Low volume lightning cable production will continue just as I can still buy the 30pin, mini USB, DVI and VGA cables at a speciality retailers. Agents in China will buy buy up alot of lightning cables on the cheap to resell, some will be thrown away which is expected. However the Europeans want to get the ball rolling on consolidating different standards of charge cables for mobile devices and it starts with usb-c.That doesn't really solve ewaste anyways. Manufacturers have already planned for a wind down. So if someone buys my cable, that's one less sale Anker gets which will eventually get thrown away if not sold. With the accelerated adoption of USB-C ports, lightning port's death is accelerated and there will be a ton of fully functioning lightning cables that far outlast most lightning devices, much more than had Apple had full control over lightning port.
Again that creates more ewaste than it should. It's not ewaste if a cable continues to be useful. Accelerating the death of a lightning port rather than slowly transitioning it, as well as accelerating the adoption of USB-C unnecessarily creates more ewaste.Low volume lightning cable production will continue just as I can still buy the 30pin, mini USB, DVI and VGA cables at a speciality retailers. Agents in China will buy buy up alot of lightning cables on the cheap to resell, some will be thrown away which is expected. However the Europeans want to get the ball rolling on consolidating different standards of charge cables for mobile devices and it starts with usb-c.
So 8 years is to quick you think?Again that creates more ewaste than it should. It's not ewaste if a cable continues to be useful. Accelerating the death of a lightning port rather than slowly transitioning it, as well as accelerating the adoption of USB-C unnecessarily creates more ewaste.
Calculate the average number of cables that every Apple user buys in their lifetime and you can see EU increased it as opposed to letting Apple control their ports
Again that creates more ewaste than it should. It's not ewaste if a cable continues to be useful. Accelerating the death of a lightning port rather than slowly transitioning it, as well as accelerating the adoption of USB-C unnecessarily creates more ewaste.
Calculate the average number of cables that every Apple user buys in their lifetime and you can see EU increased it as opposed to letting Apple control their ports
Lightning came before USB-C.I believe you mean apples decision to implement proprietary charging created A lot of e waste.
Apple were part of making USB-C, it was in the works for years and they still went with their own for $$$$$ reasons.Lightning came before USB-C.
Did you read the rest of the thread?Lightning came before USB-C.
The case is the only component that's ever had a port on it, so I’m not sure the problem?Just the case? I won't be buying AirPods until they come with USB-C ports. Yes wireless charging is working but I hate carrying extra cables just for the phones/AirPods when I need to travel light. Fewer cables to carry is a welcome change.
Each incremental refinement is incremental innovation. This is the basis of kaizen.If you cannot innovate anymore, for whatever reason, search for innovation in refinements and quality. Things are being tossed out but there is so much to improve to make the products just as appealing as if you made a one time innovation.
Is there some downside to these devices using an older standard?It will probably be 5 more years before our family is fully transitioned to USB-C, if not more.
Looks like you might be stuck with your lightning ear pods for awhile then.The case is the only component that's ever had a port on it, so I’m not sure the problem?
need context for 8 years, no idea what you're talking about.So 8 years is to quick you think?
Personally, the 5 original usb-c cables i've had since my 2015 macbook, ipad and samsung galaxy phone are still with me and used daily. I've lost count how many lighning cables I've gone through.
If I were you, id consider getting an iphone 14 so you can continue using your lighning cables for another couple of years.
Lightning came out 2 years before USB-C. You say that USB-C was in the works for years. Well, can you understand that Lightning was in the works for years before USB-C. You can $$$$$ believe what you want, but Lightning was a big improvement at the time and USB-C was not an option at the time.Apple were part of making USB-C, it was in the works for years and they still went with their own for $$$$$ reasons.
They do not care about e-waste, never have.
Great, and then everyone can throw out all those trackpads, mice & keyboards for even more E-waste. 🙁Good. Now, how about the magic trackpad, magic mouse and magic keyboard? Because using an outdated technology doesn't look very "magic" to me.
Lightning came before USB-C.
What hasn't been established is if you can buy AirPods 2 with USB-C without needing to buy AirPods2 (inc lightning case) + AirPod2 USB-C case....Makes sense if 15 comes with usb-c. Hope they will still sell the lightning version.
To me, the critical question isn't the release of the case.
It's "will they release a new AirPods 2 SKU with the USB-C case only" ?
I have no use for a lightning case, but I would like AirPods2