It looks like an ass clinging diaper designed by dependsThat case is just so comically awful. For the way this product is priced, it's insulting.
It looks like an ass clinging diaper designed by dependsThat case is just so comically awful. For the way this product is priced, it's insulting.
Says the person who clicked on this, read the comments, and responded. Why waste your time? They may be overprice, but they are anything but nonsense.Read: only buy this overpriced nonsense if you need people to think you have money. Probably goes well with a Gucci belt and other tacky show-off crap.
I dunno, people who criticize people who wear Gucci > people who wear Gucci. I only wear Dior.Says the person who clicked on this, read the comments, and responded. Why waste your time? They may be overprice, but they are anything but nonsense.
I have the Bose, an update last year mucked up the NC. They deny it, no fix. I was ready to move on.Bose QC35 are amazing and by all means a premium product, they beat the new Apple product in most departments, including cable/jack, case and price.
I'd think hard and long when choosing between the two. Bose does not have transparency mode nor auto-switching, and changing the paddings is rather cumbersome (they do get worn out once in a couple years). But the case is great, and audio jack does come in handy on airplanes (and yes, some of us still fly in 2020).
Would an audiophile even listen to music from an Apple device? The sound quality depends on more than just the headphones, it also depends on things like the player hardware and the audio filetype. Apple hardware tends to be pretty good, and these headphones might be pretty good for listening to stuff up to the limit Apple supports, but I doubt I would count any of it as audiophile-gradeI wish Apple would drop the audiophile nonsense.
Headphones/Earphones that really concentrate on audio do not have Noise Cancelling Algorithms, Spatial Cinema (Lol) or Bluetooth. All these things hinder, taint and ultimately ruin the source input. They are conveniences where the trade-off is really crappy sound.
If you're fine with that, (and the conveniences out-weigh the audio quality) then this new Apple offering is probably about as good as the Sony XM3 or XM4 - once you stop drooling over the design and actual concentrate on the audio quality.
I have a pair of XM3s. They're okay for watching a film or maybe YouTube but I'm under no illusion that these are what I would choose for actually listening to music. For that, I'd go to the Shure SE846 or something similar.
I think it was the price that implied it. Heavily implied it.Where did Apple say that this was for audiophiles? Talking about how good they sound is what any company would do but it doesn't mean they're aiming for audiophiles. Anybody who is actually into sound quality will know these are not in that category. These are just "premium" headphones like Bang and Olufsen but priced higher because they can.
Oh man, please do keep us up to date. That is quite an important set of remarks.I promise I'm not an ******* but I did buy these. I wanted them to blow me away beyond anything I've ever used before in order for me to keep them. However it's hard to assess the audio quality over a long period of time because I constantly keep pulling them off of my head to relieve the pressure on my skull. The audio on the few conference calls I've had today were great but the tension from the mesh canopy is getting to be too much. I hope this rubber softens over time - I will give them another chance tomorrow. Looking forward to some peaceful music testing to distract me from the pain.
It’s a good thing I don’t buy gadgets to “look cool.” The iPhone is a tool, the Apple Watch is a tool, and the AirPods lineup are all tools for most people. Contrary to what Apple haters would you have believe, I have yet to meet someone who buys Apple stuff to “look cool.” It’s only used in a pejorative way from non-Apple users in an effort to feel clever as they cling to their outdated, laggy android phone that haz customz ROMZ! No one noticed or cares what devices/gadgets you’re using, and if you are the 1% that cares, all the Apple gadgets in the world won’t help you.The greatest thing about everything related to audiophilia (spellcheck hasn't caught it so it must be a word!) is that by the time anyone can afford to buy anything described as audiophile, they're too old to hear anything...audiophile
Age-related hearing loss (Presbycusis) - When does hearing loss begin? - hear-it.org
As we get older we lose our hearing. Some people get an age-related hearing loss earlier than others. Age-related hearing loss is also called Presbycusis or Presbyacusis.www.hear-it.org
Also, no one looks cool if they're wearing Apple headphones and an Apple watch while using an iPhone. It's like wearing an Adidas track suit.
You should return them right away. Headphones should be comfortable from day one. Having pain from them is a big red flag.I promise I'm not an ******* but I did buy these. I wanted them to blow me away beyond anything I've ever used before in order for me to keep them. However it's hard to assess the audio quality over a long period of time because I constantly keep pulling them off of my head to relieve the pressure on my skull. The audio on the few conference calls I've had today were great but the tension from the mesh canopy is getting to be too much. I hope this rubber softens over time - I will give them another chance tomorrow. Looking forward to some peaceful music testing to distract me from the pain.
Oh, sorry. I guess I struck a nerve with that one. I wasn't serious at all, but now I'm thinking about it. If the average iPhone costs around $800, the headphones are $550, and the watch is like $400, that's a lot of money for tools that don't look cool. But you know, you still gotta mix up your tools.It’s a good thing I don’t buy gadgets to “look cool.” The iPhone is a tool, the Apple Watch is a tool, and the AirPods lineup are all tools for most people. Contrary to what Apple haters would you have believe, I have yet to meet someone who buys Apple stuff to “look cool.” It’s only used in a pejorative way from non-Apple users in an effort to feel clever as they cling to their outdated, laggy android phone that haz customz ROMZ! No one noticed or cares what devices/gadgets you’re using, and if you are the 1% that cares, all the Apple gadgets in the world won’t help you.
You missed off “to me” at the end of your sentence.FU headphones — for the rest of us.Apple decided to turn up the profit volume for accessories as they take advantage of their customer base. Some accessories are now missing, a 100% adder to the bottom line. Others are simply priced to scam the faithful. These headphones and the HomePod are examples of products that are poor values.
Yeah but those tools dont work together..... bit different really.Oh, sorry. I guess I struck a nerve with that one. I wasn't serious at all, but now I'm thinking about it. If the average iPhone costs around $800, the headphones are $550, and the watch is like $400, that's a lot of money for tools that don't look cool. But you know, you still gotta mix up your tools.
Like I would never wear all the same brand. I'd carry a Louis bag (carrying tool), wear Gucci shoes (walking tools), and a Valentino scarf (warming tool). I could wear all those tools without coming close to the price of all those Apple tools and not even look like a tool while doing it
Have you never seen anything by B&O? I'd take the actual premium materials on my H95 over these any day. You know, ultra-soft lambskin on the ear cushions, memory foam, leather headband, polished aluminium casing, and a stunning hard case.They may be expensive, but I have never seen more polish on a pair of over the ear headphones.