Guess Netflix also ripped Apple off with their PS3 app.Are you implying that horizontally scrolling images of the movie covers on a widescreen display is Apple innovation now? That's basically the common theme there.

Guess Netflix also ripped Apple off with their PS3 app.Are you implying that horizontally scrolling images of the movie covers on a widescreen display is Apple innovation now? That's basically the common theme there.
And yet, I bet it will still ship with a remote control with hundreds of buttons on it and the networks will all still prevent streaming of content to it.
I didn't realise you could by television sets with an Apple TV built in. Could you enlighten me as to when this change happened?
lol.you know, if i dollar every time someone said x copied y on an apple forum, i'd spend my newly acquired riches on plane tickets, so i could fly out to these peoples houses, and punch them in the arm. And by punch, i mean one of those punches you throw with a knuckle out. Those hurt really bad.
Then i would say "shut up. You're dumb"
then i would walk away.
And it would be worth it.
Great way to see the world, at the very least.
Hey genius, why would I need that when I have a $99 apple tv with much greater functionality that works beautifully in tandem with my iPhone? My iPhone can control the device, as well as stream content on iPhone directly through the ATV to my TV. If the Apple TV breaks, I can easily replace. And if it were IN THE TV, I would need to take the whole TV in for service or replace the TV. Lastly, if there is a significant hardware / model upgrade I replace a $99 device, not my whole frk'n TV. This is a no brainer.
Could Apple bypass the US cable operators and internet TV problems by going down the satellite route? Add a satellite receiver integrated into any Apple TV and you get access to all the channels you want in good quality. Add sat broadband for iCloud streaming, iTunes rentals, internet streaming (eg sports results) and away you go. One Apple Television, one remote, no boxes. I don't know about the US but in the UK sat tv is more popular than cable tv.
Actually, considering these interfaces are from PBS's devs and Netflix, no, I'm not implying anything about Apple. Incredibly, they don't write all the apps on their devices. I AM, however, implying that it's interesting that the left panel is VERY familiar-looking, as well as the specific breakdown of categories and identical glowing blue box just like the Netflix interface. At least they don't have a "Donate" button in the upper right corner. After WebOS, Mango, and MeeGo (hell, even the Xbox dashboard), I really REALLY don't want to hear more nonsense from Google fans about how "there's only one way to do it."
So it bothers you when Google does the same overall interface as everyone else, but not when all the other developers used it? I'm seriously confused. Does it bother you that Chrome has the address bar at the top, too?
Finally! I am so glad that I grabbed one SONY 46 for 599.99 pre-tax in Sep. when it was on sale in Frys
Thats why Google TV is selling better on Amazon than Apple TV, huh? lol. Again, it is the better device for the money.
Yea, shame on me. Go do a search on Amazon...Are you honestly going to sit here and lie about which one is selling better?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-28/tech/30082686_1_google-tv-flop-modest-sales
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374595,00.asp
Shame on you.![]()
I just did. What are you talking about — you mean how the Logitech Revue is #1 in Digital Media Devices (which doesn't include the Apple TV), or #5 in Television & Video (to the Apple TV's #8 rank)?Yea, shame on me. Go do a search on Amazon...![]()
Must be since the Revue, Roku devices and Boxee Box are all in the same categories but the current generation Apple TV is nowhere to be found. I'm curious on how Amazon classifies the Apple TV. The older generation Apple TV devices ARE listed with those three and are understandably well, well behind.I just did. What are you talking about you mean how the Logitech Revue is #1 in Digital Media Devices (which doesn't include the Apple TV), or #5 in Television & Video (to the Apple TV's #8 rank)?
Yeah, unfortunately for you, looking at subcatgories doesn't tell you the whole picture; those only register sales for that specific category. Let's look at the bigger picture. Since we can't look past the top ten in all of Amazon, the next biggest category is Electronics.
And, oh hey, look Apple TV is #14 in Electronics sales.
Roku devices come in at #21, #34, and #40 and the Logitech Revue is nowhere to be seen. Weird.
It must be a glitch.
While the Amazon Best Sellers list is a good indicator of how well a product is selling overall, it doesn't always indicate how well an item is selling among other similar items. Category and subcategory best seller lists were created to highlight an item's rank in the categories or subcategories where it really stands out. We choose a few of the most popular subcategories in which the item has a high ranking in relation to other items in that subcategory, and showcase the item's rank on the product page. As with the main Amazon Best Sellers list, these category rankings are based on Amazon.com sales and are updated hourly.
Are you honestly going to sit here and lie about which one is selling better?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-28/tech/30082686_1_google-tv-flop-modest-sales
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374595,00.asp
Shame on you.![]()
Step 1: MacRumors posts something about Google/Android
Step 2: A bunch of people who have never used anything but the MacBook Pro and iPhone that their parents bought for them yell about how Google copied Apple and the Google device/software that they've never used is a piece of garbage.
Step 3: Some other people post pictures "proving" that Google directly copied Apple. Aside from a few similarities that you see in every comparison of two technologies, the images look nothing alike.
Step 4: People who have actually used both Apple and Google-powered devices/software post rational comments that are based in reality.
Step 5: A bunch of people who have never used anything but the MacBook Pro and iPhone that their parents bought for them yell about how Google copied Apple and the Google device/software that they've never used is a piece of garbage.
Repeat...
Are you honestly going to sit here and lie about which one is selling better?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-28/tech/30082686_1_google-tv-flop-modest-sales
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374595,00.asp
Shame on you.![]()
Pretty much. I doubt many of the people who are on this futile crusade to crush Google have used an Android phone.Step 1: MacRumors posts something about Google/Android
Step 2: A bunch of people who have never used anything but the MacBook Pro and iPhone that their parents bought for them yell about how Google copied Apple and the Google device/software that they've never used is a piece of garbage.
Step 3: Some other people post pictures "proving" that Google directly copied Apple. Aside from a few similarities that you see in every comparison of two technologies, the images look nothing alike.
Step 4: People who have actually used both Apple and Google-powered devices/software post rational comments that are based in reality.
Step 5: A bunch of people who have never used anything but the MacBook Pro and iPhone that their parents bought for them yell about how Google copied Apple and the Google device/software that they've never used is a piece of garbage.
Repeat...
Just going back to the Apple TV, IF they did launch a TV, no doubt at the high end market price bracket, is it going to have glasses free HD 3D from any angle? Or even 3D with glasses? If not then it will already be old technology no matter what interface it has.
It will probably be unlike anything you or I thought it would be. And it would be quite different from Google's or MS' implementations. Apple wouldn't dare put out the sort of crap they do.
Best thing to do is drop all the predictions (they're probably wrong anyway), let go of all your misconceptions, and just sit back and watch Apple do their thing.
It will probably be unlike anything you or I thought it would be. And it would be quite different from Google's or MS' implementations. Apple wouldn't dare put out the sort of crap they do.
Best thing to do is drop all the predictions (they're probably wrong anyway), let go of all your misconceptions, and just sit back and watch Apple do their thing.