The site tried both the polished steel version with a leather loop strap and the aluminum Sport version, saying that both had an "impeccable" build quality.
I can NOT believe how cheap that thing looks.
Not impressed.
Mobile phones replaced watches long time ago and I will not go back.
I think it looks great.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/09/us-markets-stocks-idUSKBN0H410J20140909
Anybody ever remember Apple stock FALLING on a major product announcement?
This is the best e-watch on the market, by the looks, design, everything, especially the high end version (which will likely be silly money) which doesn't look awful, HOWEVER, it seems so unintuitive!
The iPhone was such a hit because it made touch screens, and smartphones, accessible; it certainly wasn't the first "smartphone". But changing the clock face on this... oh my word I would have no idea whatsoever how to do that without an instruction manual. If any of my friends are stupid enough to buy this and they were to lend it to me, I'd probably accidentally drop it into a useless world clock app and have no clue how to get out.
These watches could change how you access the data on your phone, but they aren't going to replace it for the same reason the phablet took off: because there is a premium on real estate. Make this a better looking device which I set from a companion app on my phone or laptop and I'll bite; right now Apple have previewed a device which isn't ready for market, possibly because they are spooked by investors who think Apple need to innovate and so have reacted to that, which is just terrible if true.
To top it off, Apple made the most un-Apple move and previewed without releasing. Yeah, they did it with the Mac Pro, but that was a professional level device which sales were not dependant on hype, but instead relied on a solid base of tested and supported apps, which the lead-time allowed for. This watch is a consumer product, and Apple have taken a (bad) page out of all other tech companies' books and previewed miles before the release. To top it off, nothing irritates me, and I'm sure others, more than when a company says "Spring 2015" and releases on the last day of the season, it just looks bad and Apple made that error with the thin iMacs and the Mac Pro; I fear they will do it here too.
My bimmer costs me $100+ to fill up, so $350 isn't much of a stretch.
This is the best e-watch on the market, by the looks, design, everything, especially the high end version (which will likely be silly money) which doesn't look awful, HOWEVER, it seems so unintuitive!
The iPhone was such a hit because it made touch screens, and smartphones, accessible; it certainly wasn't the first "smartphone". But changing the clock face on this... oh my word I would have no idea whatsoever how to do that without an instruction manual. If any of my friends are stupid enough to buy this and they were to lend it to me, I'd probably accidentally drop it into a useless world clock app and have no clue how to get out.
These watches could change how you access the data on your phone, but they aren't going to replace it for the same reason the phablet took off: because there is a premium on real estate. Make this a better looking device which I set from a companion app on my phone or laptop and I'll bite; right now Apple have previewed a device which isn't ready for market, possibly because they are spooked by investors who think Apple need to innovate and so have reacted to that, which is just terrible if true.
To top it off, Apple made the most un-Apple move and previewed without releasing. Yeah, they did it with the Mac Pro, but that was a professional level device which sales were not dependant on hype, but instead relied on a solid base of tested and supported apps, which the lead-time allowed for. This watch is a consumer product, and Apple have taken a (bad) page out of all other tech companies' books and previewed miles before the release. To top it off, nothing irritates me, and I'm sure others, more than when a company says "Spring 2015" and releases on the last day of the season, it just looks bad and Apple made that error with the thin iMacs and the Mac Pro; I fear they will do it here too.
.
I can NOT believe how cheap that thing looks.
Especially after:
1. Jony I've says: watch out Switzerland (hahaha)
2. They hire the Burberry lady
I was actually expecting a beautifully designed, iconic watch... not even close.
![]()
Hey guys, Google here. Today we are pleased to announce a revolutionary new product category. This amazing device was designed from the ground up be worn on your wrist. It has a magnificent circular touchscreen, the first of its kind. Truly magical. In terms of design, our goal was to create an elegant fashion accessory that wouldn't look out of place alongside premium Swiss timepieces. We're extremely proud of what we came up with, and we think that our customers are absolutely going to love it.
Introducing the Moto 360:
Image[url]
MEANWHILE AT APPLE[SIZE]
[url=http://i.imgur.com/OClymuj.jpg]Image
I don t understand why they think people want a watch who's display is always off and hard to read in direct sunlight...
I was so sure I wanted one until I watched the demo... Screen keeps going to sleep while the apple lady was trying to do stuff... Maybe v2 will be ok.