about time...
Out of curiosity, why?This.
Exactly what I've been waiting for instead of using the Google Drive app.
about time...
Out of curiosity, why?This.
Exactly what I've been waiting for instead of using the Google Drive app.
...(still no editing for tables embedded inside Docs for example)...
I disagree, strongly.
There are two things that matter in picking an office suite:
1 - How easy is collaboration?
2 - How capable is the suite of making great looking documents?
For the first category, Google wins, no competition. It's what their claim to fame is and always has been - it's what they've been focused on from day one. Without that, the entire world would have scoffed, shoved it aside, and kept using Office. iWork is better than Office in this category, but the synchronization is quite buggy when multiple people are editing a single document - it'll regularly see simultaneous edits as being mutually exclusive, even though they have nothing to do with each other, and thus force you to pick one edit or the other, not both.
For the second category, Apple and Microsoft's suites are about as capable of each other. The major difference is that with Apple, it's incredibly easy whereas I have to search through help manuals on a regular basis to make even trivial style changes in Office. Google is in an extremely distant last place in this category. It's okay for presentations (although even then, it's far inferior to PowerPoint and Keynote) but I'd never seriously consider making anything more than a trivial spreadsheet in it or a short, 1 or 2 page list just for internal usage, in the word editor.
Apple is poised to have inarguably the best software - they just need to fix synchronization issues in collaboration.
Oh, and you guys may not realize it, but IBM still makes Lotus. I had always assumed that died when Microsoft made Office, but I was wrong. It's easily the worst productivity suite in existence, but IBM requires all IBM employees to use it.
I disagree, strongly.
There are two things that matter in picking an office suite:
1 - How easy is collaboration?
2 - How capable is the suite of making great looking documents?
For the first category, Google wins, no competition. It's what their claim to fame is and always has been - it's what they've been focused on from day one. Without that, the entire world would have scoffed, shoved it aside, and kept using Office. iWork is better than Office in this category, but the synchronization is quite buggy when multiple people are editing a single document - it'll regularly see simultaneous edits as being mutually exclusive, even though they have nothing to do with each other, and thus force you to pick one edit or the other, not both.
For the second category, Apple and Microsoft's suites are about as capable of each other. The major difference is that with Apple, it's incredibly easy whereas I have to search through help manuals on a regular basis to make even trivial style changes in Office. Google is in an extremely distant last place in this category. It's okay for presentations (although even then, it's far inferior to PowerPoint and Keynote) but I'd never seriously consider making anything more than a trivial spreadsheet in it or a short, 1 or 2 page list just for internal usage, in the word editor.
Apple is poised to have inarguably the best software - they just need to fix synchronization issues in collaboration.
Oh, and you guys may not realize it, but IBM still makes Lotus. I had always assumed that died when Microsoft made Office, but I was wrong. It's easily the worst productivity suite in existence, but IBM requires all IBM employees to use it.
A simple fact destroys your entire argument in terms of productivity suites:
Office is available on both Windows and Mac, in addition to Windows and iOS mobile platforms. iWork is available on Mac and iOS platforms.
The closed ecosystem nature of Apple products will trap iWork from being able to break into the mainstream and explode into the corporate world, which revolves mostly around Windows PCs.
And for the record, subjectively, I think Pages and Numbers are substantially dumbed down versions of Word and Excel. I don't think highly of them, especially when I need to compute advanced quantitative statistics. Numbers is embarrassingly under-powered to be a legitimate contender to Excel.
iWork for iCloud is available for people stuck on PCs. Send me your "advanced quantitative statistics" file and I'll compute it for ya...on my iPhone with Numbers.
How does this differ from the Google Drive app that can create and edit spreadsheets.
![]()
1. Office is already installed in most work-issued computers. And considering most people in the company are using the same productivity suites, why would I use iCloud.com? If you work in a company where 50+ employees have immediate access to Office and have established Office as the standard, why would you use iCloud.com to collaborate with them?
2. On your iPhone, please create a pivot table from a set of sales reports to show total sales returns for each product by market. Then, use that pivot table to identify the salesperson with the best monthly numbers, and individual sales numbers of that rep across the entire catalog of products available.
In addition, if I were to send you a Word presentation for a new product proposal for review, could you track changes for me?
And Pages can track changes.
1. Office is already installed in most work-issued computers. And considering most people in the company are using the same productivity suites, why would I use iCloud.com? If you work in a company where 50+ employees have immediate access to Office and have established Office as the standard, why would you use iCloud.com to collaborate with them?
2. On your iPhone, please create a pivot table from a set of sales reports to show total sales returns for each product by market. Then, use that pivot table to identify the salesperson with the best monthly numbers, and individual sales numbers of that rep across the entire catalog of products available.
In addition, if I were to send you a Word presentation for a new product proposal for review, could you track changes for me?
1. It's free in both price and bloat.
2. Spreadsheet calculations were calculated long before pivot tables were introduced. Is it a useful tool? Yes. Can it be calculated without it? Probably.
While Numbers does not do Pivot Tables, some of the functionality can be done with categories. Here is one way. http://macmost.com/pivot-tables-in-iwork-09-numbers.html
The video is old but the same can be accomplished with the new app.
And Pages can track changes.
We did it because it was a top down policy decision, given we did a cost analysis (using Excel) and found we saved a very substantial amount on our IT budget over the life of the hardware by not having to pay for Windows, Anti-virus, and Office licenses for each machine. So we converted to Macs and use iWork as the official primary productivity suite.
Good example - pivot tables are the one thing I want Numbers to be able to do, but at the same time that is actually the only thing I miss. That and Find-Replace within a formula.
However, in reality, that sort of analysis is most effectively done inside of your CRM solution as backend database queries and shown on a nice realtime modern dashboard. If your CRM can't do the analysis you describe above, you should probably find one that can (even the free open source community edition of Sugar CRM can do this, check it out) - this is exactly what CRM's are for. Doing that sort of thing manually in Excel today seems so 90's.
You're right, but isn't realtime collaboration the direction this is going in? iWork is actually ahead of Office in this regard. Pages can track changes, but Word's implementation is better, and in situations where realtime is not possible, track changes is currently king.
The idea that compatibility plays a big role is only true when you look at it from the bottom up. Exactly like one may feel one can't use iWork at work because everyone else is using Office, and your boss uses Office, if a top down decision is made, then suddenly you can't use Office because your co-workers and your boss are using iWork.
If I am sending something external is is always PDF or HTML anyways. I never send an editable file to an external party unless it is our auditors, and they get excel files exported from iWork.
----------
Nice, very useful info - the real question is, can I still do this with the new Numbers?
Luckily something inconsequential like that has no effect on the functionality/usefulness of an app.Again with the horrible, fake 3D bevel on the app icon. Luckily I have no intention of using these apps.
Oh, and you guys may not realize it, but IBM still makes Lotus. I had always assumed that died when Microsoft made Office, but I was wrong. It's easily the worst productivity suite in existence, but IBM requires all IBM employees to use it.
How are these apps really different than the Google QuickOffice app?