Nexus Q: Look at the Logitech SqueezeBox Touch and that line of products. It's also $299. Is it overpriced?
For me, three things are paramount:
1. How's the touch interface? Must be as smooth or smoother than Apple's.
2. Apps. Must enable me to do everything I can with an iPad, in an equally or exceedingly pleasurable and enjoyable way.
3. Battery life. Again, Apple sets the bar.
It actually looks surprisingly good for a Google product, but am I missing something or is this really WiFi-only? If so, that counts as a fatal flaw, IMO. What on earth is Google thinking hobbling a mobile device by not including mobile connectivity? Strange omission.
That's not android/googles fault. That's your carrier's fault.Androids big failure is lack of updates. I'm still waiting for my Droid Bionic to be upgraded to 4.0. There's no word on when that update will come. I'm tempted to purchase a Galaxy S3. However, how long (if ever) will it take for the S3 to receive the Jelly Bean update...
It's not a strange omission. They had to do that to keep the price low. Just like the Kindle Fire. But here, I don't think being WiFi-only will hurt it too much. Google has a good set of features where you won't miss the 3G/4G too much.
Nexus Q: Look at the Logitech SqueezeBox Touch and that line of products. It's also $299. Is it overpriced?
Google profit from Android
While "some guy" did not necessarily read his email, a service running on the google emails dod "scan" or "read" the email looking for keywords. That is a violation of privacy and most people would assume that you would at least not have code running looking for keywords in your emails.No they did not read your email. You say that as if some guy is sitting there watching you. The ads are based on keywords AUTOMATICALLY picked up. The ads are also non-identifiable.
Seriously, why is this an issue? It's no different to you seeing an iAd advert relevant to the app you have open on your iPad/iPhone.
I believe google is still losing money on google. Its true they receive income for the licensing, but its not enough to cover the money they spend on android.Google profit from Android by licensing the 'GAPPS' package, which is basically the Google apps (Gmail, GCal, Maps (includes an API license), Google Play, etc)
Nexus 7 tablet sounds amazing especially for $199. Still love my iPad 3 but I think I'll start recommending the nexus tablet to friends and family when they're looking of a tablet device. $199 is a steal. Google done good.
With the Q being made in the USA and having a small 25 watt amp, the costs are probably a wash compared to the Touch. And it's cheaper than the Transporter SE.First the squeezebox line starts off much cheaper. However looking only at the squeezebox touch one can immediately justify the price (the large touch screen). The nexus q reminds me of the apple hifi, I believe the nexus q will go in. The same direction as the apple hifi as the design does not tell the user what it does. At least the apple hifi looked like a large speaker
Root and flash, custom Roms (the good ones) are better anyway as the developers make them clean and fast with additional features and cool bits here and there. Stock ICS for example is fine, great OS, but the custom ICS Rom I'm on is much better.I am an Android fan because of Verizon's LTE and because it is a more open OS. For example, I can use the FoxFi app to create a wifi network using my unlimited data, without having to sign up and pay the extra fee verizon charges. That's something (I'm under the impression) iPhone cannot do.
Androids big failure is lack of updates. I'm still waiting for my Droid Bionic to be upgraded to 4.0. There's no word on when that update will come. I'm tempted to purchase a Galaxy S3. However, how long (if ever) will it take for the S3 to receive the Jelly Bean update...
Funny. They lost almost 100 million on Android in 2010. I'm not sure they profit from it even now...
I believe google is still losing money on google. Its true they receive income for the licensing, but its not enough to cover the money they spend on android.
That is a violation of privacy and most people would assume that you would at least not have code running looking for keywords in your emails.
Here's the problem. Yeah, yeah Google released their own tablet, but how many apps will be able to support the tablet?
It's all about apps/OS, not the hardware.
Yawn.
What happens if Google gives a presentation and nobody cares?