Wow, that would be a amazing. I bet you the cell phone companies have already started their lobbying machinery to prevent this from happening.
Why?
Early Termination Fees: FCC regulations would require companies to prorate ETFs, with the penalty for escaping a 2-year contract cut in half at the end of the first year.
So? They'll just raise the ETF. Instead of $175, it could be $300.
Service Maps: Cellphone companies would be required to provide detailed maps showing call quality down to the street level. The maps would be augmented by data on dropped calls and coverage gaps collected and publicized by the FCC.
So? AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint do this already, with the exception of dropped calls, which is a fairly arbitrary.
Fee Disclosure: Overage charges would be displayed separately from taxes, and companies would be prohibited from levying any fees, apart from the basic service charge, not expressly authorized by federal, state, or local regulation.
So? Last I checked, there weren't any charges on my bill that weren't authorized by federal, state, or local regulation. And that doesn't stop my state from trying to tack on additional taxes to make up revenue. (By the way, if you're in Michigan, the state is trying to do just that.)
Contract Disclosure: Depriving us of a source of many posts, companies would be prohibited from extending contracts without "point-of-sale notification," and customers would have 30 days to cancel any contract, new or extended. Any contract changes would need to be sent to consumers in writing, and could not take affect for 30 days.
What kind of sketchball Mom & Pop carriers are out there?
I can't think of any carrier that still renews your contract without telling you, and I haven't seen a contract that doesn't explicitly say that they have to notify you in advance if they make changes to their contracts. This is how people have been getting out of VZW and Cingular contracts without an ETF for years.
And who doesn't have a 30-day return period anymore? (Aside from the 10% iPhone restock fee, which wouldn't be covered under this bill anyway.)
Unlocked Phones: The bill would give the FCC a homework assignment: a single-spaced report to Congress on the harmful and anti-competitive practice of locking handsets.
Great. Welcome to paying MSRP for all phones.
Military Exemptions: Companies would be required to release military members awaiting deployment from their contracts.
Okay, this is a good one, and it's a shame any carrier would jack around someone going on active duty.
Otherwise, this bill looks like a big nothingburger designed to get some PR from people who don't know better.