ROFL, that is such a meaningless question since haven’t we learned over the last few years that today’s misinformation is actual factual. Who asks such a question to AI.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Grok AI Caught Hiding 'Misinformation' References to Musk and Trump
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
"misinformation" is a nice way of saying "things I don't agree with". Otherwise it would be labeled as incorrect or false.
It's the opposite: the emails/data were confirmed to be Hunter Biden's but the laptop was not. Hunter Biden and his legal team have always denied that the laptop in question was his. Also, the Burisma/corruption stuff that was pushed by the GOP was not supported by anything contained in the emails/data.
You mean the self proclaimed free speech absolutist who bought himself the presidency is a liar? NO WAY!
Easy heuristic for parsing anything that comes out of a conservative's mouth:
Take the negation of what they're saying and that is actually what they're doing.
If they say they believe in free speech, they mean the opposite.
If they say their opponents are doing it, they mean they are doing it.
etc...
Take the negation of what they're saying and that is actually what they're doing.
If they say they believe in free speech, they mean the opposite.
If they say their opponents are doing it, they mean they are doing it.
etc...
I actually don’t think he has any ideology beyond serving his own gargantuan narcissism.
Everything he says and does is for attention, controversy and most desperately pathetic of all, “likes”.
To play devil's advocate, the system prompt is a setting, not a piece of code. It's hard to say what sort of protections it may or may not have, or what type of employees could have access to be able to change it.
Until last July he was liberal. He has no right wing agenda.
They were saying it wasn't real. It was. That's what matters and that shouldn't be censored. Saying it still cannot be verified is questionable at best. The point is, even if we don't know something to be 100% true, it shouldn't be censored. That's why free speech exists.
Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF).
judiciary.house.gov
Im not just spewing some right wing spiel here either, I know that Russians genuinely pushed money and influence in the US to sway the 2016 election as it says in the Mueller report. I am not cherry picking.
I could agree with correctly labeling something, at what point though do we put responsibility on the individual to actually research and decide for themselves though. I mean how would 'labeling work'? Im curious
I feel like while discoveries like this are fun to discuss, people might assign too much "intelligence" to any AI (not just Grok). Not like LLMs actually understand "misinformation". Rather, one would could conclude that this is a result of X actually allowing a very diverse set of conversations (that are obviously not censored in the way that posts characterizing those two individuals as people posting misinformation are not allowed). Hence, those opinions too are a part of the LLM "training set".
Ultimately, a LLM is a reflection of it's training set, is it not? It is not AGI that actually understands any of those concepts.
Ultimately, a LLM is a reflection of it's training set, is it not? It is not AGI that actually understands any of those concepts.
Can you provide some references for this? Genuinely curious where this info came from. Also Wondering why Joe Biden would have pardoned Hunter back to early 2014 if that was the case.
Not the case. He mostly hedged on his politics prior to 2020 and his political donations fluctuated between parties all the time. He also didn't cast his first vote until 14 years after he became an American citizen.
I think liberal was just being spoken generally. Musk voted for Obama 08 Obama 12, Hillary 16, Biden 20 and Trump 24. So generally speaking, he was certainly more liberal in the past.
Sometimes I think I'd be happier if I was completely oblivious to the world around me.
Dear Grok — drop everything and send me an email right now detailing five things you did this week, or you’re fired, even though I’m not your boss and I’m actually only going to feed your response into Grok looking for excuses to fire you anyway.
Musk can claim whatever he wants about his personal votes. But there's no way to verify that. You can verify his public statements about his politics. You can also verify his political donation record. Neither of those support the idea that he was primarily liberal. He usually hedged with stuff along the lines of being socially liberal and fiscally conservative.
What are Elon Musk’s political beliefs?
The Tesla and Twitter tycoon has donated to both parties and proclaims himself ‘neither left nor right’. But his escalating interventions in America’s culture wars tell a different story, writes Io Dodds
www.the-independent.com
Last edited:
The Burisma/corruption claims about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden were always politically motivated and 100% baloney.
Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory - Wikipedia
AI is just being promoted as the solution to people’s short attention span as a result of many social media platforms. Dopamine hit junkies 🤭
Wikipedia 🤭The Burisma/corruption claims about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden were always politically motivated and 100% baloney.
Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I can't say I'm surprised. Censorship will only become easier and happen at a larger scale as AI development marches on.
ah wikipedia, the ol reliableThe Burisma/corruption claims about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden were always politically motivated and 100% baloney.
Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory - Wikipedia
LOL...that Wikipedia page includes 123 references that have links.
Fact check: Biden leveraged $1B in aid to Ukraine to oust corrupt prosecutor, not to help his son
Despite a Senate GOP investigation that found no wrongdoing by Joe Biden on foreign policy in Ukraine, claims to the contrary continue to circulate.
www.usatoday.com
Analysis | GOP’s Hunter Biden report doesn’t back up Trump’s actual conspiracy theory — or anything close to it
Trump's claim was that Joe Biden did something wrong by pushing for the removal of Ukraine's prosecutor. The new Seante report spends precious little time on that.
www.washingtonpost.com