They weren't wrong about the shiny backplate, my god that looked like a mess after a short while. It wasn't just fingerprints, it was a scratch magnetic. The AirTag has the same issue, after a year it looks like it's spent a few hours on a sander.
I wish they would as well but I just know it’d be very very priceythis was what got me into apple back in 2001, got my first in 2002 starting high school with the iMac G4. survived until going to college.
I remember how it was just a total light-bulb moment the first time handling it - that it was doing so naturally what everything else struggled with.
I'd love for them to release some type of 25th anniversary product - no idea what it would be - but something for us nostalgic consumers to buy. no idea what it would be, but would be fun
I wish to Christ I bought one of the last nanos - the earlier models don’t have Bluetooth and none of my cars I’ve owned in the last decade recognise iPods anymore. Obviously, why would they bother?Re: 'With the iPhone that does everything an iPod does, there's no longer a need for the iPod. "
That's not exactly true. That would sort of be like saying there's no longer a need for apple watch. What I'm getting at is that I think there is still a need for iPod nano. Maybe not the iPod classic. But the iPod nano could benefit those of us who might want to sync some of our playlists to a device that's smaller than a smartphone, but bigger than an apple watch. iPhone mini could sort of be the solution, but they'd have to make a new iPhone mini for the 18 series, as the iPhone mini 13 is getting a bit long in the tooth.
jesus christ things became so bad I even want the unbothered webdesign of the review page backThat CNET article about the iPod changing computing, just days after it was released, was spot on-
I think we need a 25th anniversary re-release
I still have a subscription to iTunes Match / iTunes Music Library, so my personal library is in the cloud, accessible from anywhere.I really wish Apple could wake up and realize that this type of music consumption is far more superior than subscription based streaming.
I would have a streaming service AND this type of device with music I actually owned in perpetuity. No need for silly licensing games.
It really doesn’t though. The post mentions using it as a hard drive, which was removed in favour of dumb media mode.With the iPhone that does everything an iPod does, there's no longer a need for the iPod.
iBook G3 was not like a current MBA, it was one rank below it.I find it interesting that people were complaining about the $399 price -- if only we knew what cell phones would end up costing! (Or at least the ones from Apple and ones that are essentially its spiritual descendants, albeit ones that include more things.) That being said, they did end up going down in price later, from what I remember, and apparently $400 in late 2001 is more like $730 now (source: CPI Inflation Calculator), so I can understand this a bit more looking at things that way.
On the other hand, the iBook G3 was introduced the same year at $1299 (about $2400 now), which I guess would be something like MacBook Air now, and those prices have even gone down a bit ($999 for the base model now). So, I'm not really sure to compare electronics like this -- this doesn't seem the best way. But still interesting!