Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here's a screen shot of the Disk Speed Test (Blackmagic) obtained from my Intel 335 SSD, MBP late 2011, TRIM enabled

thanks! any possible way you can take a selective screen shot of just the app without any background so that I dont have to Photoshop/crop out the background?

----------

I just finished installing the SanDisk Extreme on my MacBook Pro. The process is a little bit longer than I expected, because I stripped a couple of screws (I am not really good working with hardware, especially computers). Once completed, I fresh installed the system and used Migration Assistant to copy my data over. The speed test result is in the attachment below.
The benchmark result is a little bit underwhelming, probably because the BlackMagic tool uses incompressible data while the SandForce controller likes compressible data. The real world difference however is HUGE. The system now boots up in 10 seconds, much, much better than the 5400rpm hard drive. Apps like iMovie used to take like 5 bounces to start up, now it starts in 1 bounce. I got the SSD for a great deal at $80. It is a great upgrade to any system.


thanks! any possible way you can take a selective screen shot of just the app without any background so that I dont have to Photoshop/crop out the background?

is this a "pro"?
 
thanks! any possible way you can take a selective screen shot of just the app without any background so that I dont have to Photoshop/crop out the background?

Will this do? Eliminating the background means cutting off the sides of the speed dials ....
 

Attachments

  • Intel 335SSD Disk Speed Test.jpg
    Intel 335SSD Disk Speed Test.jpg
    212.1 KB · Views: 116
I have a MBP 8,2 with Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256Gb... Trim enabled, negociated link 6G... but Blackmagic write tests are slow... anyone knows why?

Screen Shot 2013-02-06 at 10.15.51 PM.png
 
Sandforce drives are using compressible data to get the best possible results in benchmarks, those are the numbers they advertise when they say 'up to 500mb/s'. Real-world performance will vary.

Image

Ok, I think this explains everything, Incompressible data is not that easy on a SF controller, thanks!
 
Here's my 128GB rMBP SSD (in USB 3.0 enclosure)

pYe2LCT.jpg


And the 256GB drive from 15" rMBP I upgraded to:

hTcFKSk.jpg
 
240GB SanDisk Extreme II SSD (SDSSDXP-240G-G25)

Just upgraded my MacBook Pro 15-inch Mid 2012 with a 240GB SanDisk Extreme II SSD (http://www.sandisk.co.uk/products/ssd/sata/extreme-ii/?capacity=240GB), advertised speeds are 550MB/s read and 510MB/s write.

Very pleased with the results, a substantial upgrade from the 500GB 5400rpm disk that's now lying in an external disk caddy ;)
 

Attachments

  • DiskSpeedTest.png
    DiskSpeedTest.png
    737.8 KB · Views: 120
Very pleased with the results, a substantial upgrade from the 500GB 5400rpm disk

Congratulations, you ought to be very pleased with the difference over a slow HDD. Now you'll never want to use a HDD again as a boot drive.
 
Here's a look at the 960 GB Crucial M500 installed in a late 2011 MBP 15. It's running the shipping firmware as Crucial has not released any updates yet.



I've had the drive installed for a couple months now (purchased it the first day it was available) and it's a great performer. This is the highest capacity SSD you can buy for the lowest price.
 
here are my results for Kingston v300 120G

It seems I have the worst result out of all others previously posted :(
what can be wrong ?

DiskSpeedTestT.png


I just upgraded to Mavericks
- Mac Book Pro 15 (mid 2010)
- i7 2800
- 8 Gb memory
and this Kingston v300 120G

yes I had worse results with standard HDD, but I expected more from this upgrade... something closer to other results posted here.

Thanks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.