Haha, so true, but my rebuke avoids the blanket assumptions. Does that make me King of the Internet?
All hail the king of the MacRumors MBP forum!
Haha, so true, but my rebuke avoids the blanket assumptions. Does that make me King of the Internet?
This is exactly why 16GB of RAM will likely be unnecessary for so many people. Plenty of people will buy a rMBA to use in much the same way they use a tablet. Consume content, post messages to Facebook or on forums, light word processing and email. Being a laptop running a computer OS, it will have more overhead, which is why the "middle-road" option of 8GB isn't a bad choice for anyone, however that does not mean that everyone that buys a rMBP will use it as a productivity device.But, i'm sorry, a MBP will always be held as a productivity machine in my mind. So, it's hard for me to relate to someone who feels a tablet suits them just fine. I have never and probably will never own a tablet due to its clear limitations. Owning a 15" MBP that weighs nothing is how I compute mobile. If i need to access data and don't have it, I have an iphone. When I'm out and about, the last thing I want to be is connected.
You mean you don't. I can name off several people who do. Are you even aware of how hedge funds work? Or when you hear the term, do you just think "Bernie Madoff" because you don't know anything else? Maybe you should look up a legitimate name, such as Lee Ainslie. Or realize that it's easier for a smart individual investor to generate high rates of return because liquidity is easier for them than it is for the big boys. Or, most important, you should realize that talking about rates of returnlike you didis utterly meaningless without talking about risk. You might also look up something called "leverage."
You don't know anything about investing, clearly. You probably shouldn't have latched onto this issue as one to talk about. I'd also suggest that maybe you shouldn't be taking your investment advice from some guy at a brokerage house, but hey, you do what you wanna do. You clearly have much to learn.
95% probably can just use a tablet for home use, excluding high end gaming. I certainly do. Top end MBP really should be only for work - I include education in that.
Tablets use case is very different from a laptop. Also tabs don't tend to stick around. They have aggressive memory management, and people are often ok with a little latency.
This is exactly why 16GB of RAM will likely be unnecessary for so many people. Plenty of people will buy a rMBA to use in much the same way they use a tablet. Consume content, post messages to Facebook or on forums, light word processing and email. Being a laptop running a computer OS, it will have more overhead, which is why the "middle-road" option of 8GB isn't a bad choice for anyone, however that does not mean that everyone that buys a rMBP will use it as a productivity device.
Got a question for you guys. I'm deciding between ordering the 13" 2.6 i5 dual core with 16gb memory vs 15" 2.0 i7 quad core with 8gb memory. Gonna be using this for internet browsing and watching movies and what not. But I'm also going to install VM fusion with Windows 7 for Visual Studio for my programming class.
Which would be better for me? The 15" basic or 13" with 16 gb memory? Not sure if the quad core would be better than the 16gb..
How much time do you have before you need to make a purchase? I bought the 13" with 16GB Of RAM and all the bells and whistles (no, I don't need an i7, and I certainly don't need 1TB, but...well... why not.) with the intent of running Windows virtualized to run Visual Studio and SQL Server Management Studio. Once I get it, assuming no immediately obvious IR issues, I'd be happy to post my findings.Got a question for you guys. I'm deciding between ordering the 13" 2.6 i5 dual core with 16gb memory vs 15" 2.0 i7 quad core with 8gb memory. Gonna be using this for internet browsing and watching movies and what not. But I'm also going to install VM fusion with Windows 7 for Visual Studio for my programming class.
Which would be better for me? The 15" basic or 13" with 16 gb memory? Not sure if the quad core would be better than the 16gb..
Whether or not this type of user needs a rMBP is a separate argument. This is about whether or not most users, which will include many people just like this, need 16GB of RAM if they decide to buy a rMBP.If that is the case, you are already a clown for paying the premium to get a quad-core i7 processor to browse the web 2 tabs at a time. You're not even utilizing 85% of what the processor in the base model is capable of. So, if money is that much of an issue for you and your use case is two browser tabs, you've already blown a grand on something you don't need. So, as someone who needs these specs, I'm already looking at that type of user foolishly for having dropped $1k on something they dont need
Whether or not this type of user needs a rMBP is a separate argument. This is about whether or not most users, which will include many people, users just like this, need 16GB of RAM if they decide to buy a rMBP.
Yes, 30 years from now computer will probably run terabytes of RAM. Why does it matter? We are talking about the fact that 16Gb, won't be useful for a 'normal' user on a current-gen machine. In 10 years, your MBP won't be able to run a simple internet browser with adequate performance, no matter how much RAM it has.
I agree that it's the weakest link. Where I don't agree is the value, in money terms. If money is no object, or you don't care about value, then by all means spring for it. However, in doing so, one should recognize that it's mostly lost in resale value. Since the whole point of this discussion is for people who don't upgrade frequentlywhich could be for reasons of convenience, or could be for reasons involving moneyI'm simply suggesting that people in the latter boat evaluate total cost of ownership (TCO) calculations and consider pocketing that money and upgrading, say, one cycle sooner. That's it. I don't understand why this would even be controversial advice.For those who actually utilize the machine as intended and want to best maximize the utility of it by negating the weakest link, spring for the 16GB upgrade. It is not user upgradeable and you can easily hit 8GB usage under a mild scenario.
I hope you weren't referring to me with this line.For those who use the machines as large web browsers, you've already blown a grand or more on something you don't need w/ just the base model. As a shareholder, I thank you for your modest contribution to Apple's bottom line.
Oops, it was unimac. But you decided to involve yourself and call me a liar (about which you were wrong). So really, if anyone's responsible for derailing this, it was you with your replies. If you want this to end, it's easy. Stop replying. If you want to continue it, keep replying. Really, I don't care. Apparently others have found the discussion interesting. But don't moan at me for "derailing" your thread when you've been the guy keeping it going. That's as silly, as well, telling everyone they need to get 16GB of RAM in their laptop.![]()
So ignoring what other machine would best serve these people if they pick a rMBP and use it exactly as we have both described, as a shiny Chromebook, what is the best amount of RAM for their use case?MBPs are and have always been built for professionals who need a powerful laptop. That is the user this machine was intended for. As to the other randos who just want a shiny MBP to impress their friends, thanks for blowing $1000 more than you had to. Keep your 8GB configuration and enjoy your fancy Ipad. Oppossed to what you believe, you are not the user that this laptop was made for... you're already off the reservation and probably could have been best served by : [CHEEKY IMAGE]
![]()
I agree that it's the weakest link. Where I don't agree is the value, in money terms. If money is no object, or you don't care about value, then by all means spring for it. However, in doing so, one should recognize that it's mostly lost in resale value. Since the whole point of this discussion is for people who don't upgrade frequentlywhich could be for reasons of convenience, or could be for reasons involving moneyI'm simply suggesting that people in the latter boat evaluate total cost of ownership (TCO) calculations and consider pocketing that money and upgrading, say, one cycle sooner. That's it. I don't understand why this would even be controversial advice.
I hope you weren't referring to me with this line.
I'm gonna need more beer.
Why do you keep insisting that I'm only going to use 15% of its capability? You haven't even asked what I do with it. You haven't asked what my reasons for using a Mac over a PC are. You continue to make an absurd number of assumptions, and that's why your arguments continue to be fundamentally flawed.Excuse me for pointing it out, but if you drop 2 grand on a machine that you are only going to use 15% of in which there are several other lower cost options, aren't you the clown and not me whose pointing out the most reasonable upgrade to make the system well rounded?
No, I referred to creating TCO models and figuring out what makes the most financial sense, and considering an accelerated upgrade cycle as a result. Do you not understand what I'm saying?You mentioned opportunity cost of $200 as if you could turn that into gold if spent elsewhere. You mentioned opportunity cost in the context of having bought a $2,000 machine and an extra 10% in a reasonable upgrade that eliminates the weakest link of the machine.
Simple question : Why the heck are you spending $2,000 on a 15" MBP base model if you only intend to use 15% of what it is capable of?
So ignoring what other machine would best serve these people if they pick a rMBP and use it exactly as we have both described, as a shiny Chromebook, what is the best amount of RAM for their use case?
Anyone that works with servers and have a real budget for said servers has seen high numbers for RAM. Even those of us without a decent budget know how high the numbers can go if you have the cash behind it. Me, I have a minimal budget and am forced to stretch a bunch of IT VMs with 8GB RAM as far as they can go, and these machines with only 8GB of RAM have performed admirably, running Windows no less.
We aren't talking about power users, we are talking about average users.