New slogan: "Just don't get caught!"
And $22.5 million is a pathetically small fine, won't deter them from this kind of stuff in the least. New slogan: "Just don't get caught!"
What do we, the Safari Users get for our privacy being violated?
Somewhere between jack and *****.What do we, the Safari Users get for our privacy being violated?
So where's my share of the money? I'm the one who's got his privacy violated.
How much ad revenue to Google receive as a result of this practice?
They still are. Innovating more ways to liberate dollars from your internet habits.![]()
Not just your data. Everyone's data.
Remember the Street View debacle of collecting Wi-Fi passwords and email addresses? And then, when asked by the FCC to delete the data, they didn't?
Am I the only one here that sees this as Apple suing someone else for their own mistake?
Apple just got away with adding a feature to block google that didn't block google and instead of fixing it, they just decided to sue google instead.![]()
Am I the only one here that sees this as Apple suing someone else for their own mistake?
Apple just got away with adding a feature to block google that didn't block google and instead of fixing it, they just decided to sue google instead.![]()
Am I the only one here that sees this as Apple suing someone else for their own mistake?
Apple just got away with adding a feature to block google that didn't block google and instead of fixing it, they just decided to sue google instead.![]()
Apple said that if you INTERACTED with an ad (by clicking somewhere in the ad), you agreed to let that company place cookies on your machine.
Google made the INTERACTION automatic - without you clicking a darn thing! They made the clicks 'for you' with a script, and didn't tell you they did it!
Therefore, Google got more 'hits' on their ads, and more 'viewers' of their ads which is illegal. It's much like your TV turning channels automatically to view ads when you're not at home, and Neilsen tracking the activity, thus increasing 'ratings'.
Am I the only one here that sees this as Apple suing someone else for their own mistake?