Setting standards is a reasonable function of government, even if I disagree with the standard or rational.
.
Except the Swiss were the last to give women the right to vote. Hardly letting all people make "their own choices and doing their own thinking without being told what to choose and think..."
Godwin's law.
The question is "What is the least amount?" In this case, the EU adopted a standard developed by industry, not one developed by some EU technocrat. Even the regulation is very minimal, as companies are free to develop their own implementations beyond the plug and basic PD. Apple could develop a MiFi equivalent for its cable if it chooses to do so.
Nothing in the spec mandates USB-C as the only choice. Apple, or any other manufacturer, could go to wireless only charging and keep Lightening or other non-USB-C plug for data only. Not that that will happen, for technical reasons at least.
Really? USB-C is the moral equivalent of the Inquisition?
That argument really jumped the shark.
I didn't expect a kind of Spanish Inquisition arguement, but then I bet nobody expected the Spanish Inquisition!
No one is forcing Europeans to only use USB-C power cords. They are free to buy a non-USB-C device outside of the EU and use it in the EU, as is anyone who travels to the EU.
This is hardly an abuse of power.
Is the USB-C connector the right one to standardize on? There are valid points on both sides. Given that was the direction the major players were moving to anyway, defining a minimal set of requirements at least ensures some level of compatibility; even if it doesn't mean one cable will rule them all.