Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You really can’t. The floating widgets remain. The highlighted borders remain. The added visual noise in general remains. Reduce Transparency also reduces contrast in many instances. In addition, it has display bugs in various places. You have to deal with a mess of a UI either way.
full

At least they fixed the horrible banding issue with the latest update. However now there's a new bug where if you move the widget too many times it not only crashes the widget but the entire OS taking you back to the lock screen.
 
You really can’t. The floating widgets remain. The highlighted borders remain. The added visual noise in general remains. Actions taking more taps than previously remains as well. Reduce Transparency also reduces contrast in many instances. In addition, it has display bugs in various places. You have to deal with a mess of a UI either way.
🤷‍♂️

I like it. And I would never let the little changes you mention bother me much even if I didn't like them, but I get it. Everyone is different and sometimes stuff like that matters.

But my ultimate point remains, Apple will almost certain continue to refine the experience somehow, probably with more options if nothing else.
 
But my ultimate point remains, Apple will almost certain continue to refine the experience somehow, probably with more options if nothing else.
I’m sure they will try to improve things, but for the time being it’s a regression in usability for many, and thus a consideration not to buy a new iPhone right now, and maybe for some time to come.
 
"Despite switch to aluminum body and introduction of vapor chamber sustained performance hasn't improved." OUCH.

Don't quite follow the reviewers statement there.

https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/iphone-17-pro-benchmarks-a19-pro

The iPhone 17 Pro Max — the top-device in Apple's new lineup — turns in respective single and multicore results of 3,871 and 9,968. That's a 14% improvement over the iPhone 16 Pro Max's single-core result on Geekbench, while the multicore score went up by a more impressive 20%.
 
I mean... Many of the people I know who purchased the 17 Pro/Max are talking about how frequently and noticeably warm it gets in typical usage. So I'm sure the truth is somewhere in the middle.

Haven't seen any reports on that yet. Not saying that it's not happening, but just haven't read them yet. Still waiting to get my hands on the 17 Pro in a few weeks. I guess I will see then if it is overheating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive and ypl
That's a review?

LOL. I guess that's what counts as a review these days.

I will give somebody a cookie if they can spot the irony of this little doozy found in the article.

The iPhone 17 Pro, despite its power and battery life, is a very flawed phone. There’s a reason that the base model of the iPhone 17 is selling so well: it’s a tried and tested design with solid hardware backing it up. More of that, please. I love overhauling smartphones, but do spend a little more time testing them, won’t you?
 
Yet another review that proves my argument:
1. Camera barely differs from 16 Pro or 15 Pro
2. 4x telephoto takes “basic” images
3. Still lots of processing applied to every shot, lots of HDR artifacts (like objects, buildings, even people having “glow” around them, artificially lifted shadows here and there, noise processing on the level of “Chat GPT, please generate beautiful landscape for me”)
 
  • Like
Reactions: C. Robert
It’s been 5 years since Apple stopped including a charger. Weird to add it as a con at this point.
It is an anti-consumer practice and I believe EU should step in and demand them to put it there. Imagine if laptop manufacturers do that because all new laptops charge with USB-C.

Apple did this with argumentation that “chargers are unneeded e-waste”. In my life I had never thrown away any charging brick, I have all of them, and all of them find use in my house.

Sure competitors also do that, but I still want them to put at least some sort of charger in the box
 
It’s hilarious, and honestly pathetic, how some people bend over backwards to defend Apple’s blunders, like the company needs their free PR department. Newsflash: Apple isn’t going to thank you for lowering the bar. Every time flaws get brushed off with blind loyalty, the products get worse, innovation stalls, and we’re all left paying more for less. Keep cheerleading mediocrity if you want, but don’t pretend you’re helping Apple grow.
 
No, just a long rambling about what is now the very fashionable opinion that the new iPhone 17 Pro is easily scratched and thus pure junk. 🙄

You at least have to give the 'professional' reviewers credit. They have so seamlessly pivoted from the "iPhone 17 Pro is the least substantial upgrade in the iPhone history..." to "Oh my god they changed everything and it's all for not and the iPhone Pro is ruined..."

I mean this was a seamless transition. Nice job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macintosh IIcx
Cons for almost every "news" outlet make me scratch my head:

Controversial Design - it's subjective so not really a con.
Telephoto - is the lens good? If it is then great, but just because it wasn’t the upgrade you wanted doesn't make it a con.
iOS 26 - that's a software review, this is hardware.
Charger - so not only did they want a charger but the NEW one...bruh it's been years, get over it.

Heck, from 16 series I still see reviews listing no headphone jack as a con. People are wild these days.
Every single one of those “cons” is valid, because a con isn’t about what you personally care about, it’s about what the product fails to deliver compared to expectations, competition, or past features. Design is a con if it turns people off, telephoto is a con if users wanted more reach, iOS matters because hardware and software are inseparable, and the charger is a con because Apple created that pain point in the first place, and it is not available everywhere.
 
It’s hilarious, and honestly pathetic, how some people bend over backwards to defend Apple’s blunders, like the company needs their free PR department. Newsflash: Apple isn’t going to thank you for lowering the bar. Every time flaws get brushed off with blind loyalty, the products get worse, innovation stalls, and we’re all left paying more for less. Keep cheerleading mediocrity if you want, but don’t pretend you’re helping Apple grow.
The hilarious part is how much hate Apple gets for minor things or things that others do, or things that are simply personal preference. This board has been absolutely wild with toxicity for a month or so now. Apparently it's that way this time every year.
 
It’s hilarious, and honestly pathetic, how some people bend over backwards to defend Apple’s blunders, like the company needs their free PR department. Newsflash: Apple isn’t going to thank you for lowering the bar. Every time flaws get brushed off with blind loyalty, the products get worse, innovation stalls, and we’re all left paying more for less. Keep cheerleading mediocrity if you want, but don’t pretend you’re helping Apple grow.

You know what I find hilarious is the people who criticize Apple endlessly no matter what they do. They are quick to write their endless dribble about how Apple has failed the consumer, and then oddly their website is down for the month that Apple does something good.

I have no problem criticizing Apple, but there is almost no balance left. It's all negative all the time. The abuse that Tim Cook gets, on this very site - a Mac fan site no less, tells you all you need to know. According to that crowd Cook has never done a single thing right. Ever. He just constantly fails.

That's pathetic.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.