Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
LOL!!!! Have you not seen the M architecture? Memory modules are on the side of the chip!

These aren’t memory chips. The memory is integrated on the CPU. They can do whatever makes sense for their architecture.
iu

iu
 
1 channel with 2 chips plus one channel with 1? 1 channel with 3 chips? 3 channels?

On further reflection, single channel or triple channel memory seems unlikely and apple will continue using two sets of two channels for four total channels.

Perhaps Apple wants to boost the memory configurations a bit to improve value? So instead of 16/32/64/96 we could see 20/36/72/96? There are 6GB LPDDR5 RAM modules.

20GB - 2x6GB + 2x4GB
36GB - 2x12GB + 2x6GB
72GB - 2x24GB + 2x12GB
96GB - 4x24GB
 
Last edited:
36GB - 2x12GB + 2x8GB
72GB - 2x24GB + 2x12GB

While this will work just like putting different size sticks in a PC.

But just like that PC you will have parts of the memory that don't support the whole bandwidth (since it's only hitting half the chips).

So no that is the most stupid "solution" for this odd GB number.

Edith:
My guess....

1. a typo
2. they will actually source 6GB chips or 12GB chips with a wider bus
3. it is 3 channel, maybe 1/4 of an M3Extreme destined for the MacPro which would have 12 channels
 
It's like Apple fed him fake info, or he's deliberately trying to show mistakes so he can maintain distance from Apple legal. I do wonder if the recent sting bothers him.
Sometimes I wonder if Gurman is being a controlled by Apple. He’s been doing it for years now and just gets away with it just fine. Seems like this his his professional profession.
 
Agreed! Memory leak is real and it exists!
I do find that some web sites have a memory leak if you stay on them for extended periods of time. The Macrumors forum is one. Keeping a tab open will continually allocate more ram that does not get released (though it can be swapped to ssd). I've seen this on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. Sites with infinite scroll also exhibit this behavior (no surprise there, I guess) and they are not able to release the earlier content and it builds up.

Other non-browser apps also will allocate RAM over time. Why is Apple Music using 4GB of RAM right now?
 
Well, Apple can always make it optional and have a “toggle button” to turn it on or off. (Having an option)

The Apple Logo lit up always made me happy. The crazy thing is it can be seen far away when someone was using a Mac. Now, it's not the same with the Mac's anymore.
The glowing Apple logo used the backlight of the display to shine through a cutout in the chassis. Very bright light used to leak in and mess up whatever was on your screen. With today's screen tech your toggle option would add an additional layer with an extra light to the display lid, hence making it thicker.
 
Oh boy.. I've been thinking about upgrading from my 2020 M1 MBP to a newer one, but I keep finding more reasons to wait :cool: If they announce something like this, though? Boom.
At this point, it’s best to wait it out until the new MacBook Pro 14” & 16” are announced. Not worth getting the M2 in my opinion. Also, you can do what I'm going to do next month. Order the Midnight-MacBook Air 15".
 
I live in Chrome and I have never seen that issue. This on a Mac Mini M1, with 16gig of RAM and a Parallels Win11 VM that is getting 8gigs running in the background.

FF has always been a stability mess for me. I get more broken websites on FF than I do with Safari.
Haven't you run across certain tabs allocating GB of RAM in Chrome? I have. The infinite scroll sites sometimes do. Forums.macrumors.com will do so if you keep the tab open.
 
Sometimes I wonder if Gurman is being a controlled by Apple. He’s been doing it for years now and just gets away with it just fine. Seems like this his his professional profession.
Agree. I doubt they would directly go after him; he's a Bloomberg employee and his information is published as an official Bloomberg newsletter. Apple would have to put pressure on Bloomberg to stop him. I think it is a mutual benefit relationship so Gurman is pretty safe.
 
I do find that some web sites have a memory leak if you stay on them for extended periods of time. The Macrumors forum is one. Keeping a tab open will continually allocate more ram that does not get released (though it can be swapped to ssd). I've seen this on Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. Sites with infinite scroll also exhibit this behavior (no surprise there, I guess) and they are not able to release the earlier content and it builds up.

Other non-browser apps also will allocate RAM over time. Why is Apple Music using 4GB of RAM right now?
Uhmmm... I spend a lot of time on this forums, and my memory stays controlled, no swap used and, I think, I have no memory leak. But I am still on Monterey, and I'm still using an Intel mac. Safari 16.3.1
 
Agree. I doubt they would directly go after him; he's a Bloomberg employee and his information is published as an official Bloomberg newsletter. Apple would have to put pressure on Bloomberg to stop him. I think it is a mutual benefit relationship so Gurman is pretty safe.
I kinda disagree looking at this from two points, first he is not like a YouTube celebrity that Apple allows an early look at products for promoting products (never seen him around employees). Second is his propensity to write about Apple HR topics, WFH, Unionizations, layoffs, employee sensitive topics. Do an online search of his articles a lot has been the latter. If he was just maintaining a technical leak role that would be one thing but he more like a thorn to Apple in stir up of online controversy usually it generates negativity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Well, Apple can always make it optional and have a “toggle button” to turn it on or off. (Having an option)

The Apple Logo lit up always made me happy. The crazy thing is it can be seen far away when someone was using a Mac. Now, it's not the same with the Mac's anymore.
The glowing Apple logo used the display backlight, which is why it would only ever come on when the built-in display was on. This also meant there was a transparent window on the top of the enclosure, and with how thin display panels have been getting, this meant that with a strong light behind said window (like sunlight), it would shine through the display and cause a noticeable bright spot. The glowing Apple logo had to go. It would have been physically impossible to offer a toggle option for the old glowing Apple logo.

Making it toggleable would require a separate backlight and shielding, which would be very power-hungry, assuming it would even fit in the space Apple has to work with.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.