Well obviously the HomePod would not get it because apple put a mediocre chip in it hopefully we get a new HomePod by October
The apple way. Box off features to try and force upgrades (while just leaving products that are plenty capable behind). At least Google and Microsoft are putting AI in everything. This wouldn't be such a big deal if Siri wasn't a total dumpster fire.Lost in all this AI nonsense is how the horrendous Siri experience is apparently just going to continue on for all the devices (the vast majority) that don't support the "future" that Apple is pivoting to
I use my homepods (stereo pair) with an Apple TV as my TV audio. I never use Siri (because it is ass) so as a speaker (and especially as a pair) they work really well. Now with that being said, would I buy another homepod? Absolutely not, since apple seems to be treating them like the red-headed step child of their product lines.I’m not sure I understood the appeal of HomePod. Sure the audio is good but the control interface is/was a known (bad) quantity. People had hopes, and still do, that it will somehow improve with time but the old adage of buy it for what it does now and not the possibility of future enhancements has yet to be proven wrong. Here’s more proof it’s a dud. And it’s foolish thinking a watch chip will ever be able to even do off device processing. It’s just not gonna happen. At this point I honestly don’t know what to say if someone is still all in on HomePods or even considers buying whatever comes next in that product line. But some folks have to touch the stove multiple times to learn it’s gonna burn them.
I don’t think it’s just a CPU it’s a ram limitation, an updated Apple TV could probably also do the job in theory. Everything that already exists that is going to get Apple Intelligence has at least 8gb of ram, if this is a limiting factor where probably going to need a new class of device whether that’s HomePod or Apple TV, which has the required ram and an updated chip, but it’s not likely to be a straight swap, but it would be a premium version.Why not get Apple TV with A18 to do the processing?
Well, unless they are going to produce a version of the A16 with 8Gb RAM I think Apple are probably just going to have to update everything with A18. If the HomePod isn't designed to have A series CPU in it then there's going to be a lot of 'Ultra' models or they'll ask buyers to add something inexpensive (eg iPhone or AppleTV) to their ecosystem to do the heavy lifting.I don’t think it’s just a CPU it’s a ram limitation, an updated Apple TV could probably also do the job in theory. Everything that already exists that is going to get Apple Intelligence has at least 8gb of ram, if this is a limiting factor where probably going to need a new class of device whether that’s HomePod or Apple TV, which has the required ram and an updated chip, but it’s not likely to be a straight swap, but it would be a premium version.
We already have instances of devices handed off Siri requests, eg the ecobee that still requires at least a HomePod for its integration to function
Like Microsoft putting Copilot+ on systems with non-Qualcomm chips?At least Google and Microsoft are putting AI in everything
The HomePod does not store your messages, contacts, and mail or any other personal data. Presumably, it cannot run the local models of the personalized index that is at the heart of Apple Intelligence, right?
So Apple’s monetizing play here will most likely be taking a cut of other AI provider’s revenue streams and then calling that an Apple service. Kinda gross. Just like Apple treating its cut of every micro-transaction in an iOS game as a service.There’s an opportunity to turn AI features and other software into paid services, but it will take time. Though Apple Intelligence will be free to start, the long-term plan is to make money off the capabilities. The company could eventually launch something like “Apple Intelligence+” — with extra features that users pay monthly fees for, just like iCloud. On top of that, Apple will get a cut of the subscription revenue from every AI partner that it brings onboard.
Isn’t it eventually coming to Intel and AMD non-x86 machines?Like Microsoft putting Copilot+ on systems with non-Qualcomm chips?
Maybe a HomePod with Apple Intelligence won’t need the full 8gb RAM. Maybe 4/6 because less RAM is needed as it’s not running a full operating system.I don’t think it’s just a CPU it’s a ram limitation, an updated Apple TV could probably also do the job in theory. Everything that already exists that is going to get Apple Intelligence has at least 8gb of ram, if this is a limiting factor where probably going to need a new class of device whether that’s HomePod or Apple TV, which has the required ram and an updated chip, but it’s not likely to be a straight swap, but it would be a premium version.
We already have instances of devices handed off Siri requests, eg the ecobee that still requires at least a HomePod for its integration to function
I don’t see that changing with "an entirely new robotic device with a display that includes Apple Intelligence at its core."The current HomePod is said to be "too low-volume a product to waste the engineering time" bringing Apple Intelligence to the device.
As he discussed in his article Apple trying to use Apple Intelligence as a carrot to get consumers to buy new iPhones will be an interesting predicament. Given that Siri for 14 years didn't really advance, and most hang onto their iPhones longer. Whats to stop consumes from buying or using iPads or Macs instead of updating recent iPhones just for Apple Intelligence features/functionality? A new M2 iPad Air with 256GB storage is $649 EDU USD is an example.
Selected paragraphs from article.
Lost in all this AI nonsense is how the horrendous Siri experience is apparently just going to continue on for all the devices (the vast majority) that don't support the "future" that Apple is pivoting to
I don’t think it’s just a CPU it’s a ram limitation, an updated Apple TV could probably also do the job in theory. Everything that already exists that is going to get Apple Intelligence has at least 8gb of ram, if this is a limiting factor where probably going to need a new class of device whether that’s HomePod or Apple TV, which has the required ram and an updated chip, but it’s not likely to be a straight swap, but it would be a premium version.
We already have instances of devices handed off Siri requests, eg the ecobee that still requires at least a HomePod for its integration to function
Stupid things still can't manage a decent synch with a Mac either. You hit pause on a video and the audio still plays for 5 seconds after the video ceased. Such flawed software/firmware in so many ways.One of my HomePods sat there repeating to itself “I’m sorry, there’s been a problem, please try again” for 20 minutes on end this morning. Truly a flawless product that delivers on all its original promises and is not in need of any improvement.
I’m not sure I understood the appeal of HomePod. Sure the audio is good but the control interface is/was a known (bad) quantity. People had hopes, and still do, that it will somehow improve with time but the old adage of buy it for what it does now and not the possibility of future enhancements has yet to be proven wrong. Here’s more proof it’s a dud. And it’s foolish thinking a watch chip will ever be able to even do off device processing. It’s just not gonna happen. At this point I honestly don’t know what to say if someone is still all in on HomePods or even considers buying whatever comes next in that product line. But some folks have to touch the stove multiple times to learn it’s gonna burn them.