Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why does Apple need to target this group?

Is targeting this group profitable for Apple? Is targeting this group require additional resources to maintain, develop new processors, frameworks? Are these requirements adaptable to other segments in the market?

What is the growth predictions for this segment? Is this going to be sustainable for the next 5-15 years to invest resources here?
The Mac Pro does target a group of high end users who are willing to spend an unreasonable amount of money for a computer. Even with the extra R&D it is likely that Apple would make money on a new Mac Pro, though the volume would not be high and the profits not large in absolute terms.

The biggest benefits for Apple of having a computer in that category are about forcing themselves to stretch themselves technically and about presenting an image of themselves as being a high end producer of aspirational products. The Mac Pro requires Apple to explore and solve some significant technical problems. Often those solutions can end up being applied to the lower end of the line down the road. Having an expensive but powerful top line product reinforces the image of Apple as a technical leader. Customers don't necessarily expect to buy one but they can dream of doing so and then will buy one of the less expensive models. This halo affect is common in car product lines, too. It's why VW bought Bugatti and why lots of companies have super expensive, low volume top line products that make their other products look more appealing.
 
The Mac Pro does target a group of high end users who are willing to spend an unreasonable amount of money for a computer.
No. The Mac pro targets professionals who need computational power to perform their tasks faster to generate more revenue for their businesses.
about presenting an image of themselves as being a high end producer of aspirational products.
Companies care about their image and what they stand for in terms of revenue, benefits for investors and social governance. Image in the minds of people groups is not why companies enter segments or spend their precious R&D budget. Apple is a for-=profit company. If it makes business sense, they will target and enter any segment.

Having an expensive but powerful top line product reinforces the image of Apple as a technical leader.
Correct in the marketing terms and how this can be persuaded in consumer behaviors. In this case though, R&D costs might have been more costly than the halo effect it generates and Apple leadership opting out of certain functions of the Mac Pro.

Also, "being a technical leader impacting sales" is getting less and less relevant today, as consumer behaviours are shifting.
 
Agreed, Apple does not need to target a small group of users that need 1.5TB ram. I am sure there are other unix boxes for that .... but maybe there will be a way of adding a Virtual memory nvme drive ... not as fast as ram, but fast enough ? just an idea...
 
  • Like
Reactions: sam_dean
Why does Apple need to target this group?

Is targeting this group profitable for Apple? Is targeting this group require additional resources to maintain, develop new processors, frameworks? Are these requirements adaptable to other segments in the market?

What is the growth predictions for this segment? Is this going to be sustainable for the next 5-15 years to invest resources here?
It's where the highest profit is. There are far more users of these machines than there are video editors.
 
It's where the highest profit is. There are far more users of these machines than there are video editors.
That's hearsay - we do not knwo the financial information referring this segment is most profitable. If the R&D cost far outweighs the gross margin and overhead costs Apple would be wise not to invest in this segment, especially during this
 
That's hearsay - we do not knwo the financial information referring this segment is most profitable. If the R&D cost far outweighs the gross margin and overhead costs Apple would be wise not to invest in this segment, especially during this
So you're saying this could be an extremely profitable business?

I agree.
 
Now you are moving to "could be" whereas you were so certain about the "extreme profitability" before.

Yes could be, but most likely not considering the sales volumes vs development costs and scalability.
Yes I also agree that it could definitely be a large and profitable market.

Not likely. What we have from Apple is that the Mac Pro’s revenue makes up less than 1% of Apple’s revenue. Profitable, sure, extremely, no.
Yes I agree the video market isn't worth targeting over engineering workstation market.
 
es I agree the video market isn't worth targeting over engineering workstation market.
On the contrary, Apple makes one of the leading video editing software packages. For Apple, that’s a far more valuable target than anything other than maybe music production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botts85
M1 Max to M1 Ultra doubles the price of the Mac Studio to $4k. So a M2 Extreme that doubles a M2 Ultra SoC would make it a $8k Mac Studio.

How big of a market is a $8k Mac Studio or $10k Mac Pro with an M2 Extreme SoC?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.