals spending £100, or even £10. The cost won't concern them and when it becomes obsolete they will simply buy the latest model.
Contrary to popular belief, rich people like to keep their money, not waste it .
Your argument comes up all the time in the iWatch discussions, but repeating it won't make it more valid .
The majority of really expensive watches is bought as an investment, just like jewelery, medium expensive watches in the 5k-15k range or so might be an investment or a rich watch person's choice .
Very few people will spend that kind of money on a disposable gadget .
If a server can choose the 3 most expensive model (that's not Edition), and I am having thoughts about "affordability" of those bands... then there is only 1 conclusion...
WE TIP SERVERS TOO MUCH.
The bolded, Apple considers themselves to be a premium brand (what random people think is kind of irrelevant) and they are offering premium products. Nothing the competitors wouldn't try, if they thought there might be a market for such products.
Well ill level with you a bit.
My statement of not making personal attacks was postfaced with a "but" meaning while i dont usually do it nor do i like doing it, i felt the situation may warrant it. But thats aside now no reason to continue that argument.
Im in the same boat salary wise as you are, I live in Washington which is one of the more spendy states. I live well below my needs. Well below. A Bugatti just isnt a good investmentIm my opinion neither is the Apple Edition Watch. I should apologize as you have your priorities and I have mine, neither right or wrong, just different.
Ive done a few different searches on high end restaraunt salaries and supplemented tip income. Not looking good - ****************tHgW2B. This is on top of the knowledge I already have from personal relationships. Ive stated that while its not impossible it is highly improbable and the amount of people in this forum alone that "know" or have themselves made over 100k as a server would be a statistical anomaly. We can agree at least on that much, no?
Yes, we can agree that, statistically there are a lot more people working at McDonalds, Chili's and Outback than Michelin rated restaurants in the Bay Area.
But that still doesn't mean that a person working at a restaurant should be judged as ill suited to afford an Apple Watch. My only point to all of this.
$10,000 for an apple watch, don't make me laugh. For just a little more, I think I will stick with my Rolex Daytona ... $10,000 apple watch, what a joke.
I think the point is not about a server getting an Apple Watch. The issue here is the server is picking between 3 most expensive options (Edition aside) in Apple Watch.
An analogy would be I bought a higher end Rolex than what my boss is wearing and indirectly rub it in their face daily, and meanwhile I am asking to be paid more (like how servers expected to be tip big - the norm used to be 10% for GOOD service, and now they are trying to make you believe standard tips for OKAY service should be 20% or even 30% in some cases - ridiculous and what nonsense!)
Client facing sales and service people should be mindful about giving the impression that they are overcharging clients by flashing their expensive luxury items.