Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The trick of course will be to make spy glasses ( yup) look like regular glasses. You don't want to draw attention to your spying. No spy wants this.

Nothing worse than AI spy glasses also. These can dig deep. Dig up all the dirt, in realtime! What fun! By the end of a meeting, or whatever, you might even be ready for blackmail, or other extreme intrusions.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 555gallardo
Apple needs to make people recording with those things BLATANTLY CLEAR that recording is in progress. Something more obvious than what Meta has implemented with their stuff. Privacy is in tatters as it is. Please help us out?
There is no expectation of privacy in public.
Ridiculous comments.

Yes people have a camera on them with their smartphones but it’s pretty easy to tell if someone’s recording you. Especially if they’re trying to frame the shot to get what they want.

Spy cameras have terrible quality and if it’s “concealed” you’ll never know if you’re actually recording something worthwhile.

With glasses you can simply look at what you want to record and that’s it. The person won’t know if you’re simply looking in their direction or actually recording them (those security features to tell others you’re recording will get bypassed by some clever $1 trick).

People have the right to be upset at others possibly recording them without their consent.
There is no expectation of privacy in public.
 
I am very much looking forward to Google's implementation of smartglasses with monocular display. I demoed Meta Ray Ban Display and although the wristband gesture command and waveguide screen is truly impressive, the lack of GMaps integration and limited apps limits the overall product.

I currently use the Gen1 Meta Ray Ban smartglasses and love it. I wear prescription glasses anyways so it's nice that with the Meta Ray Bans I can participate in work meeting calls without having to put in earbuds or headphones. I can also take calls discretely without taking out my phone, which frees up my hands. My family went to the local city tree lighting event a few weeks ago and it was nice being able to capture the festivities with the built-in camera and take videos without holding up my phone like everyone else in the crowd. Instead, it was easier to be present in the moment and watch performances with my own eyes while still being able to record short videos to share later with friends and relatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: System603
With glasses you can simply look at what you want to record and that’s it. The person won’t know if you’re simply looking in their direction or actually recording them
Anxiety to the max 🤦‍♂️,..you can already buy lapel cams that are so small you wouldn’t even know u were being recorded. Do you question people holding a phone near you? Back to the bubble 😂
 
I'm surprised that Amazon and Google are both saying smart glasses with displays should be worn while driving for directions.
 
Someone, somewhere is going to make a lot of money from inventing a device you carry on your person that acts as a 'digital shield' so that any unauthorised recording of you from these devices results in a blurred image.
 
There is no expectation of privacy in public.

Repeating this phrase over and over doesn’t mean it’s right, or that it should be this way.

There are still social norms that people abide by, and crossing some lines, no matter how “allowed” it is, still makes it creepy, weird, etc.

Secretly recording someone with your glasses is one of those things that crosses the line for most people.

People who want to do this, and excuse it by saying “well you’re in public, so you have no right to privacy” remind me of the phrase “you’re not wrong, you’re just a jerk.”
 
By the end of a meeting, or whatever, you might even be ready for blackmail, or other extreme intrusions.
images.jpeg


Maybe a little overstated no?
 
Refreshing to see companies taking risks and bringing newness to the market

Not only no, hell no.

Taking photos, talk to an AI to get "information", all the while you will be fed what Google wants to feed you : ads. And Google will collect more data ...

what, you don't trust Google? or Meta?

Edit: adding /s just for clarity
Google Glasses! That is what we have been waiting for! Amazon Alexa glasses are missing only now lol And we can stop hiding everything about us and live happy as everyone will know anyway lol
 
Last edited:
The rectangular slab of our smartphones has been for the last decade and some, the absolute dominant means of communication, creation and consumption for most of humankind.



And nothing lasts forever and I understand that these companies are terrified of missing the next thing.



Don’t forget though that when humans settle on the perfect form, we tend to keep it…books are still a thing 5 centuries on.



Now look both at market success and simply around you, in your homes, streets , offices , rich and poor countries .



People use smartphones.

I also don’t see people clamoring for anything else (if anything, the debate is rather about stale if not outright socially dangerous software rather than hardware (see: social networks) and whether AI is going to change everything or just be another relatively limited tool for us to use…most likely the later when the hype has finally died down).


But maybe the people are wrong.

So let’s see how they react to actual market proposals:

  • AI pendants : a bust
  • VR headsets : at best a niche
  • MR headsets : a niche, if that
  • AR headsets : a tiny niche
  • Foldables : a niche and maybe a limited success. Though you will note that being able to turn a big phone into a fragile small tablet for over 2K USD is hardly paradigm shifting.


I mean, sure, History tells us that someday, something will replace the smartphone.



But I’m pretty it won’t be any of those half baked, fundamentally compromised gadgets.



This is not the future. This is just venture capitalists and tech CEOs burning their ill gotten (*) gains at the altar of their vanities.



(*) exemple : Zuckerberg “earning” billions on scam ads on his social networks and blowing it all on metaverse and AI friends bs.
 
There is no expectation of privacy in public.

There is no expectation of privacy in public.
You must be fun to be around.

How about basic decency and social norms?

Would you (say, with a regular camera) start shooting people in the street without asking them if they are ok with it out of simple courtesy?

Filming stuff in the public interest is one thing (a mugging, police brutality etc) is one thing.

Filming everyone, all the time, without consent or obvious public interest is quite another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shin-Ra
Apple is behind, again!
They may arrive late, but it is also possible that their product is much better. The really important thing is that they solve the important logistical problem of measuring vision defects (in Apple Stores) and manufacturing and installing corrective lenses along with the frame as quickly as possible. That's the key to everything. Buying complete glasses directly and easily. They will sell millions!!!
 
I remember when Motorola and others first introduced earbuds and I got strange looks in public, but once Apple released AirPods they were no longer seen as dorky. I expect the same kind of acceptance with smart glasses. I have stopped worrying about Big Brother and how much of our world is captured by tech companies. I do not like it, but it feels like an uphill battle for us peasants against emerging technologies. 👨‍🔬
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I remember when Motorola and others first introduced earbuds. I used to get strange looks in public, but once Apple released the AirPods, they were no longer seen as dorky. I expect the same kind of public acceptance with smart glasses. Many of the people who are loudly against them now will likely be the first to buy them once Apple releases its own version. 👨‍🔬

Earbuds are one thing but have a camera directly pointed at you, constantly, is a different thing. No it's not the same things as security cameras and everyone having a smartphone camera.

They are just a little too connected for me, camera or not.

There is no expectation of privacy in public.

That's true, but if you have a camera in my face I'm not going to talk to you, and I'm going to let others around me know. I won't be kind about it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rchornef
It'll be hard to have a camera indicator light that cannot be covered up.

Apple's early patents for smart glasses were all LiDAR focused, for environment anchoring; no mention of traditional camera(s). Unfortunately, AI glasses need that, so Apple is forced to add it to theirs.

I could see with Apple's AR glasses, the camera(s) actually pop out somewhere and have a blinking ring light around the lens — can't hide that with a sticker. I could even see Apple adding support for a gesture people can do to tell the recording software to blur their face (retroactive). Might even propose a standard signal glasses can radiate to tell other glasses to blur them (opt-out).
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
I have to wonder what type of eye problems might these glasses cause. Some people might not find out until it’s too late. If phones and computer screens cause eye conditions if used too much over the years I would think glasses would be even worse for our eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.