To also point out, too expensive for some,not for others... No point in a plain "blanket" approach either...
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hands-On With the New 2018 MacBook Air
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
To also point out, too expensive for some,not for others... No point in a plain "blanket" approach either...
But, but, you are not complaining about Apple product. You probably do not belong to this whining forum
OK. Almost one week with my maxed out MBA. Compared to what I have been using since mid-2011, I am impressed. The smaller footprint is a plus since I travel worldwide. Battery life will get me through a 12 hour flight to Asia, which is why I got the MBA in the first place. And since I had been waiting a long time for a decent storage solution, having 1.5 TB is a plus (although a hit on the wallet). As for the keyboard; sure, I am getting used to the butterfly mechanism but this is not a show stopper. Retina display is great, although I am a little disappointed the brightness isn't as good as my prior version. All in all, this was a good upgrade for my needs. Hope many more have the same.
Honestly, this was always my dream. A several terabyte iPhone that could be an excellent phone and a full desktop at home.In the meantime Samsung is making DEX . https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/apps/samsung-dex/
When are we getting our post PC Device from Apple
How'd it go? My biggest issue is I just don't see the value for money. Last one lasted 5 years and there's no way in hell the 2018 model fits that bill IMO.
I would challenge the statement that Apple commands unusually “high margins.” I work with retailers and they all typically require 50% plus gross margins and after cost of selling and other expenses, they net 20-30% at best. If you look at the cost of an iPhone, for example, which is typically quoted as cost of components only (less production and logistics costs) and consider the same margin requirements, it all looks very reasonable. Add to it the fact that Apple has a considerably higher R&D cost versus a typical retailer and that equation looks even more reasonable, especially considering Apple is a premium brand.
Add the value add of software with free upgrades, bundled productivity suite, cloud services and cross-device integration (all require cloud services, which cost money) and Apple’s margins look even more reasonable still.
[doublepost=1542551954][/doublepost]
Exactly. I remember watching Phil attempt to sell everyone on iPhone 7 without the jack by saying “this is an obsolete, inferior technology.” Well, if that’s the case, then why do you insist on putting it into your brand new computers three years later?
We all know the truth... it had to go because of waterproofing and space requirement for the hectic engine, but selling it this way would come across as compromise, not progress... and Apple could not frame it this way.
I just picked up the new MacBook Air to replace my existing travel laptop, the Early 2015 MacBook. I was debating between getting the entry Pro or the Air and decided to give up some performance in return for convenience, mainly Touch ID and slightly smaller/lighter footprint. They are priced about the same.
I like the new Air. It's really a great, mainstream machine. Seems like a competent device that is decisively middle of the road in all aspects. I really like the screen size when compared to the 12" MacBook. I like having a little bit more real estate and think it will translate to better productive and less strain on my eyes.
The keyboard feels similar to the Macbook, but somehow more refined. I personally really like the new keyboard and did from day one, even the first generation. The short travel takes a little time to getting used to, but otherwise it's fine.
I like the new Air. It's really a great, mainstream machine. Seems like a competent device that is decisively middle of the road in all aspects. I really like the screen size when compared to the 12" MacBook. I like having a little bit more real estate and think it will translate to better productive and less strain on my eyes.
The keyboard feels similar to the Macbook, but somehow more refined. I personally really like the new keyboard and did from day one, even the first generation. The short travel takes a little time to getting used to, but otherwise it's fine.
I love it too, I believe I type faster on it and find it requires less effort. I also find the clickyness good, it means I know when I have touched a key. Using any plasticky nightmarish windows laptop and chunky greasy awful keyboard makes me happy every day that I spent a few hundred more on a mbpntb 2017.
[doublepost=1542608580][/doublepost]
Why is it going to do harm? It requires less of a push so a softer touch, I do not need to extend anything more than my finger and I can type without any wrist movement.
I agree and I've been thinking about it yesterday. Why do I like the new keyboard and feel that I am able to type faster on it? I decided to do a trial. I tested speed and accuracy using the latest iMac keyboard, which has a shallower travel already as compared to more traditional desktop keyboards, and then tried with the new Air.
The results?
2017 iMac - 73 average words per minute at 99% accuracy
2018 MacBook Air - 74 average words per minute at 100% accuracy.
Both are pretty close, but I made virtually no mistakes on the Air and I think it's because the keys are slightly larger. You simply hit the target more often. Autocorrect could also play a role, so it's hard to tell. Typing on the MacBook is louder and more "clicky," but not distracting at all. I honestly don't understand what the fuss is about.
I have mailed tim cook several times in the past few yrs and some things have appeared that point to apple taking this direction but when i look at the other product line it seems they are hell bound on people using both iPhone a macbook and a iPad. Apple is mostly looking at sales number for devices which is sad. If it were Steve he would have made devices that competed with its own sales. Steve always set a benchmark for products that competed with its own lineup such that Apple always stayed ahead and never had to rely on competition from outside. Tim seems to be failing on that front.
I'm reading through this tread on my new MBA, and I think we all have to put things into perspective. We are at a glorious time for technology. We carry powerful computers in our pockets. We have internet access everywhere. We have iPads, which serve as a primary home computer for many. And we have Macs. There is a Mac for every kind of user. I am not a programmer, video editor, or artist. The MBA is perfect for my needs. It's not going to be for everyone. A pro should get a MacBook Pro. I am a CPA and must use a Windows machine for work. For my home computing needs, the MBA is perfect. It's going to be the best selling Mac because of its size, display, form factor and Touch ID. And it is plenty fast for anything I need it for.