Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I mean this is how far ahead Google is than Apple Intelligence.
That said, integrating specific GI into AI might end up being the better play.
 
Good to see all the changes. Apple has a lot of catching up to do in the AI department and waiting to see what happens at WWDC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
What AI is needed? Some things like real time translation of language can be useful. But what else is useful?
Lately Gemini has saved me a lot of time with my reply to an inquiry from the tax office and just few nights ago I used it to create test exam questions from the textbook for my son’s upcoming biology exam.

I was very sceptical of AI for a long time (and still partly am) but it has also become important every day tool for me that helps with many things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dominiongamma
I just hoping the AI will help Siri tun off the only light in the house without having questions about which room to turn off.
 
I just hoping the AI will help Siri tun off the only light in the house without having questions about which room to turn off.
Or telling siri to stop and not needing to tell me "one moment" "still trying" then after 45 seconds finally stopping the music.
 
Good to see all the changes. Apple has a lot of catching up to do in the AI department and waiting to see what happens at WWDC.
They had better have a ‘hands on’ for those invited in person afterwards, so that they can confirm that it works.

And not a demo on rails where they can only do certain predefined tasks either.
 
Does that really happen? I guess they need to clear out the EXIF data before posting. Wonder if they have Apple logo stickers covering the Google/Samsung/etc logos on their Android phones. Like George Costanza said, “It’s not a lie if you believe it.” lol

Yes, it really does. Along with the "I will never use a Windows machine" people who post a pic of their new Apple Watch with the Dell or Lenovo in the background showing MacRumors...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: conmee
What AI is needed? Some things like real time translation of language can be useful. But what else is useful?
AI will replace search - both on device and on the internet. You won't be putting in keywords and clicking on what you hope is the right link. AI will understand your question better and give you a better answer. This mostly works now (still hallucinates though), but it's only going to get better. I'd say I'm 50/50 on using Google search vs AI search now.

I don't care for it, but people love editing their photos with AI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolfactor
I have strong, adverse opinions on both Google and AI. Short of fleshing them out here, I'll just say that (for very good/first-hand reasoning) I do not have any Google apps on any of my devices. Translation: F Google.

That established, and anyone who knows me knows this next statement is so counter to my being, I agree with Google. There I said it. I need a shower. Right or wrong, OSes, as we've known them, are dead. So too are single-use apps and app stores. Over the next decade, launching an app to achieve a task will feel akin to printing out MapQuest directions to get to your destination: antiquated af. Apps will be replaced by Agents. App Stores by Subscription models. Operating Systems by Intelligence Systems (to borrow a term from the OP). Instead of spending so much time face-down in your device, inputing information, bouncing between apps, the dynamic will be much more heads up and conversational - working with your device to achieve desired results. Intelligence Systems (IS) will be enhanced by new agents, delivering new features/capabilities. Want the latest Agents on your iPhone? There's an Apple One tier/bundle for that. I'm just spit-balling, obviously. Broad-stroking for fun.

That aside, I'm super curious Apple's take on the future of OSes, apps, app stores and the stickiness of their ecosystem. In this fictitious IS-powered future, I suspect security - or at least the strong perception of - will likely be their main differentiator/what they could lean into most. "Trust us. We've vetted these agents to ensure as safe and intuitive an experience as you’ve come to expect from Apple. We think you're going to like it (or whatever catchphrase Ternus will coin)." The only certainty I know is that these are some super interesting times. Warts and all.


Edited to address a typo. I hate typos.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: BigDO
Is Google the "new" Apple with this Gemini Solutions? And is the GoogleBook the MacBook Killer?!

Photocopiers in full operation at Google.

- Gemini Intelligence = Apple Intelligence (v2)

- Glowing rainbow around screen elements when AI is active.

- Does the new Android Auto look just like the CarPlay of today?

- Googlebook = MacBook

But there are two things Google keeps creating cringe on... those side-shot camera angles when people are talking, and trying to be too cool by using 'ugh' celebrities.
 
Temporarily. Apple will roll their own models eventually.
Maybe in 5+ years? Apple is too far behind right now. They didn't build out the required infrastructure themselves, and all of the major hyperscalers are already booked for others. Apple doesn't want to repeat what happened with Maps, so they cannot launch with something inferior (and I would argue that Gemini is already a 3rd rate product behind Chat and Claude).

The best thing they can hope for if they want to do this is to just buy Anthropic, but Claude is getting more expensive by the minute, and they would likely get hit by EU regulations to stop this.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: coolfactor
Maybe in 5+ years? Apple is too far behind right now. They didn't build out the required infrastructure themselves, and all of the major hyperscalers are already booked for others. Apple doesn't want to repeat what happened with Maps, so they cannot launch with something inferior (and I would argue that Gemini is already a 3rd rate product behind Chat and Claude).

The best thing they can hope for if they want to do this is to just buy Anthropic, but Claude is getting more expensive by the minute, and they would likely get hit by EU regulations to stop this.

Wrong. I'm assuming you're defining "being behind" as referring to chat-based interactions? Apple has already built so much AI-powered technology across their products and platforms, and their goal is to make it "invisible". That's why Macs were such a magical experience back in the 80's...

Want to organize your files? Just drag a picture of a file onto a picture of a folder. Seems so simple, but the real technology is hidden behind that natural experience.

Apple is approaching AI the same way. Siri is behind with getting a "generative" upgrade, yes, but it will be time worth waiting, because we've all seen the embarrassment and cringe-worthy missteps that the big AI labs have made. Apple was very smart to proceed with a calculated approach.

Besides, how many people using Claude, Gemini, etc are doing so on Macs? Apple benefits regardless of which AI is used.
 
Maybe in 5+ years? Apple is too far behind right now. They didn't build out the required infrastructure themselves, and all of the major hyperscalers are already booked for others. Apple doesn't want to repeat what happened with Maps, so they cannot launch with something inferior (and I would argue that Gemini is already a 3rd rate product behind Chat and Claude).

The best thing they can hope for if they want to do this is to just buy Anthropic, but Claude is getting more expensive by the minute, and they would likely get hit by EU regulations to stop this.
EU cant tell one American company it cant buy another American company, I guess they could ban apple, best of luck trying that EU
 
I love how most people here think people outside of this hate bubble don't like AI ahahahaha It's literally the most used apps nowadays.

I bet they think people also hate Elon Musk and all the other things that come with people like that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.