Google bean counter: "Apple improved their margins by leaving out the charger? We have to do the same thing!"I’m more interested to read what the Fandroid excuses will be for the lack of charger…
Google bean counter: "Apple improved their margins by leaving out the charger? We have to do the same thing!"I’m more interested to read what the Fandroid excuses will be for the lack of charger…
Hard to argue with that if you were looking for an Android phone.
I’m more interested to read what the Fandroid excuses will be for the lack of charger…
Waiting for all the folks here on MacRumors who expressed outrage over Apple leaving out the charger, to show similar wailing and gnashing of teeth over Google's decision to do the same thing.
That SoC is more than enough for 99% of the usual tasks done in a smartphone. Sure the latest Apple Ax SoCs are beasts, and every new iteration is 500ms faster opening Instagram. But for the majority of non-tech-savvy mortals, they just want something that doesn't get in the way and has great battery life.
Apple stated it so they are to blame.
I could save myself a lot of money if I could stomach Android. Or something as small and dated looking as the SE.
The A12 chip in the XR and A14 chip in the SE makes the pixel a terrible choice.
The A12 chip in the XR and A14 chip in the SE makes the pixel a terrible choice.
Sure it is.
4GB RAM.
Better front and rear cameras. Night mode and sharper.
Gigabit LTE and U1 for AirTags support.
Portrait mode for everything/Deep Fusion.
Improved Face ID angle.
Largest battery capacity of any 6.1" iPhone.
Most people care about having good cameras, a big screen, and great battery life. For $100, that's definitely a boatload.
iPhone 8 and XR have essentially the same camera which turns off a lot of people.
If you want a huge forehead and chin from 2015, baby-size battery, and tiny 4.7" LCD, then sure....
The processor is the only arguable metric there. The rest is hilariously outdated.
It sold well because it is the cheapest Apple phone you can buy; if you wanted an Apple phone and didnt have a lot of money, that was it. Not because it was good "value" to anything comparable in the price range. A huge percent of the world uses lower-spec processor phones just fine every day.
I wish that Apple would make the Mini or SE the same physical footprint of the 5/5s/1st gen SE. That was a perfect sized phone.
Last thing I want to hear is the whining minority wanting the 4 inch same resolution iPhone back
2014 not 2015😉
but the rest of your post though is true. The same method applied to the orifinal
I think it’s a reasonable move. More and more people likely have existing chargers from older phones, or have the option of purchasing a better charger than what is bundled with the phone. The ones provided by Apple at least is rarely ever the best for me and since they tend to sit unused in the box, it’s no real loss to me.
I'm probably not one of those "non-tech-savvy mortals", since I'm on this website, but even for me the 700 series midrange Snapdragon chips are more than enough. Hell, I never had a problem with 600 series which is in the Pixel 3a. Guess what, that 2-year old midrange phone runs just fine, and the UI is as smooth as an iPhone.That SoC is more than enough for 99% of the usual tasks done in a smartphone. Sure the latest Apple Ax SoCs are beasts, and every new iteration is 500ms faster opening Instagram. But for the majority of non-tech-savvy mortals, they just want something that doesn't get in the way and has great battery life.
I'm probably not one of those "non-tech-savvy mortals", since I'm on this website, but even for me the 700 series midrange Snapdragon chips are more than enough. Hell, I never had a problem with 600 series which is in the Pixel 3a. Guess what, that 2-year old midrange phone runs just fine, and the UI is as smooth as an iPhone.
No to mention that to match these $350(4a) - $450 Pixel cameras you'll have to pay Apple at least $750. And that's not going to change since Apple insists on clearly inferior cameras (in addition to ancient designs) for the SE line.
Sorry, I know we're on an Apple rumours fan-site, but $449 is not low-cost![]()
You have not used Android in some time have you. I love iOS and my Apple devices but Android 11 and now 12 run quite nice these days.It's the software that's laggy and not properly proficient/designed! haha!
Smokes? Calm down. My Pixel 2 still out performs my iPhone 12 on a solid 7 out of 10 pictures." the Pixel 5a most closely competes with the $399 iPhone SE, which is $50 cheaper", nah, I would go with the XRfor comparisons which is a bit more, before discounts, but after discounts it is actually probably cheaper for a better phone. Yes it older and doesn't have 5G, but is smokes the pixel everywhere else
Not only let them take the heat, but pile on! I very much remember Samsung commercials saying at least they had a 3.5mm headphone port on their Galaxy line…Seems to have become standard practice for companies to let Apple make unpopular choices, take the heat and hate for it, and when things cool down make the same choice themselves.
Yeah wasn’t there that guy who had a “dual core” member so everyone is already outclassed !99% of normal people phone buyers have no idea what any of the chip specs mean at all; or even what it is called. They could care about what size your member is here boasting about having the best chip today like some dumb tech nerd who spent 2-3 times that on a phone to open apps 1/2 second faster