If there are no new sensors, would seem we will see some sort of [more significant] hardware refresh. I've been liking the sound of "rugged."
I too have a series 5 and I consistently get more than 24 hours of use out of it. Of course I’ve turned off the AOD, since I almost always wear a long sleeve shirt and there is no sense in having the display waste battery life while hidden from view. I work out 6 days a week for about an hour each day, and wear it during sleep too, so it’s not like it’s doing nothing and still performing well. Not to say that I wouldn’t love to get more than that out of the battery, but I charge so many things it’s really a non-issue for me. I’m most interested in a design change to the Watch this year, but won’t complain about added fitness or health tracking.When my 5 dies I'm not sure if I'll get another Apple Watch unless there is a big improvement (especially in battery life) between now and then. My Series 5 (I've had a 0,1,4 and now 5) pretty much goes into low power mode around 7pm everyday. I think just a good fitness tracker that can display notifications might be the way for me to go next. I rarely use it for anything else as it just isn't a pleasant experience and I usually get frustrated and just pull out my iPhone anyway.
Does anyone finds these statements kinda contradictory:
"this year will be the biggest in the history of the Apple Watch"
"II wouldn't expect any major new health sensors this year, besides the possible inclusion of the oft-discussed body temperature feature. But look out for major updates to activity tracking and faster chips across the board."
Yes, GPS version. I would have considered the cellular version if it was actually any good at using for texting or any other input. But it isn't for me, which is why I usually end up pulling out my iPhone. Also my carrier doesn't support it anyway and was told the cellular version even gets worse battery life. Again pretty ridiculous after all these years I still can't even say "Hey Siri, start/stop/pause outdoor walk" without either having my iPhone will me or the cellular version.You have the gps only version? Having the cellular version is nice when you go on a run/walk/bike/hike or if you go to a beach or waterpark. Still available for calls and texts in addition to the regular fitness tracking.
I really don't get how people get that much life out of it. Again this is my 4th version. I am pretty active as I do a ~4 mile walk every morning and a ~2 mile walk in the early evening on top of playing tennis or pickleball or going to the gym ~5 times a week. But other than that I don't use it to text/talk/play music or anything else other than receive some notices - again partly because it isn't good at it and partly because I don't want it get any less battery time than I already do!I too have a series 5 and I consistently get more than 24 hours of use out of it. Of course I’ve turned off the AOD, since I almost always wear a long sleeve shirt and there is no sense in having the display waste battery life while hidden from view. I work out 6 days a week for about an hour each day, and wear it during sleep too, so it’s not like it’s doing nothing and still performing well. Not to say that I wouldn’t love to get more than that out of the battery, but I charge so many things it’s really a non-issue for me. I’m most interested in a design change to the Watch this year, but won’t complain about added fitness or health tracking.
This is the only Apple product that I wish would get thinner, just for wear comfort.The only thing I don’t like about my 4 series is the voluptuous ”thiccness” of the body.
If they can shave off a few mils so it doesn’t snag in everything when I’m taking things apart it would be ace.
I’m satisfied with everything else on my 4 series.
I have one of those on my Apple Watch se it works really goodThere are PLENTY of rugged cases you can put on an Apple Watch. Many around $20.
View attachment 1966090
And needs a battery to match. Until the the Apple Watch can get me through a full Ironman I’ll be sticking with my GarminAs a sports watch no new hardware is required. It simply needs to measure and report the same metrics as a Garmin Fenix. The hardware is already in place but the reporting is shallow and of no use for training programs.
Obviously everyone has different use cases and results, but it seems strange that you’re not getting more battery life out of it, especially for having the GPS version. I’ve got the cellular version and don’t normally text on it, but do take the occasional phone call.Yes, GPS version. I would have considered the cellular version if it was actually any good at using for texting or any other input. But it isn't for me, which is why I usually end up pulling out my iPhone. Also my carrier doesn't support it anyway and was told the cellular version even gets worse battery life. Again pretty ridiculous after all these years I still can't even say "Hey Siri, start/stop/pause outdoor walk" without either having my iPhone will me or the cellular version.
I really don't get how people get that much life out of it. Again this is my 4th version. I am pretty active as I do a ~4 mile walk every morning and a ~2 mile walk in the early evening on top of playing tennis or pickleball or going to the gym ~5 times a week. But other than that I don't use it to text/talk/play music or anything else other than receive some notices - again partly because it isn't good at it and partly because I don't want it get any less battery time than I already do!
A Fenix 7+ couldn’t get me through a full Iron Man. My problem is more motivational than technical. Good luck with your training.And needs a battery to match. Until the the Apple Watch can get me through a full Ironman I’ll be sticking with my Garmin
If you think the watch is not fast enough, you probably need to slow down.I’ve had 0, 3, 4, 5, and now 7.
I’m happy with 7. However, none of these have ever been fast enough. Too slow. Even if it became 3x speed, I doubt I would upgrade for it plus square sides. I’ll upgrade when they put in a new sensor.