So true. Everyone thinks webkit is all Apple, but its on KHTML from KDE. Granted some really good changes have occurred since Apple took on webkit, it's still from a Linux based open source project. Apple needs to give back to the community.
The majority of the good work done on WebKit was done by Apple, and how does Apple giving WebKit and all their improvements back to the community on a
regular basis
not qualify as Apple "giving back."
If anyone is going nuts on WebKit stuff without "giving anything back to the community," it's Google.
If not for Apple's work on WebKit and giving it back to the community, Chrome and Android wouldn't be half of what they are.
Also, just because so many have it wrong ... the reason Chrome came out for Windows first and was developed on Windows first is that it was a tiny project by one guy and some friends. They didn't make an official decision to develop such a browser in the boardroom, they merely threw it out there as a tech demo after it seemed like a good idea. They are literally making this stuff up as they go along.
I have no idea why people think this is a good browser, possibly just because of the brand recognition, but due to it's excessive popularity (which actually took Google a bit off guard) they are going to make one for Mac now. If all the dummies out there weren't drooling over it, they might never have got off the ground with it. If people reacted to products like this in a rational way instead of getting all rabid about how Google will "smack down" Safari or some such, it probably would be as popular as Opera, which is to say a niche product of limited acceptance.