Would you rather have 2-4 hour battery life (that's what people get when the GPS is left on)?![]()
Well currently on my 3GS i get about 4 hours of usage in a day. Kinda sucks! I might hit up the apple store and have them check it out.
Would you rather have 2-4 hour battery life (that's what people get when the GPS is left on)?![]()
Would you rather have 2-4 hour battery life (that's what people get when the GPS is left on)?
Of course, it might be better to have a background app (if one were to be allowed) that polled every 5-10 minutes or so.
Have you tried rebooting the phone? With my old 2G, I'd have to reboot periodically, because something seemed to be stuck, running in the background.Well currently on my 3GS i get about 4 hours of usage in a day. Kinda sucks! I might hit up the apple store and have them check it out.
Well currently on my 3GS i get about 4 hours of usage in a day. Kinda sucks! I might hit up the apple store and have them check it out.
I don't think they'll do it, but the loopt folks would probably just have to do a forced, periodic push, which would force the iPhone to update its location. (This does, of course, assume that the push API allows for "silent" push -- that is, a push event that doesn't force the display of a pop-up message box. As I'm not a developer, I don't know if this is true.)honestly, the best thing that could happen is Apple picking something up like this and incorporating it into their 'Maps' app. I will continue using loopt. but if every iPhone user had latitude built in to their Maps program.. that would be pretty amazing
Have you tried rebooting the phone? With my old 2G, I'd have to reboot periodically, because something seemed to be stuck, running in the background.
Isn't 4 hours of usage in a day kind of a lot? I mean, people generally work 8 hours a day, so where do you find time to spend a constant 4 hours on the phone? Assuming your accessing the web and some intensive apps, 4 hours of usage isn't bad. Maybe its just me but I usually am lucky if I clock in 2 hours of usage a day.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)
Wooot!!! But would preffer it more on the actual google app
Ok so for the past hour i had latitude running in mobile safari with safari minimized and with the phone locked. I was checking from my web browser and no updates. I turned on the phone but did not go into safari, still no updates. I went into safari and the site was already there, and it updated. I hope that we don't have to have it up to update, that defeats the purpose. Oh well, why can't apple just have apps run in the background. Sucks.![]()
can someone try using Backgrounder to enable safari even more to work in the background?
Until google adds journaling and pictures (and makes it work in plain google maps outside iGoogle), loopt is still better.
But loopt doesn't run in the background on the iPhone, Latitude does! But really the thing that makes either of these services good is if you have friends on them. The more friends you have the better the service is, either one.
Doesn't even have an icon when you try to add it to the home screen. I'm disappointed. Google gets a fail with this one. Please try again Google.
I wasn't impressed with this. They need to add this capability to google maps, instead of writing a web application.
We worked closely with Apple to bring Latitude to the iPhone in a way Apple thought would be best for iPhone users. After we developed a Latitude application for the iPhone, Apple requested we release Latitude as a web application in order to avoid confusion with Maps on the iPhone, which uses Google to serve maps tiles.
For being a web app is looks really good. Works for me!!!!
Apple should have allowed them to incorporate this into google maps in 3.1. They should also have allowed them to respond to request in the background like mobileme's FindMyiPhone.
eg.) Friend requests your location, google sends request to phone, maps runs gps in the background and feeds back location then shuts off gps, location presented to friend.
This is the only way you could actually save battery and have it working as intended.
Would have been even better if apple had difference levels of friends... Those in the top level are able to request your location without your intervention. Those in the level below require your approval first (push notification to maps app) and you either deny or allow your location to be uploaded.
Apple should have allowed them to incorporate this into google maps in 3.1. They should also have allowed them to respond to request in the background like mobileme's FindMyiPhone.
eg.) Friend requests your location, google sends request to phone, maps runs gps in the background and feeds back location then shuts off gps, location presented to friend.
This is the only way you could actually save battery and have it working as intended.
Would have been even better if google had different levels of friends... Those in the top level are able to request your location without your intervention. Those in the level below require your approval first in the form of a push notification to the phone and you either deny or allow your location to be uploaded.