ot "paranoia", mate. Just concern for privacy. Paranoia refers to people obsessing over non-existant things. Are you naïve enough to actually believe marketers don't follow you from site to site?
Privacy is overblown. Paranoia on these forums refer to people who don't understand how ad technology works and put a blanket system that they are getting "tracked".
Considering I work and integrate with ad providers directly including SpotXChange, Free Wheel, DFP, etc, yeah you are more than paranoid. The cookies and tracking pixels are what you need to worry the most about. You don't want to be tracked? It's quite simple.
1. Don't log into Google.
2. Disable cookies entirely.
3. Don't log into any website so cookies and pixels can be cross referenced or proxied.
4. If even more paranoid, run Incognito each and every time.
5. Still paranoid? Run Wireshark or Charles and monitor the output of your network traffic from your browser. Please share where you're getting tracked.
If you think the Google Chrome app is tracking you despite all this AND disabling tracking in its settings, feel free to go to Safari and not waste your time posting in this thread.
Yeah except I still want the web to, you know, actually function.
JavaScript at its core just like PHP is susceptible to abuse and exploits if people who code websites don't know how to block their holes. Some of the more annoying exploits actually happen on Safari. If you are complaining about privacy but have JavaScript enabled, then it's an oxymoron.
Yeah, I don't know, they felt bugged about it enough band together and complain to Apple. And plugins? The vast majority of users don't know or care to nerd out and install plugins. But if the browser default is to prevent cross-site tracking, that matters.
I guarantee you through proxying, I can still do cross-site tracking with referrals. The browser default only mitigates the default behavior, but companies/people that do cross-site tracking already have proxy servers set up so that they can continue to skirt around this if they wanted to. Obviously this comes at a cost from a server upkeep, but if they want to "identify" you, they can.
Of course I'm not saying Safari is the only browser with good privacy controls -- but it's the native browser on all iOS devices. You don't think marketers care about the browser the most affluent tier of consumers use on mobile?
Native sure. Most used on mobile? No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers
It's the same principle of why there are less viruses on MacOS vs Windows. Numbers. If Macs were safe from all exploits, you wouldn't have JAMF and other IT services encouraging antivirus on Macs.