Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 16GB: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A93 Safari/419.3)

for me, the biggest plus is it's UNIX and comes complete with things such as Apache, PHP, etc. Yes,I know Linux does too but I prefer the UI and the availability of commercial grade Apps on OS X
But what sucks is that with Leopard, you're pretty much stuck with the UI, save from some icon customization, Dock resources, etc. At least with Linux, you can run any GUI you want. It doesn't matter. You can make it look like Windows, Solaris, Mac OS X, anything. That's one huge advantage for Linux, I think.

The only downside is that such GUI customization comes at the expense of integration. Many Linux apps don't integrate well with any old GUI, they are usually only built for either GNOME or KDE.
 
But what sucks is that with Leopard, you're pretty much stuck with the UI, save from some icon customization, Dock resources, etc. At least with Linux, you can run any GUI you want. It doesn't matter. You can make it look like Windows, Solaris, Mac OS X, anything. That's one huge advantage for Linux, I think.

The only downside is that such GUI customization comes at the expense of integration. Many Linux apps don't integrate well with any old GUI, they are usually only built for either GNOME or KDE.

Thats true... in fact I dont want customization to the point linux has where you can completely change the GUI.

I want, customization like what windows XP/Vista has. Where you can download (or make) themes, and easily apply them. thats only thing that Im jealous of when my XP friends show me their computer. I'll like look at my friends fancy black, and shiny white theme on his computer... and think "I wish i could put themes on OS X" oh well, its one simple price to pay for all the other advantages you gain from using OS X.
 
But what sucks is that with Leopard, you're pretty much stuck with the UI, save from some icon customization, Dock resources, etc. At least with Linux, you can run any GUI you want. It doesn't matter. You can make it look like Windows, Solaris, Mac OS X, anything. That's one huge advantage for Linux, I think.

The only downside is that such GUI customization comes at the expense of integration. Many Linux apps don't integrate well with any old GUI, they are usually only built for either GNOME or KDE.

Apple will never open OS X to themes. They don't want users to be able to completely change the look of their products like that.
 
My fave things..

- Spaces and Expose (combined)
Having hot corners for these wows anyone who has not seen it before and makes life stupidly easy. That has switched a few people that see mine in action. Flip 3D in Vista completely misses of the point of the process, as you can't see entire windows in it nor be able to select the one you want without shuffling through ALL of them to get to it. That is terrible implementation right there. Summed up Vista for me really.

- Dragging and Dropping. (I remember in 10.3 when I first tried dragging a document onto the Mail icon and it created a new mail with the document attached. Sounds weird but in that moment I pretty much switched after 12 years working on PC's). I just knew that if there was that level of detail in execution then I was looking a special system. To this day I have tried various dragging and dropping in Windows and it amazes me zero thought has been put into this aspect of interaction

- No registry. This is not a specific OSX thing on the surface, but I love the fact that you can sometimes fix a problem by just removing a plist (no re-install of an app!). I also like the way you can actually look inside an app itself (view Package Contents) and actually see the building blocks. Nothing has ever slowed down for me by adding more apps or anything. In Windows even after uninstalling I never really felt an app was gone until I reformatted. Using something like AppZapper is even better. I think in future that function should be added to OSX when you trash an app, but that is a small niggle.

- Uptime. Enough said here. Our whole business runs on OSX now, and I never have to administer the machines really. This is why IT support needs windows, otherwise there are going to be a lot of bored people! 🙂

- Great Apps (as mentioned before). Really able to find not only commercially available packages, but also fantastic little freeware and shareware apps too and compared to Windows, the quality is much better. Hardly any of them have advertising built-in, and I think developing in OSX means the standard of interface and design of the app is much higher.

- Thought in everything. Sounds weird, but coming from PC's I am used to a pile of garbage on screen when booting up - seeing BIOS information etc. When I switched to Mac I loved the fact that there was nothing but a simple logo and loader, and now when booting up and selecting a different boot drive - not only does it clearly show your drives, but also the custom icon for your drive as well (if it has one). It is that level of thought and detail (even at a bootloader) that makes you appreciate the thought and effort that has gone into every little detail.

I could keep going, but that should do it for now... 🙂
 
The great feature list is so long it's hard to begin (Time Machine, Spaces, QuickView, Finder, etc.)

After just using Windows again for the first time in a while, I feel that the very long list of great features end up merging into my favorite thing about the Mac OS. It is the approachability/usability/simplicity of the software that makes it so great.
 
What got me hooked was the ease of use. Not having to worry so much of Viruses & major exploits like in any version of Windows. Furthermore the out of box experience without having to install any software just by using what comes with OS X. In short I've been more productive & have done so much more with less I may add then I ever did with any version of Windows. Here is my Order of use. switching to MAC was the best thing I ever did from a platform standpoint. I would go crazy without it.

1st. MAC OS X
2nd. Linux Ubuntu
3rd. Windows XP/Vista
 
What got me hooked was the ease of use. Not having to worry so much of Viruses & major exploits like in any version of Windows.

please don't generalized people. I, for one, like to do stuff such as
1. change the depth/radius of the shadow
2. change the opacity
3. change the color of menu bar.
 
please don't generalized people. I, for one, like to do stuff such as
1. change the depth/radius of the shadow
2. change the opacity
3. change the color of menu bar.

those thigns are great, and sure I wont argue is one plus about linux/windows, and a minus for OS X. Apple pretty much won't give us a ton of freedom, they think OS x should be the way they think it's best. Luckily for the most part they make good decisions so this hasn't been a bad thing ( FOR THE MOST PART)

but, yeah i'd love to have more options adn customizability.
 
I couldn't live in Windows without Expose and Spotlight. I am so used in them that if I went crazy one day and was willing to change platform, I wouldn't just because of these reasons alone.
 
I couldn't live in Windows without Expose and Spotlight. I am so used in them that if I went crazy one day and was willing to change platform, I wouldn't just because of these reasons alone.

expose
http://www.oxygen-inc.com/premium/InsaniSoft/iEx.htm

spotlight
screenshot_startMenu_Search.jpg

vista default, you can call it with one key (two for spotlight in osx)
 
expose
http://www.oxygen-inc.com/premium/InsaniSoft/iEx.htm

spotlight
screenshot_startMenu_Search.jpg

vista default, you can call it with one key (two for spotlight in osx)

2 things... im not against you, nor am I on your side. I just got some things I'd like to say.

IEX, yeah seems like a pretty good version of Expose for windows, so thats if you do happen to use windows, you CAN have expose, except... well IEX isn't as fast (from what ive heard theres about a second lag) whereas expose in OS X is lightning fast. So i guess if you wanna settle for second best use windows nd get IEX... but quite honestly judging by the fact this forum is full of mac users, I can easily assume most of these members ALL want the best, all the time. (not to be stereotypical or anything *shrugs*)

Windows search, yeah ok thats great.. I havnt used it myself so i can't say anything about how quick it works... but I can assume it's as fast as spotlight or else microsoft would have to be pretty dumb.

You one key for windows search, and 2 keys for OS X point is rubbish IMO. Sure, one key is technically faster, but OS X uses two keys that are extremely close to each other and you can't miss them. (Command + Space bar) theres no way you can mess that key combo up.
 
Quicksilver - just being able to open apps that quickly is priceless.

Expose & Spaces - again, speed improves my workflow greatly

Adium - It's not part of Mac OS X, but exclusive to it, and it's the best IM client ever. Which leads me to the next point.

Apps from the interwebs - There's just so many talented and devoted developers out there, building stuff like Coda or Schoolhouse, all those incredibly helpful and OS X-like applications...

Dock - so convenient, so thought-through.
 
IEX, yeah seems like a pretty good version of Expose for windows, so thats if you do happen to use windows, you CAN have expose, except... well IEX isn't as fast (from what ive heard theres about a second lag) whereas expose in OS X is lightning fast. So i guess if you wanna settle for second best use windows nd get IEX... but quite honestly judging by the fact this forum is full of mac users, I can easily assume most of these members ALL want the best, all the time. (not to be stereotypical or anything *shrugs*)

Windows search, yeah ok thats great.. I havnt used it myself so i can't say anything about how quick it works... but I can assume it's as fast as spotlight or else microsoft would have to be pretty dumb.

You one key for windows search, and 2 keys for OS X point is rubbish IMO. Sure, one key is technically faster, but OS X uses two keys that are extremely close to each other and you can't miss them. (Command + Space bar) theres no way you can mess that key combo up.
of course, I hold no grudge against whoever comment with substance. 🙂 you don't need to be on my side, we just all try to be on the side of fact and common sense.

IEX, is only one of the options, searching "expose+windows" indicate more than once options. I just picked the top search.

Im not a big fan of expose. I didn't use it on OSX, very rarely on linux, and never on windows.

windows search, I used it, It is fast, and it is pretty comprehensive, searching files and apps and etc.

I didn't say somebody will miss the spotlight keyboard combo, I merely put out the fact that windows search is activated by press one key, and spotlight needs two keys.

No matter how close those two keys are. Its two keys, and it takes two fingers/hands to activate. I don't state that everybody will find it "slightly" more complicated than one key in windows. But im sure more people will find one key activation is more convenient.
 
unsanity.com
they have mac os x themes.

*shudders*

for starters shapeshifter doesn't work on leopard... and people using shapeshifter and upgraded to leopard had one heck of a time gettnig a work system again.

I've also heard OTHER horror stories of any unsanity products. In short i've learned to never trust unsanity.
 
No matter how close those two keys are. Its two keys, and it takes two fingers/hands to activate. I don't state that everybody will find it "slightly" more complicated than one key in windows. But im sure more people will find one key activation is more convenient.

But that's also reserving a whole key for a single function when it could be doing many other useful things, too. It's arguable that OS X makes the small sacrifice of having a two-key combo for Spotlight in order to have the command key be much, much more functional and useful than the Windows key on a PC. Some people may not prefer it that way, but I like OS X's choice, which is why I use it.
 
But that's also reserving a whole key for a single function

that key is "super" or "windows" key on a pc keyboard. hardly any sacrifice was involved.

Not to mention, even with one more combo key in OSX. many people still find OSX's shortcuts are more complicated than windows' because of the necessity of pressing more keys in OSX to do the same work that can be accomplished with less keys in windows.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/435075/
 
that key is "super" or "windows" key on a pc keyboard. hardly any sacrifice was involved.

Not to mention, even with one more combo key in OSX. many people still find OSX's shortcuts are more complicated than windows' because of the necessity of pressing more keys in OSX to do the same work that can be accomplished with less keys in windows.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/435075/

I know it's the "Windows" key. But how much can that "Windows" key really do? Much less than the Command key on a Mac. I never used my Windows key on my Dell because I found it pretty much useless.

Good of you for finding that thread. Now go through it and read my posts in it. (The last one is particularly good.)

And I'm not saying one choice is necessarily better than the other. I'm saying I find Apple's choices more logical and ultimately much more functional. I may have to press one more key, but often I can do more things with those keys than I can in Windows, and those other things may be much simpler than in Windows.
 
I know it's the "Windows" key. But how much can that "Windows" key really do? Much less than the Command key on a Mac. I never used my Windows key on my Dell because I found it pretty much useless.

Good of you for finding that thread. Now go through it and read my posts in it. (The last one is particularly good.)

well, you can speculate how much better if that windows key was used for something else. lol. and that would be a topic involving more stuff than we are talking about in THIS discussion.

On this VERY issue, vista uses one key, and thats it.

no, I knew that threat because I contributed some, I didn't go through the forum to find it.
 
haven't finished reading other posts

but yes expose is awesome.
bottom left dashboard
bottom right desktop
top right all windows
yes going on windows in a pain.
another one is the dual external screens on the mbp.
i mean its amazing with spaces also
you never run out of desktop real-estate
i bet some don't know about this

go to
where it says what application it is and click services

and go to summarize.

omg its agg. just highlight and drag over and make it smaller and you get a summarization of it. imagine the algorithms written for that

and another which i just used 5 times. the spell check in any thing you write
 
But what sucks is that with Leopard, you're pretty much stuck with the UI, save from some icon customization, Dock resources, etc. At least with Linux, you can run any GUI you want.
To be frank here though, the Mac OS GUI is so far ahead in terms of design and usability from any Linux GUI, why would you want to run any available GUIs on Linux? I spend the extra money on Macs to get the GUI, without it there isn't much of a reason to use Mac OS X over other UNIX clones.
 
I can go all day on what I love about OS X but the newest feature of Mac OS X is Coverflow. I admit I never used it in iTunes because I just didn't see much use for it but file browsing in Coverflow is great especially since I can increase the size of the icons to VERY LARGE, it makes file browsing very easy and fun to use.

Stacks was the big answer to the Windows Start Button for me. As usual Apple takes it several steps higher. One click and I got access to all my apps and the downloads Stack is supreme!

Some may have different opinions about the Dock but I love the new 3D Dock. It looks very futuristic and makes the Mac experience more of a joy. 😀

The biggest feature I like about Mac OS X is that it is equipped to do EVERYTHING! I can run all my Apple apps and I can install Windows if needed so with OS X I can have my cake and eat it too.🙂
 
I know it's the "Windows" key. But how much can that "Windows" key really do? Much less than the Command key on a Mac. I never used my Windows key on my Dell because I found it pretty much useless.

Good of you for finding that thread. Now go through it and read my posts in it. (The last one is particularly good.)

And I'm not saying one choice is necessarily better than the other. I'm saying I find Apple's choices more logical and ultimately much more functional. I may have to press one more key, but often I can do more things with those keys than I can in Windows, and those other things may be much simpler than in Windows.
I agree completely... apple made their command key MUCH more useful. IDK why people say OS X key commands are difficult. Whenever you use OS X key commands, all you gotta do is remember 1 thing and that thing is

"THE COMMAND KEY IS THE GOD OF KEY COMMANDS" it's simple, all i do is hold down the command key.

now while holding command key, lets see here I want to close an app
I press Q
I want to switch between apps
I press Tab
I want to copy
I press C
I cant to cut
I press X
I want to paste
I press V
I want application preferences
I press ,
I want a new window
I press N
I want to save
I press S
on and on, there is even more key commands then that, but i just covered the basics

have i made my point clear? ALL the basic key commands revolve around the command key, which makes it simple, because I just gotta remember, the other letters like, C, X, V, N, S, Q, Tab etc.

Maybe Windows has an easier, way but i dont care I find OS X is easy enough.
and another which i just used 5 times. the spell check in any thing you write
Oh yah i completely forgot about the spell check in OS X. I mean I use it all the time, but idk how I forgot to mention it. The spell check is VERY handy, and although it's not perfect it's still pretty good, plus whenever there's a word im unsure of, I just right-click that word, and as long as I was anywhere close to the right spelling, OS X will give me the right spelling. I cant believe I forgot to mention such a wonderful feature. Leopard also has grammar check, but that doesn't exactly work wonderfully, I mean sure it catches my really OBVIOUS mistakes, but it wont catch every grammar mistake.

One more thing, I just thought of. Does anyone else use the built-in dictionary alot? I dont mean I just read random big words. I mean, whenever Im on the internet (or well ANYWHERE) and lets say I run into a big word. Instead of me being a noob and asking the person "what does that word mean" I simple right-click it and choose look-up in dictionary. 5 seconds later I've got the definition to the word. I then press command-Q and the dictionary goes away, and I move on now knowing what that word means. VERY fast, and VERY handy.
 
One of the principle advantages that the Mac OS has had over other operating systems, a feature that is frequently taken for granted, is the way Apple has chosen to bundle applications with the icon. In OS X, and previous Apple operating systems as well as a few other OS's such as AmigaDOS, applications in the GUI represent the actual application in the file system and not an obscure pointer to it. This has several advantages over the alternative of having shortcuts pointing to files located elsewhere.

First, installing and uninstalling an application is just a matter of drag and drop. Most developers are kind enough to include an installer, but the reality is that you can just drag and drop applications to wherever you want them to be. This was best exemplified by the installation procedure for MS Office X.

Secondly, because of this, you can easily move and execute an application to another location. In contrast, in an OS like Windows where the application relies in one directory and the support files are arbitrarily deposited in other directories, moving the application can not only break the application but also the OS.

Third, because of the way applications are bundled with their icons the OS doesn't become littered with obscurely labeled .dll files or their equivalents. Even a good uninstaller in Windows, for instance, will prompt the user for permission to delete associated .dll files that are confusingly named and could, potentially, lead to destabilizing the OS.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.