I want to make it very clear that this is in no way an advertisement. WayTools did not pay us to do this post. None of our posts are advertisements. Ever. We don't work that way.
I spent many hours with WayTools employees yesterday, watching them type on the TextBlade, typing on it myself, and looking at each and every component that goes into it. I spent time learning about the way that it works, the effort that went into it, and what you're able to do with it.
I was genuinely impressed. I'm not out to deceive anyone or parrot marketing materials. WayTools is doing something with keyboards that no one else is doing and a lot of what they're bringing to the table in the TextBlade objectively innovative.
Pointing out that I didn't get to use it for a long period of time is a very fair criticism of this post. I had a limited amount of time to type on it, but I will say that I felt my typing speed improving over the course of an hour and I extrapolated from there. I also talked with employees who had been using it for months and months on end and observed them typing on it -- they were fast.
I agree with the others who say this sounds like regurgitated PR material. If it isn't some kind of "native advertising", then it's a bit of naivety.
The parts in bold really sound worrying to me. Keyboards are very much about feel - that's why a large section of the article is about acclimatising to this different form factor. To hear how little time you actually spent with the device (couldn't they have sent you a review copy a week prior? or given you one when you were there to use more afterwards?), and how much of it is based on anecdotal or secondary sources, totally changes my impression of the article. Some of those sources are literally paid to type on the product all day. How fast they get at it doesn't mean anything about how a customer would feel buying and using the product, and it doesn't speak at all to its general comfort. You should have made all of this perfectly clear in the article itself, not in a follow-up once people accused you of being a mouthpiece. This information doesn't deserve to just be a footnote.
I just think this was a bit sloppy. MacRumors has a massive readership, and it's clear that you're trying to grow the site with articles like this, but the editorial quality simply isn't at the level of a place like The Verge or wherever we might be used to reading tech reviews. Internet sites like The Verge and MacRumors are big targets for PR people in a massive industry, and MR simply doesn't have the acumen to realise when it's being played. This isn't the first time product posts have been accused of being adverts, despite MR claiming to have received no money.