Currently sporting the iPad 2 and I'm content with it and was waiting for the next iPad in March to upgrade. However, I would certainly buy the Mini if it had retina since upgrading screens would be my main incentive to get another iPad.
Most rumors so far have pointed to a non retina 1024x768 display.
I think that's pretty likely because of the expense and battery power required to power a retina display and the GPU to drive all those pixels.[/QUOTE
Is that better then the iPad 2?
Is that better then the iPad 2?
It is the same as the iPad 2 but as it is a smaller screen it will have a higher ppi.
It is the same as the iPad 2 but as it is a smaller screen it will have a higher ppi.
Most rumors so far have pointed to a non retina 1024x768 display.
I think that's pretty likely because of the expense and battery power required to power a retina display and the GPU to drive all those pixels.
That sucks. I would have purchased with no hesitation if it was Retina. Thanks.
That's little consolation considering smaller 7" tablets now have resolutions of 1280x800. I suppose the average buyer won't care but I'd be surprised if Apple put out something that doesn't even match the specs of what is now standard in the tablets these days. I guess you'd really have to love iOS.
They put out computers without USB 3.0 until this year, and still put out computers without blu-ray drives.
I don't want an Android tablet. Not at any price or resolution.
A display is hardly on par with peripheral attachments.
What I don't get is there have been leeks of the screen , but still people can't say for sure if is retina or not
My guess is since there's been no leaks of retina is because there is no retina
Agreed 100%. Almost all of your mobile products contain the Retina Display so why wouldn't you separate yourself from the competition in that lower price range by adding something that people can't get anywhere else? I seriously doubt the iPad mini is going to be $199 like the Nexus 7 and the Kindle (guessing $300-$350) so why wouldn't you add something that would make one want to fork over the extra $100-$150 dollars? The only reasons I can think of is to keep costs down to maximize profit or they don't want to undercut the premium model (iPad 3) by making a smaller clone of it. Since nothing's actually been confirmed, let's just hope Apple adds Retina to the Mini (even if it's unlikely).I've been hearing this rumor a lot and, not being a techie, I'm having a hard time understanding the pessimism about the mini not having retina. If my iPhone 4S has a retina screen, and the super-thin iPhone 5 has a retina screen, then why can't the iPad Mini?
Whatever the explanations are, it would be a mistake for them to release a premium-priced 7ish-inch tablet that has a LOWER screen resolution than much cheaper Kindles and Nooks. The general consumer won't give a crap about the technical excuses Apple makes.
I would say it would be a mistake even if it sells in big numbers and they make a huge profit and boost their share price. Apple's longevity rests on its reputation of being best-in-class. Right now the iPad is absolutely the best-in-class as far as the screen goes and it would be a step backwards to release a Mini that can't compete with a Nook but costs twice as much.
This is a precarious time for Apple. They're riding high, despite the Maps issue (which I think was way overblown, and actually love the new Maps) but people are watching to see if the quality can be sustained without Jobs inspiring (and terrorizing) the engineers to make the impossible happen. They need to pull a rabbit out of their hat next Tuesday.
I've been hearing this rumor a lot and, not being a techie, I'm having a hard time understanding the pessimism about the mini not having retina. If my iPhone 4S has a retina screen, and the super-thin iPhone 5 has a retina screen, then why can't the iPad Mini?
This is a precarious time for Apple. They're riding high, despite the Maps issue (which I think was way overblown, and actually love the new Maps) but people are watching to see if the quality can be sustained without Jobs inspiring (and terrorizing) the engineers to make the impossible happen. They need to pull a rabbit out of their hat next Tuesday.
The ipad 2 didnt get a retina screen even though there were lots of people like you who said it had to, etc, because the technology wasnt available to make a 3+ million pixel screen on a 10" screen at an affordable price in high quantity, now 6 months after we finally get the screen on the iPad 3, everyone is screaming why hasnt Apple shrunk it by over 30% and made it cost even less so they can put it into a $250 device. Its not going to happen, this time, and much like it not happening with the iPad 2, where there were huge predictions that the iPad 2 would not sell other tablets were going to take over the market, etc the iPad Mini is going to sell millions of units and be a big hit, and next year we'll see retina on it.
now 6 months after we finally get the screen on the iPad 3, everyone is screaming why hasnt Apple shrunk it by over 30% and made it cost even less so they can put it into a $250 device.