Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But I really strongly dislike the concept.

I like having my movies... and music... and everything else I use when not on the internet, right here.

Google underestimates the importance of localized storage.

Agreed. The result of this OS is that Google is in physical possession of your data. If I were involved in any sort of confidential, legal, creative, or trade secret related work, I wouldn't touch this.
 
Great, now Google will have all of our personal files too. :rolleyes: And unfortunately people don't have access to an internet connection wherever they go... I'll stick with a hard drive for now.
 
You know what device I'll stick with for "internet only" when needed? My iPhone. A "secondary computer" has become pointless to me because of my phone.

That is a really good point. Google are clearly thinking of this as a Netbook OS, but what if Netbooks gets squeezed between a full powered desktop computer on one side and an app-phone on the other. There's really no need for a third computer.

You have your powerful 27" computer at home for making your home videos and what not, and your phone for all your social networking needs, and Apple sells them both and makes them work together seamlessly.
 
I'm sorry, but I don't really like this idea at all. Just way too easy to poke holes into it (like someone else said... if no Internet then the computer is useless?).

It would not be "useless" without an internet connection. It will make extensive use of HTML5 for local app storage.

"offline modes, background processing, notifications, and more"
 
But I really strongly dislike the concept.

I like having my movies... and music... and everything else I use when not on the internet, right here.

Google underestimates the importance of localized storage.

It wouldn't be hard to overcome that. I don't know what Googles complete intent is but think of this idea-

The OS is accually a Linux varient. Imagine a web server running locally serving a word processor, music player, basic file browser etc. That solves the issue of remote vs. local storage, but still keeps the user experience web based.

I wouldn't want it for my only machine, but it could be very useful as a laptop.
 
Looks like it could be good for Netbooks or Tablets, nothing for Apple or MS to get too worried about yet. This type of device may become very popular for most of the computing that most people do, most of the time.
 
Wasn't happy to hear google is committed to Flash. Not surprised, but Flash really sucks and needs to go away.
 
No, let's not delude ourselves.

There would be a 17 page thread of people whinging and moaning about this missing feature and that missing feature and how it won't work in xyz scenario. Then someone else will bring up how Apple is losing their touch and going crazy.

And in the time it took to read the above, the thread would be at 19 pages.

Don't forget the incessant, "will it work with my iPhone, I mean MY iPhone?"

or

People debating whether Apple did it first

or

Whether their safari is snappier.
 
Except for the first part, where they spend like 3 or 4 sentences explaining what your web browser is. A bit insulting these days.

Apart from the people who think the big blue e is the internet.

Which may have been their target audience.
 
I like this idea for netbooks or secondary machines. Obviously, everyone won't have a need for something of this nature, but it could make a big splash amongst netbook users. Microsoft should be concerned about this.
 
Looks kinda neat and a good alternative for netbook owners.

However, I don't think i'll be getting one for two reasons:
1) iPhone
2) Apple Tablet

Those who are getting it, I don't think they will be dissapointed. Looks very promising.

Yes but will the tablet from apple play flash or will it be crippled and force you to purchase FREE TV shows via iTunes?

Thanks.
 
It would not be "useless" without an internet connection. It will make extensive use of HTML5 for local app storage.

"offline modes, background processing, notifications, and more"

You didn't watch the video.
"NONE of it will be stored on your computer"
"What?"
"Really none of it?"
"Yeah, nothing is stored on your computer"

Don't conflate HTML5 with Chrome/Chrome OS.
 
Except for the first part, where they spend like 3 or 4 sentences explaining what your web browser is. A bit insulting these days.

I think it's great when a massive, complex, technology company can simplify their plans into an easy to digest video for EVERYONE. Those who are insulted think the video was made only for them.
 
I have some doubts about the real-world viability of Chrome OS, but I love the fact that people are thinking in creative ways about these sorts of things. I do think, though, that some amount of user-accessible storage is necessary for those times when you can't get internet access. At the very least, the ability to put a few songs and documents on it rather than in the cloud, so you aren't suddenly saddled with a big paperweight.
 
I like this idea, I like the idea of taking like 7 seconds to boot up and getting straight on the internet if alls you need to do is check an email or do something online. This would be great to put it on my Macbook via bootcamp and only switch to it if I just need to do something quickly online. However it would be useless to have it as a primary OS for the reasons people have mentioned. Liking the concept though.
 
Considering 99% of the things you can do with ChromeOS requires the Internet in the first place, I'm not sure what you were expecting to do otherwise...

I think all the "whiners" need to watch the video a few times, and maybe read the article over. It's a very different concept in a OS. I don't think they get it.
 
Why isn't Apple doing this instead of fumbling around with "more reliable disk eject"?
 
Seems Google wants to push MS out of the low end.

Or they want to tackle a pretty big reality. I wouldn't mind having a REAL mobile computer that didnt need all the hassle as my MacBook Pro. I am not replacing my laptop, I am adding a feature specific netbook to keep connected and not have to worry about losing EVERYTHING or not having my work backed up on a fully functioning, complete mobile machine. It makes so much sense, it hurts having to explain it.

Why isn't Apple doing this instead of fumbling around with "more reliable disk eject"?

I think they did when they created MobileME, and started shopping for online storage...
 
This is really only for people that do nothing other then email and social network...

Which sounds like 99% of all Mac users... Or all consumers, for that matter. Chrome OS will be perfect for them. And Google has the advantage that they don't have to sell pricey hardware at the same time. This thing will take off like a rocket when it is released. Most young people spend their time exclusively online and do nothing on a local system anymore. You know - just like all those iPhone and netbook kiddies out there.
 
I remember when....

I remember when....

1) A Telephone - nah! No ones gonna talk to a piece of plastic, people like to talk face to face, and always will.

2) A Microwave - nah! No ones gonna want their food cooked by 'magic', people like to use the oven.

3) The Car will rule the world - nah!.... you get the idea!!!

You people complain, whinge, and disss as much as you like, you are not the market Google are targeting. You are stuck in your ways.

Google ain't stupid, they never have been. They know exactly what they are doing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.