Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You sure? The old native app could do this.

Actually, I think the Jasmine app can do background streaming

It seems like any app can play music in the background. I have pasted some info from developer.apple.com for reference.

Yup, audio can be played - that's not a problem. But audio directly from videos (effectively leaving the video playing in the background) wont work. Basically they would need to split the tracks, and provide audio as a separate feed. Whilst this can be done, it would be a bit of a pain in the ass to implement, and always has the odd quirk every now and then, the most common issue is keeping the audio and video in sync when you switch to and from the video feed.
 
I don't understand why the YouTube site still uses Flash to play videos by default! Don't we have better technologies available by now? It's silly how the only way to play video online is to use a 3rd party plugin that isn't available on mobile, so you need a special app…

What? YouTube defaults to Flash on systems that still have it. If you don't have flash—like on almost all mobile devices—the YouTube website works fine in HTML5.
 
I don't understand why the YouTube site still uses Flash to play videos by default! Don't we have better technologies available by now? It's silly how the only way to play video online is to use a 3rd party plugin that isn't available on mobile, so you need a special app…


Try this: http://www.youtube.com/html5

The HTML5 version of youtube is still in beta, but works fine.
 
There was no reason for Apple not to include this in iOS 6. Apple has nothing that competes with this. The only reason I can think off it's that it's a 3rd party app, and Apple doesn't want to ship with 3rd party apps. Would it hurt Apple to ship with the most popular 3rd party apps like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter?

Facebook and twitter are supported in the OS but why should they bundle software that not everyone wants when its simple to download it and configure the phone exactly how you want it. Google own YouTube so are always going to be in a better position to produce the best app for it on any device and can update it when ever they want because its their app and not supplied as part of the OS. I suppose you want your phone to arrive full of crap 3rd party apps and bloatware like you get with many Windows PCs.
 
Been playing around with Gmail on iPhone, YouTube on iPhone and iPad since last night...

Absolutely LOVE it. Great job, Google, especially with Gmail 2.0 - it's fantastic.
 
I would just like to thank you guys. I, like others, am disappointed with the YouTube app in its current form.
Reading this thread pointed me to Jasmine. What a great program it is. Much better IMHO. Thanks.
 
It's probably the same reason they don't ship their computers with all the garbage that comes on a Windows PC - if you really want it, you can go get it.

I woudnt say that YouTube app is a garbage, if you remember. When Ipone criticised because it doesnt have a flash support. Jobs endorsed youtube and sad, youtube has 40% of video on the web, Actually YouTube done lots to iOS, how it become a garbage now?
 
That the app is progressing so quickly in the short time Google has had to make it is astounding. Good work, and frankly, we're lucky they're even releasing it at this point. Comparing it to old established apps isn't really fair, it's not like Google had a head start here and they could've have sat on this until it was 100% finished, but we still wouldn't have native Youtube.

I personally find it adequate. I don't use Youtube however to listen to playlists or watch video on my TV. I just use it to quickly search and watch videos on transit, or the occasional goofing off with friends (doing data center maintenance the other day, I would play Shane McMahon's theme song everytime something went wrong, made the excruciating 17 hours of overtime much more funny).
 
I still can't force videos to HD manually? Am I missing something?

For me I can still only get HD on wifi...even though LTE is faster it goes to SD when I'm on it.
 
There was no reason for Apple not to include this in iOS 6. Apple has nothing that competes with this. The only reason I can think off it's that it's a 3rd party app, and Apple doesn't want to ship with 3rd party apps. Would it hurt Apple to ship with the most popular 3rd party apps like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter?

If Apple shipped this with iOS, you'd have to wait for Apple to push an entire iOS update.
 
Yup, audio can be played - that's not a problem. But audio directly from videos (effectively leaving the video playing in the background) wont work. Basically they would need to split the tracks, and provide audio as a separate feed. Whilst this can be done, it would be a bit of a pain in the ass to implement, and always has the odd quirk every now and then, the most common issue is keeping the audio and video in sync when you switch to and from the video feed.

Jasmine allows you to play in the background. Google should never have released an app that doesn't have this basic feature.
 
Jasmine allows you to play in the background. Google should never have released an app that doesn't have this basic feature.

I'd rather they release the app now with missing functionality then have us wait a year for them to implement what everyone considers "basic". The basic feature is not background playing, it's just watching Youtube videos. The app does that really well.

They can keep adding stuff to it as it progresses, but at least we now have an option to use it while they improve it.
 
How can I view videos with better quality over 3G/4G/LTE? I only get great quality over wifi.
 
WOW! Downloading right now! and Gmail is better also!! OMG! Google is doing their homework! NICE!

----------



they work great. I Own an Android and a iPhone. so, shut up.
\

lol

inb4 he gets all upsad and butthurt because you told him to shut up.


The apps do work great. I actually love how the Youtube app is more like the Android app now since iOS6. I had my doubts when I first heard that it wasn't going to be a built in app, but I actually like it more now.
 
Jasmine allows you to play in the background. Google should never have released an app that doesn't have this basic feature.

Yes it does - I'm not disputing that. That extra functionality isn't exactly a piece of cake to implement though, especially when you've got to make it work with millions of videos that dont actually have separate audio feeds for their videos.

What would you rather they do? Get the app released now, and miss this (very minor) piece of functionality, or make everyone wait another 8 months whilst they convert the entire youtube library to a duel stream system.

----------

because these apps are pretty terrible.

No. They really arent. Stop trolling.
 
Still no 'Remote' option for those who like to control & view YouTube through their TV?

And no HD/SD selection when viewing over 3G.

Disappointing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.