Damn! I bought a cheap Chromebook to replace my mom's 2010 MBP, but I guess I could have just loaded this instead.
You must be kidding, right?
Don't parrot mainstream misconceptions, please.
Security between you and Google is different than between Google and third parties (malicious or not)
This is weird to me. Not anything you said specifically, but it got me thinking... my 2012 Retina MacBook Pro is 10 years old now. (Or close enough.) It's running Monterey and my mom uses it as her main machine without any complaints. It's still perfectly capable of doing everything. (I swapped the wifi card out with one that could do all of the fancy handoff stuff years ago.)A 10y old Mac would likely still run Chrome OS better- or at least just as good as brand new chrome book would today.
Actually ChromeOS is pretty good. I could see my mom using it. Right now she uses Windows 10 and all she uses is a web browser. I think most of older people have only one app they'd use. That is a web browser.ChromeOS is not macOS and not Windows. Apple support its hardware for very long. Instead of using a useless ChromeOS it is better to installa Linux distro which can partially use hardware features.
Kids are a lot smarter than you give them credit for, apparently. It's not like the kids are maintaining the system from the terminal. They're in the GUI, clicking buttons. I'm 100% positive elementary school kids can click buttons in a GUI.Yeah, and I'm sure kids in elementary school can grasp Linux as easy as ChromeOS... /s
Sometimes is not a question of being a good/bad idea. Some people cannot afford to buy a new mac when there are no more upgrades.
The sad part is that Macs can run newer versions of the OS without problems, it is Apple who decides when to make them obsolete.
I agree, it isn't but are there stories of ANYONE running an old version of macOS having any issues what so ever? As long as they're not deliberatly opening dodgy files (which again is still difficult on macOS) I doubt they'd ever see an issue (but again I wouldn't recommend it if you can update of course and i've never run a device old enough to not get software updates so.This. Running an old unsupported OS on a device with Internet isn't a good idea.
Having Support is not bad but often overrated.
It depends of how he uses his device.
If he don't stupidly click on everything that pops up it's totally fine and he'll be safe even >=2030.
You shouldn't.So why would I do this instead of installing Lubuntu?
When following the instructions listed on their site to build a USB installer, you do get to select your hardware, and in this case it tells you to select the Google Flex OS option... There's a dropdown with a long list of devices.This gets more convoluted. Neverware used to list old Chromebooks that Google stopped supporting but would run CloudReady. The site no longer shows any support for Chromebooks. Google must really want its old Chromebooks to be in a landfill.
Yeah, and I'm sure kids in elementary school can grasp Linux as easy as ChromeOS... /s
Well, he can simply install Firefox or any other more recent browser and ditch that WebKit crap. Many ways leads to Rome.That's not true at all. Any number of seemingly-benign websites can be compromised and loaded with webkit exploits that will instantly pwn any non-updated machine. The fact that you're visiting MacRumors is evidence that you visit sites beyond the most secure services from Apple, Google, etc.
People have a misconception that malware is only related to shady and illegal sites, but it can be anywhere--- lets say you want to convert 5 liters to gallons and you click on the first website that shows up in the search results, promising to be an easy measurement conversion calculator. If it's your unlucky day and you're running an old web browser or old OS, congrats on becoming a new spambot or cryptominer.
Outside of web browsing (which constantly brings new remote code to your machine), it's probably safe to use some non-web internet services on an old/nonsupported machine if you're behind NAT.
In all fairness you must commend Apple for the fact that their machines even last that long and, usually, are still in a pretty usable state even a decade later. The fact that you can reasonably expect get 8 to 10 years out of some piece of hardware is by no accounts a bad thing, and something you clearly cannot expect from off-the-shelf PCs, especially low cost no-names. But.No, we should not. And I agree. Why can Google do this and Apple can’t? I think the answer is that Google can monetize on this while Apple has no incentive to support older Macs (since their revenue comes from selling new Macs whereas Googles revenue comes from mining user data.) apple has no incentive to support their older hardware.
Apple needs to up their game. Even the oldest intel macs can still run Windows 10 with a modern browser. That’s the only way to continue using them properly, accessing the internet.
Its an issue. If you buy a Mac you get a few years of macOS but eventually you need to switch to Windows or linux or something once your “trial” ends since OS support is always shorter than the product lifetime should be.
Even financial reasons aside, buying a new machine just because of ending software “support” shouldn’t be a thing. Just consider the environmental aspects. It’s perfectly valid to use, say, a 2008 iMac if you only need the internet and do other light tasks. But now people that use it have to switch to windows/linux and now potentially this Google thing.
I’m a Mac user because of macOS but for people In my family (that often use my old machines when I hand them down), Macs are seen as some weird machines that come with a useless OS and the first thing to do is install windows on them.
Which hurts because they’re still good machines.
I thought ChromeOS already supports Android apps AND Linux apps if you want to? Anything available for Debian Linux should be available for ChromeOS too.I like this idea, I think if it supported Android apps in addition to webapps, this would be a winner for folks who only need a Chrome browser. I wouldn't use it personally, but it could be fun to play with.
Regular ChromeOS does. But it seems like this ChromeOS Flex doesn't.I thought ChromeOS already supports Android apps AND Linux apps if you want to? Anything available for Debian Linux should be available for ChromeOS too.