Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was very glad to see this app last night; if it weren’t for my collection of ripped CDs being in Music, I might replace it as my default music app. That said, I’m disappointed there’s no way to download my library for offline listening, which I do not do with my Music library out of concern it will mess with the metadata of my carefully curated CD library.
I bit the bullet last year and deleted my library of ripped CDs. It’s so much less hassle. Still buying physical CDs and the occasional bit of vinyl for listening only at home.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Phuz01
Yeah, that's a bugger, but on the other hand I understand the playlists you create with it are also visible in the regular Music app, so you can still play them in the car.
Yup, so for now you have to start the app before you start driving. It shows up in “Now Playing” in the Music app in car play. Haven’t noticed the Shazam playlist in CarPlay but would be surprised if it’s not there.

I suspect Apple are working to fix CarPlay integration for the app.
 
Trying out the new app right now as I love listening to classical while working, however it has some major flaws.

You can, of course, AirPlay to a speaker, specifically a HomePod speaker, however you can't "control" what's playing on it.

For example, with Apple Music, I can "Control Other Speakers & TVs", and directly control what's played on them. This then allows me to leave the house or use my phone for other purposes. Maybe have a call, what a video, whatever...but with Apple Music Classical, only AirPlay is available (like Spotify), so the moment I do something else on my phone, the music stops, or for example, when I use my Apple TV where I have my HomePods paired, the music stops.

I hope they resolve this soon. Otherwise, it's rather nice!
 
As noted in an earlier thread, the search function, which I rely on all the time, is hardly better than Apple Music's. When you search Beethoven symphony 2, the work doesn't even appear on the first results page (symphonies 5, 9, 8, 7 and 3 do and under that a few 2 recordings are shown). You have to then select Show All Works to get a page listing all the Beethoven symphonies, including no. 2. You then have to select the no. 2 link to get a page with a (IMHO uninteresting) editor's recommended version, the five most popular recordings and a See All link. And you then have to select that to finally see a comprehensive list of some 500 albums and tracks, with no way to search within it.

I’m just going to clarify something here because this is not entirely accurate. I think the search function is fantastic and you’ve missed the best feature.

If you search for a work eg. Beethoven symphony 2, you will be given search results. Under the Work section, you need to choose the corresponding Work. Then you select See All at the bottom of the Popular Recordings list.

If pull down a little on the Popular Recordings list that comes up, you can search within the Beethoven symphony no. 2 Popular Recordings list. eg. you can search for Karajan or Berlin or 1982.

I can’t remember what it’s called, but this is one of those unintuitive UI errors. Where you have to pull down to reveal the search box. This is my dad’s favourite feature, but he wont be able to remember to pull down to find the search box. I think you might’ve missed it, too.
 

Attachments

  • 0B87E52B-7163-4811-8107-29E90A5C34C1.jpeg
    0B87E52B-7163-4811-8107-29E90A5C34C1.jpeg
    219.8 KB · Views: 65
  • 337F22A4-3FA6-4ECC-9D54-CFB75C58E428.jpeg
    337F22A4-3FA6-4ECC-9D54-CFB75C58E428.jpeg
    245.8 KB · Views: 61
  • DD0EEA1B-C64C-4E87-BA79-D5306C27EE70.jpeg
    DD0EEA1B-C64C-4E87-BA79-D5306C27EE70.jpeg
    186.9 KB · Views: 71
  • A5EBA345-E6A8-4B94-9C2F-B9D5FEC9EDE0.jpeg
    A5EBA345-E6A8-4B94-9C2F-B9D5FEC9EDE0.jpeg
    221.8 KB · Views: 57
  • A8DE8804-ECDD-4BD4-B17F-506A8B0354F1.jpeg
    A8DE8804-ECDD-4BD4-B17F-506A8B0354F1.jpeg
    228.7 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:
So if I understand it correctly, there are no albums in AC that are not also in AM. So I should search and browse in AC (perhaps find new stuff through their curated lists) then save an album as a playlist, move to AM and move the playlist into one of my folders so I can find it again, and use AM to listen via my MacBook (or however you wanna listen).
Using AC solely as a browsing and search app. Why not.
 
Trying out the new app right now as I love listening to classical while working, however it has some major flaws.

You can, of course, AirPlay to a speaker, specifically a HomePod speaker, however you can't "control" what's playing on it.

For example, with Apple Music, I can "Control Other Speakers & TVs", and directly control what's played on them. This then allows me to leave the house or use my phone for other purposes. Maybe have a call, what a video, whatever...but with Apple Music Classical, only AirPlay is available (like Spotify), so the moment I do something else on my phone, the music stops, or for example, when I use my Apple TV where I have my HomePods paired, the music stops.

I hope they resolve this soon. Otherwise, it's rather nice!
I find the
Strangely not available in CarPlay (?)
It will play via CarPlay but you need to start the app from your phone. I suspect CarPlay support will come.
 
I am enjoying the new app very much. Found some new versions of Chopin‘s nocturnes I’d never heard before, which brightened up my morning commute immensely.

The search function is good, and returns comprehensive results.

And to echo previous posts, I’d love for Apple to bring it to TvOS so that I can stream to my HomePods when at home (instead of having to mess about streaming from my iPhone).
 
  • Like
Reactions: philstubbington
No downloading within the app for offline listening. Such an odd lack of function. Yes, I can add something to my Apple Music library, switch over to Apple Music and download it from there... but why not just let me DL it from inside the Classical app?

The way it organizes the music is killer, though I'd like to search within nodes. For instance, if I choose Claudio Abbado under Conductors, it would be nice to be able to then search on "Mahler" to show just his Mahler recordings. A quibble.
 
Little confused why they couldn’t get it going in CarPlay, iPad and Mac for launch. Is the code really that different than the existing Music app?
The UI differences could take a lot of work. Think how long it took to get a weather app for the iPad :)
 
I just wish this was also available in iPadOS so I can use USB-C to play true lossless. Lightning just doesn't cut it.
You can install the iPhone app on the iPad, just like you can with any other iPhone app. I will just show up in an iPhone-shaped window.
 
Repeating here notes I made on another thread:

I'm quite disappointed with this first attempt. The very first selection I attempted to play was a dismal failure. This was the work "Da Pacem Domine", composed by Arvo Pärt and played by the Hilliard Ensemble, from the Album "Arvo Pärt: Lamentate" on ECM New Series 1930.

I searched for composers using "Part". Arvo Pärt was listed first (great). Selected him. Selected "See All 94 Works". Selected sort order as "Name of Work". Hmm, no "Da Pacem Domine". Okay, so I try using the "Search" function at the bottom of the screen. I search for "Part Da Pacem Domine". Not found; the only work found is "An den Wassern zu Babel sassen wir und weinten" by Arvo Pärt, which, as you might notice, doesn't even have "Da Pacem Domine" in the title.

Okay, I browse for the album. Back to Arvo Pärt, select "See All Albums" and it brings up a list of hundreds of albums within an infinite scrolling list. I select "Title" for sort order, then scroll and scroll and scroll. No entry for "Lamente", nor "Pärt: Lamentate" ; there is one "Arvo Pärt: Lamentate", but not the one from ECM. There is no alphabetic shortcut along the right-hand edge or anything to jump to album titles beginning with a certain letter. You have to do two fast scrolls, which then pauses for loading more, then repeat that 30, 40, 50 times or more.

So back to "See All 94 Works", sorted by Title. I look for another work from the same album I am trying to find, "Lamentate", which shows it available on 7 albums. I select that work. Under Popular Recordings, I see the one from the album I am looking for listed. I select that entry. Below the listing of the tracks for Lamentate, it shows "Featured On" and shows the album (that couldn't be found under albums, as described in the previous paragraph). I select the album, which, lo and behold, shows "Da Pacem Domine" as the first track, only it's listed as a movement name under the work name "An den Wassern zu Babel sassen wir und weinten", which isn't right at all.

The app badly needs filters and alphabetic shortcuts to navigate lists of hundreds of entries. It is so hard to find what you want. Then there are all all the metadata problems which will probably never get fixed, as there is no mechanism to report them.
 
For instance, when you get to the point where you see a list of all the recordings of Beethoven's Seventh Symphony, say, they appear to be in order of popularity. C'mon, now, get out of the kid-stuff mindset, Apple!
You can sort in a different order by using the little icon at the top-right of the screen. You get three—count 'em, three—different sort orders!

But, sadly, your desired sort order is not retained. Next time you go to the same screen, the sort order defaults back to Popularity (Hilarity).
 
Apple releasing this on iPhone only is so bizarre. Can't use it in your car. Can't use it in your entertainment center (Apple TV). The two places I'd be most likely to flip this thing on...
 
IMG_0590.png

WTF? Why they need Apple Music altogether installed with Apple Classic?
Or it’s just a bug related to not having subscription now and clicking on this button 😅
 
Sorry the below explained it better.

much more copntext and detail and much more appreciated
I've got about 250GB of ALAC rips from my CDs, and for the heck of it I just looked up "I. Allegro." That is, "first movement, with the tempo allegro (kinda fast but not too fast)." It's such a standard convention in classical music that I pulled up literally sixty different works -- all the way back to Vivaldi, and all the way forward to Shostakovich, who died in 1975.

The main way to distinguish them *should* be by composer, but the free-text search in Apple Music ignores the composer tag, so that doesn't help.

There are other problems too, but they all come from the same fundamental problem: square peg, round hole.

Really, it's about trying to hack one system of information into a completely different system's search capabilities. I've *wanted* it to work for twenty years, but it's really like putting bicycle tires on a car and saying "tires are tires."
 
Last edited:
Little confused why they couldn’t get it going in CarPlay, iPad and Mac for launch. Is the code really that different than the existing Music app?
I can't work this out either. It's really strange. Marco Arment was recently saying that he doesn't really have to do anything much to have his Overcast app appear on all Apple's platforms.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.