The airpods do real-time language conversation conversion?Airpods 2 $159
"$159?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA"
Google Pixel Buds $159
"Cool!"
Cool!
Two very different product for the same price. Yeah, wire, but the AI tech is beyond innovative.
The airpods do real-time language conversation conversion?Airpods 2 $159
"$159?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA"
Google Pixel Buds $159
"Cool!"
The airpods do real-time language conversation conversion?
Cool!
Two very different product for the same price. Yeah, wire, but the AI tech is beyond innovative.
Have a 128gb “just black” on order.
Looking forward to running it alongside my beloved iPhone 7.
I wouldn't blame a company for exclusivity. Look at apple watches. Those are exclusive to Iphones...so same thing.The translation feature in the headphones is amazing, but I feel Google made a huge mistake to make that particular feature exclusive to the Pixel. By doing so, they are undermining their other hardware partners.
Thats why I went for Note 8. Feels right to use regular headphones again.Every Android phone without headphone jack failed to sell. Only Apple can do this, because they leave no other choice.
nice devices but at the price of Samsung's and iPhones, I think they are a little too aggressively priced. Not sure if their strategy is still to have pixel's for developers or just for the masses?
The benefit of Google services as the trade off of your privacy is overrated. I allowed Google Now complete access to my Gmail from day one, all my google searches, my trips in google maps, everything. And the best google can do is telling me where I am with local weather. No ****, I can do that by waking up and looking outside the window. It cannot even show me my plane tickets from Gmail (until I send them to kayak and then google gets the info from the email reminder from Kayak), my events from Gmail, nor properly detect my driving pattern after years of google maps usage (still only thinks I only want to go to wherever Location I searched last, nothing Smart there).Yeah, you're definitely surrendering your privacy (and your family's, and your pet's, etc.) to Google. But how is that any different than the dozens of times every day you surrender your privacy to |Google and other organizations? The difference I see is twofold: on one side you're giving them a whole lot more information; on the flip side, you are getting something valuable in return. Like many things in life, I believe it's a trade-off worth at least considering.
Google is in a very different business compared to Apple. It's still not clear to me that they actually intend to produce and sell as many phones as people would buy. I don't know why - by design, complacency, incompetence?
So you're right that if Apple sold 1 million iPhone 8s that'd be a massive flop, since they made a lot and want to sell a lot.
But if Google just doesn't care about it, or they specifically want to just sell a few - and makes only 1 million Pixels, it's hard to argue it's a flop...
I really love both ecosystems, and the speed of the respective devices. While Samsung has more eye candy, I don’t like the added UI and other “features” they throw into the software.FWIW, if I was going to use an Android device as my primary smartphone, it would likely be something from Google (as of this keynote, it would be a Pixel). Love the idea of the "pure" experience, no crapware, a single source for the device (though that last point still isn't enough to be as effective as Apple, but it's hard to trump hardware + software + store from the same company).
The benefit of Google services as the trade off of your privacy is overrated. I allowed Google Now complete access to my Gmail from day one, all my google searches, my trips in google maps, everything. And the best google can do is telling me where I am with local weather. No ****, I can do that by waking up and looking outside the window. It cannot even show me my plane tickets from Gmail (until I send them to kayak and then google gets the info from the email reminder from Kayak), my events from Gmail, nor properly detect my driving pattern after years of google maps usage (still only thinks I only want to go to wherever Location I searched last, nothing Smart there).
To this day, it still thinks I’m biking whenever I walk around with my moto 360. That shows how competent google’s machine learning or AI or whatever they like to call is. Skip logic I say.
That's one of the ugliest shades of blue I've ever seen, though...At least someone knows blue is a color people want to buy!
What is pretentious about the Watch design?But I think it works on the Pixels, with their toy-ish, casual design. It just looks too big and ugly on the Apple "Watch", with its much more pretentious design. I'm using quotes since it doesn't actually show the time all the time.
The enclosure is made of a special fabric created by Google to let through light and sound.
Yeah, Google may not have invented it from the ground up, but rest assured they will absolutely perfect it.Babelfish!
Well yeah, not as nice, but it’s something!That's one of the ugliest shades of blue I've ever seen, though...
Now THAT'S a nice blue:
![]()
Looks like Google declared WAR on Apple. They see an opening and they're going for it. Can't say I really blame them. I will never understand why Apple didn't buy NEST. The integration between Google Home, Nest, Cast, and all Pixel devices has me giddy.
Next up for Google has to be retail.
pixel 2 xl already ordered
The translation feature in the headphones is amazing, but I feel Google made a huge mistake to make that particular feature exclusive to the Pixel. By doing so, they are undermining their other hardware partners.
Oddly I am buying 2 Android phones this year, and nothing for iOS (for phones, as I picked up an iPad 10.5 I am typing on now). It’s not a statement against apple, Just that I was overdue for my development and main business devices!![]()