Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Gurman did not reveal if the 15-inch MacBook Air will also be equipped with the M3 chip. He said a 15-inch model with an M2 chip "may still excite consumers," but would "quickly become outdated" given the M3 chip is on the horizon.

"Consumers" is what this model would be aimed at, so makes sense to give it an M2 to both keep the price low(er) and to protect the 16" MacBook Pro (which likely will not see M3 Pro/Max until Q4 2023 or Q1 2024).


So I guess we’re just.. skipping the M2 Ultra chip then?

That SoC is going into the 2023 Mac Pro.


The 13” M2 Air is not even a year old. Being already replaced with M3 after less than 12 months makes the M2 sound like an unneeded upgrade.

MacBook Air is the significant majority of all Mac sales so it is the one model that makes sense to give regular updates since the sales and replacement/upgrade cycles are the strongest so you always want something "fresh and new" to drive both.


The 15" Air would be a Day One buy for me, regardless of the chip...if it had mini LED.

Not until the 16" MacBook Pro gets OLED.


M3 Chip on the smaller MacBook Air and M2 Chip on the bigger MacBook Air? Sounds about Tim cook Apple

Sounds like a way to protect the 16" MacBook Pro.
 
One of the questions yet to be answered is weight in all these MBA rumors.

M2 SDR 13.6" screen MBA is 2.7 pounds (1.24 kg)
M2 HDR 14.2" screen MBP is 3.5 pounds (1.60 kg) M2 Pro; 3.6 pounds (1.63 kg) M2 Max
M2 HDR 16.2" screen MBP is 4.7 pounds (2.15 kg) M2 Pro; 4.8 pounds (2.16 kg) M2 Max

Larger SDR 15.5" screen MBA requires a larger battery, also chassis is heavier, if it M2 Pro that will add weight too. The larger 15" MBA might not be as easy to use will transportation (airplane, rail, bus) or fit into a backpack. Just things to consider comparing to your 4.3 pounds (2.0 kg) 2019 16" model.
We shall see. Even if it’s a little lighter, I’ll be fine. I also hate how hot it gets doing light stuff on it.
 
Can't wait for them to gimp the base model hard drive again like they have been doing with the last few models (air and pros)
It would be interesting to see how many of the smallest SSD units they even manufacture? I can't imagine many people buy the base model. I think they just want to be able to advertise a low starting price.

On the other hand I suppose some people just use external storage. IMO the smallest SSD offered should be at least 512GB. Anything less is just silly.
 
The 15" Air would be a Day One buy for me, regardless of the chip...if it had mini LED.

The MacBook Pro I have is definitely overkill for me. I don't need all this processing power or RAM. And I'd love to have a lighter-weight laptop that does everything I'd need it to do. Unfortunately, I've been using this incredibly beautiful mini LED display for over a year now and there's no way I could go back to a standard LCD. :( I feel the same about the 14 Plus. I don't need the enormous camera bump and I'd love to get a thinner, lighter phone. But I can't go back to 60 Hz. If they ever bring more advanced displays to their "entry-level" products I'll consider switching. For now, it has to be "Pro" for me.
Same here, very happy with my MPB 14" M2 but main USP is the fantastic XDR 120Hz screen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roncron
Spring 2023
Macbook Air 13 and 15 inch with M3 (m2 was an intermediate step)
Summer 2023
Macbook Pros with M3
Mac Pro M3
Studio not updated until 2024 to support Pro sales
Fall 2023
iPads Pro with M3
iPad mini 7 m3
Regular iPad 11 m2
 
If Apple puts an M2 into the 15" MBA and an M3 into the 13" MBA, it'll be a giant slap in the face to everyone who buys the 15" machine.

Of course, Apple knows many will buy the 15" machine anyway, so they might just do it, and hold the 15" M3 back until 2024 just to be a d*ck.

But the next 13" MBA will definitely get an M3, otherwise people have little reason to buy it over the current M2 MBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sharky25ant
Back in 2015-2017, lots of folks loved the 12" form factor enough to sacrifice performance and battery life.

With Apple's M-series silicon, there's no need for sacrifices.

I'd gladly buy one for on-the-go in addition to my main Macbook. I'm sure I'm far from the only one who would do this.
Diffidently, the recent energy efficient AS SoC's could make a perfect 12" MB/MBA now. Before with intel processors it would be something anemic comparably stuck to using a 2017 1.3GHz dual-core Intel Core in the last 12" MB offered.
 
The 13” M2 Air is not even a year old. Being already replaced with M3 after less than 12 months makes the M2 sound like an unneeded upgrade. Interesting to see how this evolves over time. Maybe Apple Silicon goes tik-tok like Intel.

Very true.

But what appealed to most folks about the M2 MBA was not that it had an M2 chip: the M1 was already plenty powerful for most typical MBA buyers.

The M2 MBA was an exciting upgrade because it was the first totally new form factor for a Macbook Air in over 10 years. It came with magsafe, a brighter (and slightly larger) display, and better webcam.

It makes sense to me that Apple would update the M2 MBA to M3 with very few other changes. (Maybe WiFi6E?)
 
1000 nit sustained XDR MiniLED displays use much more battery capacity, specially the larger the display is. Thats is going away from Air lightness to a 14"/16" MBP. Perhaps eventually you'll see a OLED display used. ;)

Why would it be 1000 nit sustained?

On the contrary, the mini-LEDs enable local dimming and therefore require less battery.
 
Why would it be 1000 nit sustained?

On the contrary, the mini-LEDs enable local dimming and therefore require less battery.
Thats a comparison to screen specs involving the 11"/12.9" IPad Pros, and the 14"/16" MBP that use mini-LED backlighting to allow full HDR. The OLED displays in the latest iPhones are 1000 nits max brightness (typical); 1600 nits peak brightness (HDR); 2000 nits peak brightness (outdoor). The current 13.6" MBA LCD is a normal 500 nits LCD LED backlit screen. Do you expect a 15.5" MBA to cost noticeably more, then you start to compare it directly to both the MBPs IMHO. Below is a article to see if anyone uses mini-LED in a PC laptop for power efficiency, compared to going to OLED.


Pros and Cons – Why would you want a mini LED laptop?​

As explained above, mini LED panels are highly versatile on laptops because:

  • they allow for richer blacks and better contrast than regular LED IPS panels;
  • can get very bright in both SDR and HDR mode, with pretty much all options going over 1000 nits in HDR;
  • the most advanced options still offer fast refresh rates (up to 240 Hz) and response times (down to 3 ms, with Overdrive), making them well suited for gaming;
  • these panels do not suffer from the burn-in, black crush, or the other inconveniences of OLEDs;
  • can be implemented on either matte or glossy displays, unlike OLEDs, which are all glossy.

Pros and Cons – The quirks of the mini LED technology​

At the same time, there are also some particularities and quirks that you should be aware of when choosing a mini LED display on your laptop:

  • mini LEDs suffer from vignetting around the edges, due to the fact that the zones at the edge of the panel are each lit by only two LEDs, and not by four as all the others. This is especially noticeable on white content at higher brightness levels;
  • mini LEDs can suffer from blooming when white content is displayed over black content (such as with movie subtitles) or the other way around. This is less pronounced on options with a denser array of LEDs;
  • because the process of local dimming is controlled through software, certain mini LED panels might experience ghosting (motion trailing) when switching between dark and white content. This is especially noticeable in the mini LED panels with slower refresh and response times;
  • uniformity can be problematic on certain mini LED panels, especially when set up at lower brightness levels; this is mostly visible on the options with fewer mini LED sources (those with less than 1000 dimming zones);
  • finally, mini LED panels are expensive, and tend to be only bundled with the highest-tier configurations of most laptops. Thus, they might not be within rich for most buyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roncron
Thats a comparison to screen specs involving the 11"/12.9" IPad Pros, and the 14"/16" MBP that use mini-LED backlighting to allow full HDR.

Yeah, but I don’t see why the 15-inch Air would get mini-LED anyway. They seem to be using it as a differentiator for the Pro.

Either way: at similar brightness, mini-LED will draw less power, because it can dim more zones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaruLV and roncron
Is it? I know that Mini LED is LCD. I haven't been able to find resources indicating that MicroLED is also LCD.

I suppose it depends on whether you define it as “each pixel gets its own backlight zone” (my assumption; a natural progression of mini-LED) or “each pixel is actually an RGBLED; there is no more backlight and no panel in front of it” (much more like OLED).
 
Personally I highly doubt a new 13” is coming by the summer… that would mean M3 launching right around the time an M2 Mac Pro launches seems a bit off… plus it hasn’t even been 12 months since the latest Air came out…

Personally I think we will get a 15” Air in the next few weeks as a site refresh/mini event with M2… then M3 will launch later this year probably in October/November in the iMac and Mac mini and possibly the 13” MacBook Pro if they decide to keep it lingering around or give it a design refresh…. Then they will bring M3 to the Airs next Spring… with the higher end M3 chips coming mid-late 2024.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.