Blue Velvet said:Throwing your toys out of the pram and storming off in a huff is no way to resolve disputes...
edesignuk said:You spammed. It was deleted. Get over it. Why does this have to be made in to such a big issue?
Stop making out you're so hard done by because 4 posts were deleted. Your not the first it will happen to and you won't be the last. Most people seem to be able to deal with it though.
Bye.
No thanks. I think I'll skip it.jesse_james said:Please do everyone a favor and type 'what is spam?' into google.
edesignuk said:No thanks. I think I'll skip it..
You can criticise all you like, and we will talk about why things are as they are, and possible ideas for changes. As I said in the thread you reference, if you have an issue post a thread in here to discuss it.anjaki said:I find this very difficult to digest (particularly the tone), because it implies that even if my argumentation was correct, out of spite it would not even be considered. And if that is the case with this issue, I have no alternative but to believe that this, rather than being the exception, is in fact the rule with any criticism I or any others may level at MacRumours or anything else for that matter, be it right or wrong.
Yes, of course, how silly of me. Not searching google for "what is spam?" makes me ignorant. My sincere apologies.jesse_james said:As long as you're happy to be ignorant on the issue, then so am I.
edesignuk said:Yes, of course, how silly of me. Not searching google for "what is spam?" makes me ignorant. My sincere apologies.
We use the word "spam" very loosely, perhaps it might not be entirely the correct word, but there we go. I still don't see what the big problem is here. Someone else posted 4 OT posts in a row which got deleted. Nothing happened that requires this kind of reaction.jesse_james said:No... but not knowing what it is, does. Especially considering you claim to be some kind of authority on the matter.
edesignuk said:We use the word "spam" very loosely, perhaps it might not be entirely the correct word, but there we go. I still don't see what the big problem is here. Someone else posted 4 OT posts in a row which got deleted. Nothing happened that requires this kind of reaction.
Good job everyone doesn't make such a HUGE deal whenever something gets deleted, we'd never hear the end of it![]()
I'm sorry but I don't see any problem with the tone of anything. As an established member who has been around for sometime they should know full well that posting 4 times in a row is more than frowned upon when the content is not only OT, but "spam" or whatever you want to call it.jesse_james said:The big problem here is plain and simple the tone of your explanations (post problem). Given the user has been a member for some time, and to my knowledge hasn't been a problem in the past, the issue could have been handled by deleting 3 of the posts and a mod edit to explain.
edesignuk said:Why are you even wanting to carry this on?
I totally agree... I read the posts, and although it was clearly spamming (as this is understood in forum rules), but I too think it was a bit haysty to delete all four... maybe Lacero's idea would be a nice, and far from unreasonable, compromise...?Lacero said:I think Anjaki was not spamming, but was just trying to be humorous. It was done in jest, so deleting all 4 posts was a little overboard. Maybe deleting the last three posts and adding a mod note to why it was deleted would have been "nicer".
mad jew said:BTW, I've got a cousin who's three years old, she's given up spitting the dummy, hasn't done it for a good five weeks now.![]()
mkrishnan said:It is, apparently, however, a good place to learn some interesting Oz vernacular!![]()
![]()
![]()