I suspect they want them to be 3nm node process.Maybe that is why they will delay the new M2 MacBooks....
I suspect they want them to be 3nm node process.Maybe that is why they will delay the new M2 MacBooks....
The iMacs in the Apple Stores are old. They haven’t been updated in over 600 days!
Apple is not planning to announce any new Macs in the remainder of this year, with all planned releases expected to take place in the first quarter of 2023, including updated versions of the MacBook Pro, Mac mini, and the Mac Pro, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said today.
![]()
Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman said Apple has decided to wait until next year to announce new Macs, including MacBook Pros which were rumored to launch this month. "I'm told that Apple is aiming to introduce the upgraded models—including M2-based versions of the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros—in the first quarter of calendar 2023," Gurman said today.
During the company's latest earnings call, Apple CEO Tim Cook said Apple's "product lineup is set" ahead of the holidays, possibly suggesting there will be no new product launches this year as Apple gears up for the holiday season. Apple's CFO, Luca Maestri, provided a more decisive confirmation saying, "we have a very challenging compare against last year, which had the benefit of the launch and associated channel fill of our newly redesigned MacBook Pro with M1," Gurman noted today in Power On.
As previously reported, Apple continues to test an Apple silicon Mac Pro with a configuration that includes 24 CPU cores (including 16 performance and eight efficiency cores), 76 graphics cores, and 192GB of memory. The Mac Pro is expected to be powered by the "M2 Ultra" and "M2 Extreme" chips with at least twice or four times the performance as the M2 Max chip, expected to be announced alongside the updated MacBook Pros next year.
Article Link: Gurman: Apple Planning No New Mac Releases For Remainder of 2022
So Apple has failed on their promise of a 2 year transition to Apple Silicon since we won’t be seeing a new Mac Pro this year.
Do you think Apple has been showing prototypes to the Mac Pro market? That would be fascinating if true. They show their highest end users their new ASi Mac Pro and everyone just says "Nah... Not buying that one." And it causes Apple to delay the release of the new Mac Pro.IMHO, the SOC concept is being rejected by the Mac Pro market. The Mac Studio demonstrated a lack of upgradability, which the Pro market will not accept. Pro users will reject buying an entire new system to just update memory.
I thought Apple learned this lesson with the MP 6,1 "Tube".
Apple has done that in the past, although they usually hide the physical design from testers. For example, when the 6,1 tube prototypes were sent to external developers, the hardware was disguised in a small file cabinet. But this may not be the case with AS because the Mac Studio demonstrates a "near-Pro level" of performance but also a severe lack of upgradability (with current M SOC).Do you think Apple has been showing prototypes to the Mac Pro market? That would be fascinating if true. They show their highest end users their new ASi Mac Pro and everyone just says "Nah... Not buying that one." And it causes Apple to delay the release of the new Mac Pro.
It’s still very disappointing especially considering just how far behind Apple is in graphics tech.So Apple is waiting for the TSMC 3nm
Better wait 3-4 more months for it
Apple has done that in the past, although they usually hide the physical design from testers. For example, when the 6,1 tube prototypes were sent to external developers, the hardware was disguised in a small file cabinet. But this may not be the case with AS because the Mac Studio demonstrates a "near-Pro level" of performance but also a severe lack of upgradability (with current M SOC).
My guess is their "two year transition" was a "we have a plan" statement. But that plan is not going to work for the MP. Think about it... If it was going to work for the MP using what's known about current/future M SOC variants, an Mx MP 8,1 would be shipping by end of '22 because Apple doesn't suck at building computers. Also, what would an M2 "Extreme" (speculated) powered MP even look like? Physically it wouldn't need to look much different or bigger than the current Mac Studio. Check out the heat sink differences between the M1 Max/Ultra equipped Mac Studios and then consider what an Mx "Extreme" heat sink would look like. My guess Apple has developed a case of Apple Silicon "tunnel vision" that led them right back to the "thermal envelope design corner" they were in with the MP 6,1.
Fail, but at least they didn't ship a POS MP 8,1 (yet).
I hope you are right….IMac 27” coming 2023
I bought mine on eBay so I don't know. M1 Mac mini beyond 8/256 is a lot more expensive even on eBay, so I ended up with 8/256 for $440, which probably most bang-for-buck at this point vs. 8/512 or 16/512 and up.Is there an 8/512 config on sale?
I really don’t want to pay full price for a config which is soon to be 2 years old. But hey, Apple sold a Series 3 watch up until September even though it couldn’t support the latest watchOS.
You might want to review the recent history of Mac releases because that statement is way off base. Apple released new MacBook Pros (of various sizes) every year from 2015 - 2019, including 2 model releases in 2019 (the 13 inch MBP continued that run into 2020). The only recent 2 year gap was 2019 - 2021 for the 16 inch as Apple prepped the M1 Pro/Mac MBPs.Let's face facts, Apple generally updates their Macs on a two year or longer time frame......
Does it concern others what China has in mind for itself and TSMC? It would alter the future of chips and the US"So Apple is waiting for the TSMC 3nm
Better wait 3-4 more months for it"
Yes, you are correct that they announced "new" Macs about every year but those were often speed bumps without any new chips or features. However, the redesigns with new processors only happened about every two years (at best). Of course, that wasn't necessarily Apple's "fault" since Intel only released new processors about every two years.You might want to review the recent history of Mac releases because that statement is way off base. Apple released new MacBook Pros (of various sizes) every year from 2015 - 2019, including 2 model releases in 2019 (the 13 inch MBP continued that run into 2020). The only recent 2 year gap was 2019 - 2021 for the 16 inch as Apple prepped the M1 Pro/Mac MBPs.
Yes, you are correct that they announced "new" Macs about every year but those were often speed bumps without any new chips or features. However, the redesigns with new processors only happened about every two years (at best). Of course, that wasn't necessarily Apple's "fault" since Intel only released new processors about every two years.
Actually, from 2016 - 2019 Apple was constantly revising the flawed Butterfly keyboard, so these were more than "spec bumps". But I see your point. As for redesigns, Apple has usually done that every 4 years (with exceptions, of course).
Does it concern others what China has in mind for itself and TSMC? It would alter the future of chips and the US
The 3nm die is being released next year so Apple is waiting for it. There is a 1 1/2 to 2 year cycle for the Pro and Max chips, so because the M1 Pro and Max came out last year, the next release will be in 2023. From Gurman's article, it looks to be the first calendar quarter (between January and March).Guess that means I will try and pick up a MacBook Pro on sale and not wait for the M2.
I wasnt really excited about M2 anyway. I'm hoping the M3 will be a more significant upgrade with the rumored 3nm die.
It is funny how you said "not up to cheddar," when the Mac Pro has a cheese grater designI suspect Apple got scared with the performance of the new NVIDIA graphics chips and realised that the M2 Mac Pro was not going to be up to cheddar. I suspect putting an AMD Radeon 7000 series in a 2019 Mac Pro was going to give much better graphics performance and more expandability so they decided to hold off. The thing is that so many pro apps are dependant now on Graphics performance so unless it is a generation quicker than the 2019 Mac Pro + internal GPU then who would buy it? Also Thunderbolt 5 is going to have much better support for full bandwidth eGPUs so again you would be looking at comparing a cheaper x86 laptop with powerful eGPU against a Mac Pro or MacBook Pro without eGPU support.
Herein lies the problem which was always going to bite them in the ass. They bit off a lot saying they can take on Intel, AMD and Nvidia with Apple Silicon. Apple Silicon is snappy at OS tasks however it's still no match for a dedicated GPU. The new Apple TV is slower graphic performance wise than a PS4 from 10 years ago. Apple needs to fix eGPU support for M2 or M3 and then they may have a suitable product for the Apple Silicon Mac Pro.
Personally I have decided to hold off on migrating to Apple Silicon until the Mac Pro is out. I have too many hardware dependancies that I can't migrate yet - LTFS, SAS, AMD GPU. It's my opinion that all the other Macs on Apple Silicon are just test platforms until the Mac Pro comes out and so far Apple are failing because it's way behind schedule.
Yep. After the rumored November came and went I decided to hold off on grabbing an M1 Pro. 😕The 3nm die is being released next year so Apple is waiting for it. There is a 1 1/2 to 2 year cycle for the Pro and Max chips, so because the M1 Pro and Max came out last year, the next release will be in 2023. From Gurman's article, it looks to be the first calendar quarter (between January and March).
The iMacs in the Apple Stores are old. They haven’t been updated in over 600 days!